Does anyone else think that when donald loses, the SCOTUS will wash it's dirty hands of him?

[Ferrets are Cool]

If his cases go to the SC, they will have NO reason to cover for him any longer. They will be like, Donald Who? That is my feeling.

[kairos12]

1. Nope.

MAGA Alito and Thomas don't want to be replaced by a Dem.

[ProudMNDemocrat]

12. Republicans in the Senate have signaled they would OPPOSE

ALL Judicial appointments made by Kamala Harris if she is the next POTUS and they gain control of the Senate.
That would mean US Supreme Court nominees as well.

Not to mention, Cabinet and other picks as well.

[Johnny2X2X]

2. Yes

I think this presidential immunity BS will change quickly once Harris takes office, a case will bebrought and the GOP SCOTUS will all the sudden say, "Nope, presidents don't have any sort of immunity."

[Cartoonist]

3. It depends on what the Heritage Foundation instructs them to do.

They scare me more than Trump.

[hlthe2b]

4. I've thought that for a while.

[LakeArenal]

5. Yes I do. But it won't change their voting against Democracy.

They will think they are the power.

[SamKnause]

6. No.

[Fiendish Thingy]

7. This same SCOTUS, minus KBJ, declined to install Trump in 2020

Despite numerous opportunities.

I think the court still might meddle- GA seems like it’s preparing an engraved invitation for SCOTUS meddling- and candidate challenges under the ECA May end up before the court, but I still think the odds for SCOTUS handing the presidency to Trump are lower than most think.

Remember, the counting of electoral votes in congress on January 6 is not within the jurisdiction of the courts, so any meddling would have to be done on a state by state basis before then (really before the safe harbor date in December), and would involve blatantly overturning the will of the voters.

Unless there are numerous (as in four or more swing states) cases where the margin in a state is just a few hundred votes or less, as in Florida in 2000, I just don’t see the likelihood of a SCOTUS-assisted coup.

[rzemanfl]

8. I agree.

They will be happy not to have to rule whether TSF can pardon himself.

[bluestarone]

9. Guess i've NEVER before thought that the Supreme court was possible to be infiltrated. BUT

For the first time in my life (77 now) i'm leaning that SOME judges are OWNED by rich and powerful. (just hope not enough to destroy our country.)

[GreenWave]

10. Russia, if you are listening, release the dirt you have on SCROTUS.

[Ferrets are Cool]

19. It wouldn't matter. They are above any laws.

[Bev54]

13. They have a new criminal in their midst (Vance) and they are paid to support whoever the Federalist society

tells them to.

[JustAnotherGen]

14. Disagree

MAGA is bigger than Trump and they have a deep bench of MAGA hopefuls.

[dslyahoo]

15. No

They are funded by oligarchs and will do what they want.

[marble falls]

16. Why wouldn't these rats leave a sinking ship? I think Thomas will retire. I mean ... Ginni will let Thomas retire.

[Kid Berwyn]

17. They are his co-conspirators in treason.

May the 6 get locked up for life.

[Hekate]

18. What, and admit they were wrong? I doubt the Scuzzy Six would do that.

[hatrack]

20. Who? Uncle Ruckus, The Handmaid And the Witchfinder?

Never.

[Fla Dem]

21. No, they're directed and influenced by the 2025 team, just as Trump is.