Is ABC giving this to Vance?

[Melon]

They are really down on the Waltz performance and seem to be praising Vance in the post show.

[LuvLoogie]

1. Is that Lester Holtz?

[msongs]

2. vance was slick and photogenic, that's more important than avoiding the questions

[PJMcK]

3. Why are you watching TV?

There are other ways to watch that aren’t biased.

Corporate networks suck.

[Melon]

5. Because I watched the debate...on my tv

Hiding from information isn’t really how I operate.

[PJMcK]

7. Perhaps I was unclear

One can watch political events without going through the corporate channels.

Of course, we watched the debate, too. Just not on MSM.

[Jack Valentino]

18. Not me--- I refuse to pay for cable anymore

since the price for it is now similar to what a monthly car payment was, in my early adulthood....


Actually I watched it on "Scripps News", which is a digital broadcast "sub-channel"--

[elleng]

4. I don't think 'they' get to vote.

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

6. CBS seemed to be doing this also

Vance didn't shit his pants so he won.

[dflprincess]

8. MSNBC is giving it to Walz

Talked about how slick Vance was but Walz was, as always, a regular guy.

[Melon]

10. I watch abc/cbs

I personally toss msnbc and fox. Same reason different sides. MSNBC is always going left. Fox will always be right. I’m not decided on cnn anymore.

[Lovie777]

16. Facts and truths mean a lot to me; therefore I agree................................

[Self Esteem]

9. Vance was the better debater and therefore will likely be seen as the winner.

That's how these things are scored typically ... fair or not.

It's a big reason Trump has lost literally every presidential debate he's partaken in (outside one: the Biden debate earlier this summer and that was more Biden losing than Trump winning).

[iemanja]

12. I hate to say it

but I agree. That, however, depends on not knowing the facts, which unfortunately is the case for many if not most people.

[Self Esteem]

13. But it doesn't matter who wins.

Harris mopped the floor with Trump and it barely registered in the polls. It was the same with Clinton in 2016.

People said, "yup, Harris won the debate ... but I'm still supporting Trump."

I think people put way too much stock in debates.

[iemanja]

14. I don't think anyone decides who to vote for based on a VP debate

unless, possibly, someone comes off like a total idiot, like Palin did.

[Lovie777]

15. How far has The United States of America has falling....................

When a person/candidate can lie and make up shit and still be the winner of a debate.

[Patton French]

11. Vance needs to be arrested while he's in the arena for his support of J6.

Is Jack smith watching. FF!

[JoseBalow]

17. I liked the part where Vance cried about being fact checked

[B.See]

19. As I just said, some are readily

dazzled by bullshit, especially when bullshit is pulled off in slick fashion.

Vance refused to answer a number of questions, told outright factual lies, distorted Trump's record including attempts at ending the ACA, peacefully transitioning power, banning all abortions, etc.

But that snakeoil salesman allure SHOULD'VE smacked em in their frekin mugs the moment he refused to admit that the orange fuck LOST THE ELECTION.

Which apparently doesn't matter that much to some MSM quacks, as much as how smoothly one pulls off the CON.

Which, incidentally, is precisely why/how we're dealing with a wanna be dictator in the FIRST place.