General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDan Froomkin: What if the media has the election all wrong?
https://presswatchers.org/2024/09/what-if-the-media-has-the-election-all-wrong/Heres a question for you: What if the dynamics of the 2024 presidential election have dramatically shifted and the national media has been too busy doing stenography to notice?
What if Kamala Harris after a spectacular entry into the race, a stunningly unified convention, and a devastating debate is basically running away with it, leaving Trump in the dust, while the national media still mortified by its failure in 2016 to see the extent of Trumps support stubbornly sticks to the safer narrative that its a horserace going down to the wire?
But wait, the polls arent showing Harris way ahead, you say. At most, theyre showing her with a narrow lead.
Well, polls are garbage these days. And the pollsters, whose arbitrary weightings make a mockery of science, travel in packs. They, more than anyone, are terrified of underestimating Trump support again. So maybe this time theyre overestimating it? (Which they sure did in 2022.)
You could, by contrast, make a solid vibes-and-momentum argument that Harris is winning handily. In an extraordinary turnaround, Democrats now appear even more enthusiastic than Republicans. Harris, unlike Trump, is wooing undecideds and independents. Marquee Republicans like Dick Cheney Dick Cheney! are getting on the Harris train. So are former Trump allies.
*snip*
hlthe2b
(113,973 posts)Arbitrary weightings, indeed. There is no consistency as to how to consistently define "likely voters" (and that is if you choose to ignore all the factors that make polls so non-representative to begin with today).
Anyone who has trained in statistics and scientific study design is appalled at how the MSM uses and abuses these "findings" and pollsters (even the "better" ones) are so reluctant to call out the riff raff.
Tribetime
(7,145 posts)And there's a four percent shift from President Biden to VP Harris which would mean about an eight percent lead overall
gab13by13
(32,324 posts)it will never be reported.
Flatrat
(176 posts)We need people to turn out and vote to counter the suppression factor the republicans are employing.
Against fascism no margin of victory is too great.
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)People never bet on anything that they think will lose them money.
At least that's what that guy that predicts elections fairly well says.
So yes a Harris landslide is approaching.
DavidDvorkin
(20,589 posts)But I'm afraid to hope.
Joinfortmill
(21,169 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,143 posts)Media has a patriotic duty to not report lopsided elections based on polls. Voter participation is higher if the public believes it's a close race.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)the election is in the bag, we are looking at a blue wave, probably getting close to 500 Electoral votes... Hell why are we sweating this? Half of us could take the day off and she would still win.
But if you all don't mind, I'm going to pretend it is a close election. We are slightly ahead but that is a fragile lead with everything on the line. I will vote and encourage every person I know to get out and vote Dem like our futures depend on it.
Just in case the media has the election all correct...
republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)What if they don't?
It changes nothing.
Skittles
(171,716 posts)THEY ARE COMPLICIT
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)angrychair
(12,285 posts)Reading tea leaves would be more accurate.
For me that has to be the answer. The alternative is just to horrible to consider.
Did you know recent polling showed the majority of the United States support concentration camps and mass deportations of Black and Hispanic people? Yes, I left out the distinguisher of "undocumented immigrants" because if you are paying attention so did Republicans. I don't believe this poll is in any way accurate. If it's not accurate, how accurate could other polling be?
Joinfortmill
(21,169 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)Then 2022 happened.
Then out of cycle races, special.elections, etc etc showed Democratic Candidates dominating.
Polls are becoming meaningless unless they are hyper focused on specific districts/counties. I'm only interested in granular polls from purple counties and districts.
I also really enjoy how Harris isn't courting the press. There's almost a disdain for the media from her campaign. She hasn't forgotten how they treated her mentor. And I'd bet her campaign is scratching their heads and wondering why DonOld's age and coherence aren't being questioned.
calimary
(90,021 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 27, 2024, 05:17 PM - Edit history (1)
And absolutely has to have one. Cuz it brings the eyeballs. And the eyeballs might just lure the brain into it, and then get the mouth working to spread the word.
GOTTA have the damn horse race all the time. And if there really isnt much of one, then BUILD one, dammit! Its good for RATINGS, dammit!!!
Sigh
Fuckin TIRESOME. No wonder it starts arguments (which make for great television)!
OMGWTF
(5,131 posts)of Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota. During this trip I saw more "Wall Drug" signs than Trump signs and even saw several Harris/Walz signs in unexpected places. I started this trip with trepidation so close to the election but ended it with a very positive feeling. VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!