General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJ.D. Vance Reopens Debate on Pre-Existing Conditions
J.D. Vance Reopens Debate on Pre-Existing Conditions
September 19, 2024 at 12:00 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 99 Comments
https://politicalwire.com/2024/09/19/j-d-vance-reopens-debate-on-pre-existing-conditions/
"SNIP..........
J.D. Vance filled in some of the gaps on Donald Trumps concepts of a plan for health care over the weekend, but in doing so raised new questions about how a second Trump administration would handle pre-existing conditions, Semafor reports.
.............SNIP"
ExciteBike66
(2,700 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)they should pay less premiums, and those who have pre-existing conditions need to pay more.
In other words make it unaffordable who need it the most.
keep_left
(3,210 posts)...and apparently has never heard of "adverse selection".
https://democraticunderground.com/100219476695#post4
JD is a total lightweight. He makes Dan Quayle look like Einstein.
applegrove
(132,207 posts)and die off. Only the rich sick will get the latest MRNA pancreatic cancer treatment. That will help with Republican electability since most of the rich sick will be Republican and the dead poorer sick would have most likely been democrats.. Seems Republicans will do anything to keep people with pre-existing conditions from being in a pools with everyone else. The insurance pool and the voting pool.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)applegrove
(132,207 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Those of us who follow health care policy closely understood immediately what he meant.
At any one time, most people arent spending a lot on medical care because most people are in relatively good health. The vast majority of costs come from the minority who are getting intensive or ongoing treatment for serious medical problems ― basically anything from a car accident to diabetes to cancer.
The challenge in health policy is how to cover those big expenses. The approach in most economically advanced countries ― and the one embedded here in programs like the Affordable Care Act ― is to have everybody contribute into insurance funds so that the healthy subsidize the sick. These are the insurance pools and risk pools that Vance is criticizing.
The alternative is to allow more segregation based on health status by, for example, letting insurers charge higher prices, withhold certain benefits or deny coverage altogether to people with pre-existing conditions.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-vance-obamacare-drug-prices_n_66eb3573e4b051614c50d01d/amp
applegrove
(132,207 posts)applegrove
(132,207 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Coexist
(26,202 posts)SheltieLover
(80,449 posts)applegrove
(132,207 posts)SheltieLover
(80,449 posts)Klarkashton
(5,292 posts)Unworkable yet he's promoting it like a wise ass bastard.
lastlib
(28,260 posts)Go f*ck a cactus!
lostnfound
(17,520 posts)spanone
(141,609 posts)keep_left
(3,210 posts)We already got a taste of what they are planning with the Trump response to Covid, which I call a "free-market pandemic"--because that's largely how the US responded after being hobbled by the Trump regime's incompetence. Imagine Maggie Thatcher's moronic quote "There is no such thing as society!" turned into an entire philosophy, applied to everyone and everything, writ large across the nation.