General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIdiotic AI-generated images of never-pet-owner Trump as a savior of pets are perfect examples of the harm AI images do
Any nitwit with access to an AI image generator can now have it churn out images of Trump the savior of animals, even though there are few real photos, AFAIK, of Trump with any pet even for a photo op, let alone caring about any animals.
But AI images have been trained on lots of stolen photos of Trump, and lots of stolen photos of pets, so we get "photorealistic" garbage like this


to flood social media, along with countless racist images of Trump running from people intended to be Haitians as he carries pets to safety, or armed with a gun or sword to defend the poor animals from a dangerous mob.
Images can often be more effective than words, and genAI made the creation of malicious propaganda almost infinitely easier than it used to be.
And those images quickly flood search engines like Google's, showing up at or near the top:
https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=edac8ac752a361e3&tbm=isch&q=trump+pets&btnG=Search+Images
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)highplainsdem
(62,134 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,479 posts)Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)So it was before sophisticated AI was available.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...the greatest symbol of America, our Bald Eagle, hates him.
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,895 posts)IMHO.
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,479 posts)Woodwizard
(1,321 posts)Is already dumb as a rock. So already a trump cult member.
The ones where it is a much more believable situation are worrying. Or the way before AI, editing out of context clips.
Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)But these images are, to me at least, so obviously fake that I find it hard to believe anyone with functioning braincells wouldn't be able to ID them as fake, as well.
I posted this yesterday: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219435768
...and the amount of discussion from *other DUers* debating whether the image was AI or not distressed me. Not meaning to call out any other DUers - we're all friends here, IMO - but I was dumbfounded by the amount of back-and-forth about it being AI or not.
The intent of my OP was to show how unserious the House Judiciary GOP was for posting that on their official "X" account*.
(*When it's a MAGA post, I refer to the hellsite as "X" - when the tweet comes from a non-MAGA source, I refer to it as "Twitter" - small distinction but "Twitter" still has useful liberal, government and news content despite Elmo's stewardship of it - until that is no longer the case, I'll continue to mine it for useful content for inclusion on DU).
Vinca
(53,987 posts)The closest Trump might have come to having a pet would be if he caught a case of crabs while battling STDs.
haele
(15,393 posts)AI doesn't care though, they'll yank protected material as well as unprotected material off the Internet or any hosting service willing to sell data.
Pull photos off Facebook, business sites, school sites - won't matter to the software.
Haele
Aussie105
(7,920 posts)Trump elbow deep in water with pets?
Not convincing at all!
mucholderthandirt
(1,783 posts)NickB79
(20,354 posts)I'd pay money to watch him get his ass chased by a hissing Canadian goose.
Aviation Pro
(15,574 posts)What the fuck is wrong with these fucking people that they can't see through the bullshit?
Renew Deal
(85,144 posts)
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)After all, he is an old perv and rapist.
I wouldn't trust him near my dog.
Vinca
(53,987 posts)Remind people of Trump suing Bill Maher because he told a joke about his parents being orangutans.