General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"The evidence will be powerful": Legal experts say Jack Smith about to drop a bomb in Trump case
"The evidence will be powerful": Legal experts say Jack Smith about to drop a bomb in Trump case
Legal scholars expect a bitter fight over what evidence may be redacted from the public
By RUSSELL PAYNE
Staff Reporter
PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 1:32PM (EDT)
https://www.salon.com/2024/09/25/the-evidence-will-be-powerful-legal-experts-say-jack-smith-about-to-drop-a-bomb-in-case/
"SNIP............
Special counsel Jack Smith is expected to submit an oversized brief in former President Donald Trumps election interference case in Washington D.C. by Thursday. The briefing is, in the view of the judge overseeing the case, needed to respond to the Supreme Courts presidential immunity ruling.
Smith requested permission to exceed the normal length limits for briefs, seeking to file up to 200 pages of argumentation in the case, which immediately drew comparisons to past special counsel reports, like those from special counsels Robert Mueller or Robert Hur. This comes as a response to the Supreme Courts ruling earlier this year, which found the president enjoys broad legal immunity for official core constitutional acts.
The Supreme Court ruling threw the prosecution of Trump for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election into chaos and the new filing is an opportunity for Smith to make the case that Trumps efforts do not qualify as official acts.
Attorney Ty Cobb, a former Trump White House lawyer, told Salon that the filing from Smith was appropriate and necessary in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling but he said that the filing likely wont be like special counsel reports.
............SNIP"
1WorldHope
(2,011 posts)... it could only be used for cases going forward. Not for things already done.
Is this actually a law now?
Fiendish Thingy
(22,927 posts)A SCOTUS ruling is not a new law.
Martin68
(27,585 posts)broad protection from criminal charges for official acts.
Response to Martin68 (Reply #14)
1WorldHope This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(318,598 posts)know how hard he's been working for our Democracy. against Forces of Evil .
Fiendish Thingy
(22,927 posts)Smith may redact some details, and the whole thing will likely be filed under seal until Chutkan chooses which part to make public.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)BaronChocula
(4,460 posts)But we shall see.
Tarzanrock
(1,250 posts)Tomorrow will not be just another day! I can't fucking wait for this to happen! You're soon to be flushed, smelly, stinking Turd-Traitor! Go ahead, tweet out your "grievances" tonight -- senile, old, rotting Pumpkin Head -- Jack Fucking Smith is about to carve your treasonous, criminal fat ass like an old, rotting Halloween Jack 'o Lantern!
maxsolomon
(38,565 posts)Mueller Time!
Butterflylady
(4,584 posts)One redacted, one that's not redacted to the judge..
BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)Asking for all the honest and decent and law-abiding people of the USA.
#KrackenJack now going viral
orangecrush
(29,968 posts)When the jail door slams on him.
BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)
bucolic_frolic
(54,847 posts)everything will be core by spring
ancianita
(43,283 posts)They're lazy hacks who expect the People of the United States to do all the constitutional thinking for them.
Botany
(77,117 posts)is still walking free. His list of crimes would make Whitey Bulger blush.
BTW I expect him to try to flee because there is
no way he wants to stand trail for the crimes he has done.
Rob H.
(5,828 posts)until Trump explodes all over "Truth" Central--I figure the bigger the explosion, the worse it is for him