Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MichaelMcGuire

(1,684 posts)
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:10 PM Dec 2012

Starbucks to slash paid lunch breaks and sick leave

Starbucks is cutting paid lunch breaks, sick leave and maternity benefits for thousands of British workers, sparking fresh anger over its business practices.

On the day the House of Commons' public accounts committee branded the US coffee chain's tax avoidance practices "immoral", baristas arriving for work were told to sign revised employment terms, which include the removal of paid 30-minute lunch breaks and paid sick leave for the first day of illness. Some will also see pay increases frozen.

The changes affecting about 7,000 coffee shop staff emerged as the company tried to quell public and political outrage at its use of secretive company structures that has seen it pay just £8.6m in UK tax over the past 13 years on sales of £3.1bn.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/dec/03/starbucks-slash-lunch-breaks

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
1. So they're going to make the employees pay for the company's tax bill
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:15 PM
Dec 2012

Nice company to work for.

 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
2. Funny, I thought they were already saving lots of money given that the design fees they pay firms
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:17 PM
Dec 2012

are joke.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
3. Fortunately, this hasn't been ending well for the "brands" and hopefully not one that
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:18 PM
Dec 2012

charges $5-6 for a cup of whatever. Their "snacks" are outrageously priced. Lots of local coffee shops around and who knows, maybe thermos jugs will start to sell. One could damn near cook a meal for 4 for what it costs to buy a Latte and Snack.

rbixby

(1,140 posts)
4. I think people fear the local coffee shops
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:30 PM
Dec 2012

mostly because they're not perfectly sterile looking like starbucks is. Also, its not like a factory like Starbucks is, so you might have to wait a little longer to get your drink.


Its all in the coffeehouse experience though, there's nothing nicer and more welcoming than a neighborhood coffeeshop, warts and all.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
7. I agree, except for the wait. Back in the college "coffee and cigarette" days, we would sit there
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 06:16 PM
Dec 2012

forever and get fillup after fillup. Long gone, I suspect.

rbixby

(1,140 posts)
8. Those are still around
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:55 AM
Dec 2012

There's a couple of really inviting places in my neighborhood, aside from the regular fast food places, the mega-franchises haven't really made it in there yet, I like it!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
12. Hard to make a profit, I think, in the New Economy. The good news is I did quit smoking however. :)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 05:01 PM
Dec 2012

sarisataka

(22,696 posts)
9. Well crap
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:07 AM
Dec 2012

I have been supporting them for their neutral 2A stance
But if they are going to have a corporate hissy and take it out on the workers...

Time to take up tea. Never really liked coffee anyway

waddirum

(1,005 posts)
10. everyone wants a sick barista to prepare their drink
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:09 PM
Dec 2012

Make them come into work despite any illness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Starbucks to slash paid l...