General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThink. Again.
(22,456 posts)Edit to add:
and rightwingers certainly DON'T want a ceasefire.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)People are not turned out of power by demonstrations. Do you think that is what should happen?
Gaytano70
(1,217 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)Gaytano70
(1,217 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)PufPuf23
(9,677 posts)Status quo is no hostage release and war being expanded to the West Bank and Lebanon.
Do you think this is a good thing?
Like most wars, ideologues and greed heads like the war while Israel's economy suffers and most citizens cannot lead a peaceful and productive lives.
The USA protesters for Vietnam and the Iraq War were correct. The USA suffered lost and damaged lives while the rich got richer.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)That is how Israeli elections work.
Eko
(9,808 posts)He is a prime minister and if he lost 5 members of his coalition he would loose power and elections would have to be held within 3 months.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Eko
(9,808 posts)That there doesn't need to be an election for him to lose his position as prime minister.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)As has happened many times in the past. Unlike Gaza and the Arab states which live under dictatorships.
Rubyshoo
(1,959 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Rubyshoo
(1,959 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)The top law enforcement officer in our country has gone after President Biden and his son Hunter. Meanwhile a wide conspiracy against the U.S. government has continued unabated for 4 years. It includes the wives of Supreme Court Justices. And that is a whole other can of worms that has been allowed to shit on the constitution.
Doc Sportello
(7,964 posts)Per a CNN reporter on the scene: said that the demonstrators know they won't make a difference and that Yahu will remain in power and won't change his stance. Sounds like an autocrat to me.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)I don't.
Rubyshoo
(1,959 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)iemanja
(57,306 posts)Not to seek reelection.
LeftInTX
(34,013 posts)The party which is most likely to form a coalition is appointed by the president. Netanyahu is head of Likud Party. If he resigns from Likud Party, then he won't be Prime Minister. Then someone else will take his place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Israel
Israel elections are complicated because they have so many parties. It's not a two party system. Likud combines with other parties. The other parties are the "opposition" parties and they have their own coalition. However, after an election the parties decide which coalition they want to join. Do they want to join Likud or the other parties' coalition? Often, they don't know until a week or so after the election who won the election because the parties themselves don't decide their alignment until after the election.
Likud and other parties do horse trading to get parties to join their coalition. If Likud cannot form a coalition, the president will appoint another prime minister.
If during the course of time a party switches coalitions, then a new prime minister may be appointed if it changes the balance. So, in order to get rid of Netanyahu right now, a significant number of parties would need to leave the Likud coalition and join the opposition coalition. If the opposition coalition becomes the majority, then a new prime minister is appointed. I believe that person would be Yair Lapid or Benny Gantz.
iemanja
(57,306 posts)Last election. I know our systems arent comparable.
Rubyshoo
(1,959 posts)The demonstrations tend to show the public sentiment.
The public sentiment turned against the war.
And the public sentiment is where the votes are.
Easy, peasy...
former9thward
(33,424 posts)I noticed one thing. When the draft was ended the demonstrations largely vanished. The war went on but it was very difficult to get people involved in anti-war activities. The anti-war movement shifted from the streets to lobbying Congress. That is when the war effectively ended, and it no longer had any real support in Congress. Our participation finally ended in early 1973 (after Nixon was re-elected in a landslide).
LeftInTX
(34,013 posts)Demonstrations began in 1963 and the war ended in 1973. However, it appears they started up with intensity in 1965.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...unless you consider Jan. 6 a "demonstration".
Anyway, this particular demonstration is calling for a ceasefire.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)iemanja
(57,306 posts)In the Soviet bloc, for example.
PufPuf23
(9,677 posts)ideology?
The political system in Israel is not the same as in the United States.
Do you think Trump should have been impeached?
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Which means they were not serious impeachments. The Clinton impeachment and the two Trump impeachments are examples where everyone knew there was no chance of conviction, but they wanted some PR for the base.
As far as your first question I wish political parties in the U.S. were based on ideology. They are not. They are based on regional and various interest group coalitions to win elections. What was in the Democratic party platform at the recent convention? I did not see a single post on DU discussing it.
senseandsensibility
(24,204 posts)They are going to "stop the country" with a nationwide strike tomorrow. They are working to close everything down, including the airports.
Doc Sportello
(7,964 posts)But I don't see that changing the Israeli government or yahu's intentions, or that of the other hardliners. Neither he nor ius supporters care about what the internal opposition does, or about civilian casualties, or anything else but staying in power and getting rid of as many Palestinians as they can.
Hekate
(100,131 posts)The world is experiencing a political shift toward fascism, and we Americans are not the only ones. It happens when people are afraid, or are persuaded to be afraid. Great change is frightening climate, technology, you-name-it. And fear makes people angry.
You know what to do: engage, GOTV, all that. This is the work of our time.
sabbat hunter
(7,083 posts)by far right wing parties. In the last election in Israel, Bibi got about 23% of the total vote, his far right wing allies 10%. UTJ, and Shas combined got 14%. Israel suffers from fairly low threshold to get a seat in Knesset, 3.25%. It used to be 2%. Israel would benefit from a higher threshold, or a ranked choice voting system.
Out of 4.8 million votes cast, Bibi only got 1.1 million.
People in Israel are calling for a nationwide strike tomorrow, and immediate cease fire in Gaza to bring the rest of the hostages home.
IMHO Bibi thought that dead hostages coming home would have the country rally around him to wipe out the rest of Gaza. Instead it has backfired, bringing more people in to their Peace Now agreement.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Which means 66.3% voted for other parties. Yet they won the election. That is how a parliamentary system works. But people seem to only complain about the parliamentary system in Israel as if something dirty or illegal is going on. I wonder why....
sabbat hunter
(7,083 posts)Has a first past the post system, so even though Labour only got 33.7% of the vote, they got a huge majority in parliament. Both countries would benefit IMHO from ranked choice voting.
Trueblue1968
(19,049 posts)DemonGoddess
(5,127 posts)to avoid prosecution and jail. That's how.
moondust
(21,177 posts)My question on the impasse:
If Hamas agrees to Bibi's demand that Israel keep control of the Philadelphi corridor through which Hamas apparently moves its weapons acquisitions, would Hamas have some other way to import weapons into Gaza? Seems obvious that Israel would want to keep that border under close observation to stop any weapons deliveries.