General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust aired on MSNBC Deadline White House (end of 1st hour)
Melania Trump has had a photo shoot of her naked body 🫨
They showed an obviously campaign produced justification with her narrating the piece showing art pieces like the Michelangelo and others about the beauty of the human body.
The wife of the presidential republican candidate whose party is banning school library books for any goofy reason someone dreams up, but Melania Trump poses nude and the campaign is justifying her doing it!
The irony just is astounding.
KarenS
(5,050 posts)but I am.
BattleRow
(2,450 posts)brewens
(15,359 posts)U making side hurt.
Joinfortmill
(21,167 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,391 posts)tetedur
(1,418 posts)mwooldri
(10,818 posts)Posting on Threads would violate community standards.
llmart
(17,622 posts)That doesn't sound like her voice in the video. Secondly, not a question but when you get to the end you can see she's trying to hawk her new book and knows it wouldn't sell unless there was something salacious in it. It Probably still won't sell.
Finally, I really don't care, do you? I am so tired of the both of them.
VMA131Marine
(5,270 posts)Link to tweet
?s=46&t=qcIPkArFYVEwFUZrvCIZGQ
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)So obviously its ok.
msongs
(73,754 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(20,005 posts)whatever with Lara Loomer.
Metaphorical
(2,634 posts)that Kamala will do the same. Personally, I think Doug should do a topless photoshoot while chopping wood or something similar, just to even out the score
(and yes, I think this is Melania's FU to Trump).
moondust
(21,286 posts)Biophilic
(6,552 posts)Schools are banning books because of pictures that are the same Melania is push her book with. I know irony is dead and I know that everything is fair game in this election, but still there is no way to reconcile this.
usonian
(25,324 posts)
Ocelot II
(130,537 posts)Wiz Imp
(9,996 posts)rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Ive shown them to MAGAts waxing rhapsodic about how nice it was to have a First Lady with class after Michelle Obama. They universally denied that it was her. Gonna be tough to do, now.
And she showed that pornographic statue of David Whatshisname in her video. You can see his dingus kinda. For shame!
rainin
(3,246 posts)I remember their reaction was so much and righteous. I doubt they remember.
fierywoman
(8,595 posts)Cosmocat
(15,424 posts)Was just ......
moniss
(9,056 posts)campaign website for $100 each.
dchill
(42,660 posts)moniss
(9,056 posts)the sight of it.
Martin Eden
(15,629 posts)If so it gained her fame, fortune, and a husband with true stench.
rainin
(3,246 posts)Obama's Choice to Bare Arms Causes Uproar
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=6986019&page=1
And Laura Ingram, who has a permanent sneer on her face, often wears sleeveless dresses on air.
Do you seriously care about that? What year is this?
Collimator
(2,122 posts)Just contributing a minor factoid to point out the hypocrisy.
mtngirl47
(1,243 posts)Bleach blond bad built butch body wearing a sleeveless outfit in the halls of Congress.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Theres a fairly extensive portfolio online from when she was about 20 years old. Soft porn.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)Are we going to get all prudish just because it involves Trump?
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)rainin
(3,246 posts)It's "unbecoming" when Michelle Obama shows her bare arms, then...it's fine when Melania poses nude.
They don't care that they're hypocrites, but we do.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)nikatnyte
(345 posts)She did soft-core porn. I'm no prude, but I prefer First Ladies whom I haven't seen fondling their privates.
SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)They fetishize disfigurement of the human breast with massive amounts of silicone. And encourage eating disorders.
The nude photo I saw of her shows her stick thin body, with the only prominent feature being two ridiculously pumped up balloon-like very artificial looking breasts stretching her chest skin to its limit.
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,412 posts)For what she is doing to herself.
BigDemVoter
(4,700 posts)as her horrible husband. . . .
mcar
(46,058 posts)She did some soft-core lesbian porn nude shoots as well.
It all came out when T*ump was "elected." RWNJs said it was art.
But Michelle Obama wearing a sleeveless dress was immoral.
Mblaze
(1,040 posts)To keep Donald Trump in the delivery room instead of on the bed with Stormy.
Mblaze
(1,040 posts)That are hanging in the Jeffrey Epstein gallery.
ShazamIam
(3,129 posts)/L
Skittles
(171,716 posts)aggiesal
(10,804 posts)is trying to equate her nakedness to statues like David and nude paintings from numerous famous artists.
Her nudes is not art, it's more like soft porn.
And this is what we want in our FLOTUS
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,346 posts)Duncan Grant
(8,920 posts)Only public relations professionals can tell lies *this* preposterous and not giggle.
Joinfortmill
(21,167 posts)republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)tulipsandroses
(8,251 posts)According to Wingnuts
PCIntern
(28,369 posts)Nictuku
(4,658 posts)Obama's Choice to Bare Arms Causes Uproar
Critics contend the first lady's outfit for her official photo is too informal.
ByABC News via GMA logo
March 1, 2009, 6:48 PM
March 2, 2009 -- The latest arms controversy embroiling the White House has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. Instead, it's sprung from criticism about Michelle Obama showing off her toned triceps and biceps in her first official photo as first lady.
The nation's first spouse, who often dons sleeveless attire, dared to show off her limbs in the picture that graces her Web site and was released Sunday.