General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFL ballot
Just got my FL ballot in the mail. It looks different. The candidates names are listed starting with trump/Vance, then Harris/Walz, then the senate race, etc. The candidates names are just listed down the line with no special demarcation as to the party. Yes, it states Rep./Dem. Opposite the name but they all run together. Maybe I am wrong, but this ballot from Hernando County looks a little confusing. Intelligent people should have no problem, but low information voters that are not paying attention could easily get confused. I know what I am talking about because I was an assistant precinct coordinator here from 2008-2016 and I have seen plenty of voters pass through the voting booth who do not know exactly what they are doing. Thats what I have seen previously and I live in a red county. Dont even get me started on Amendment 4, the abortion ban. The way it is worded is confusing and long-winded. Says nothing about the 6 week ban. It mentions that this may result in more cost to the state, fewer live births, etc. and all the bad results that could happen. Very misleading. I have to keep reminding myself to vote yes because one could get confused very easily. I think that is what they count on ..No, I KNOW that is what they count on.
SheilaAnn
(10,615 posts)n/t
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Amendment 4? Wouldnt they be in change of wording in order to get signatures? Maybe it will not be as difficult to vote since a vast amount had to read it and sign the amendment request. Fingers crossed.
samsingh
(18,233 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Ill never forget the guy with the magnifying glass trying to figure out what the voter intended.
samsingh
(18,233 posts)we never would have had bush without that stupid ballot. That one person changed the course of history.
In It to Win It
(12,247 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Florida democratic leaders are fighters and would never allow anything nefarious to be part of something so important.
In It to Win It
(12,247 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)at all.
In It to Win It
(12,247 posts)to take it off the ballot.
The next best thing they could do was use their political power to gum up the works and they had control over the financial impact language. They used that little bit of power to fill the amendment's financial impact statement with bullshit.
The petitioners for the amendment sued to remove that clearly bias language, but lost so the Republican language stayed on the ballot. What is to be expected when your courts are stacked with rank partisan Republicans?
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)of the population.