Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberalla

(11,218 posts)
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:41 PM Oct 2024

OMG. I'm in Arizona... we just had an ad placed by Randall Terry on TV * * * Graphic * *

Last edited Wed Oct 9, 2024, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)

It featured dead babies and fetuses... and photos of Nazis. It was accusing the Dems of doing the same thing if elected.

My TV was on mute, I happened to look up - was horrified - and grabbed the remote to UNmute. That's when it had a picture of Randall Terry (at the end of the ad) and that he had paid for it.

The station, ABC, then aired a disclaimer basically apologizing and saying they were required by law to air the ad, and that it was quite disturbing.

I did not see but about 10 seconds, and heard even less. It was shocking, and to me indicates how ugly and desperate they are getting. Anyone else getting/seeing this??

___________________________________


ETA : I found the ad. Stupid Celebrities

https://www.terry2024.com/tvads
There are 19 ads, Stupid Celebrities is the second from the bottom.
I haven't watched the others ( but I'm sure they're horrid too).

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OMG. I'm in Arizona... we just had an ad placed by Randall Terry on TV * * * Graphic * * (Original Post) liberalla Oct 2024 OP
Independents hate that shit. pwb Oct 2024 #1
It was horrible. FM123 Oct 2024 #2
It really was. liberalla Oct 2024 #3
So the disclaimer came BEFORE and AFTER? Jmb 4 Harris-Walz Oct 2024 #4
It came after for me, but I only saw the tail end. Maybe it led with one also?? liberalla Oct 2024 #17
Yes... QED Oct 2024 #18
"REQUIRED BY LAW"? Ferrets are Cool Oct 2024 #5
I've heard of similarly outrageous stuff, just not nearly as graphic... keep_left Oct 2024 #6
That asshole is the founder of Operation Rescue. They would cause all kinds of trouble for abortion providers. rsdsharp Oct 2024 #7
Yes, the name was familiar ... from the 80s & 90s... liberalla Oct 2024 #23
Voters react to the ad Demovictory9 Oct 2024 #8
That guys is a major kook kimbutgar Oct 2024 #9
Is that the truth that they must air the commercial? I don't believe that. mahina Oct 2024 #10
Same here. Mosby Oct 2024 #15
What if the political ad contained graphic sexual rather than violent and graphic images of death? mahina Oct 2024 #19
I think according the FCC Torchlight Oct 2024 #21
It's an FCC requirement... Ad content is referenced on page 2 near the bottom Jmb 4 Harris-Walz Oct 2024 #22
These knuckle-dragging men are really going crazy, trying to control us women kerry-is-my-prez Oct 2024 #11
That dick is still alive? NoRethugFriends Oct 2024 #12
He is telling the electorate what they are going to do if they get an office Clouds Passing Oct 2024 #13
I saw it in PA, it aired after The View. What a sick f*** that Randall Terry is ellemb Oct 2024 #14
I was just talking about him to someone. Cherrycheeks Oct 2024 #16
yep that is a lie that they are legally required to air the ad, same for all the stations around the country doing so. mahina Oct 2024 #20

FM123

(10,385 posts)
2. It was horrible.
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:44 PM
Oct 2024

I saw it here in South Florida too. Right before the noon news as I was getting ready to eat lunch. It was quite graphic. Even with the strong disclaimer it was much worse than I could have anticipated.

QED

(3,365 posts)
18. Yes...
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:06 PM
Oct 2024

It was very clear that the station was "required by federal law" to run the ad.

And yes, it was horrible!

keep_left

(3,223 posts)
6. I've heard of similarly outrageous stuff, just not nearly as graphic...
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:49 PM
Oct 2024

...being posted on advertising billboards around the country. Here's one example, equating those who support legal abortions with Hitler.

https://old.reddit.com/r/excatholic/comments/1fz9yru/these_fearmongering_ads_are_getting_out_of_hand/

rsdsharp

(12,093 posts)
7. That asshole is the founder of Operation Rescue. They would cause all kinds of trouble for abortion providers.
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:50 PM
Oct 2024

In the late 80s I was able to get an injunction against the local leader, preventing her from going onto Planned Parenthood property. When she violated it, I got her held in contempt, and jailed for 37 days.

kimbutgar

(27,555 posts)
9. That guys is a major kook
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:53 PM
Oct 2024

never heard of him but after looking into him, he is a major looney bird.

And those are not aborted fetuses up to 15 weeks it is a clump of cells.

 

Mosby

(19,491 posts)
15. Same here.
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:03 PM
Oct 2024

I think the truth is that they have to air some ads, but they have discretion.

mahina

(20,708 posts)
19. What if the political ad contained graphic sexual rather than violent and graphic images of death?
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:06 PM
Oct 2024

I highly doubt the doors are as wide open and the assertion makes them liars.

Torchlight

(7,055 posts)
21. I think according the FCC
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:11 PM
Oct 2024

network stations are prohibited from rejecting political ads that are paid for and sponsored by qualified candidates (this no-censorship provision does not apply to political ads that are sponsored by non-candidate third parties).

The ads must be run in their original form -- even if their content differs from the ordinary program content that the station would regularly air. A station is also prohibited from rejecting a political ad from a candidate -- despite its content.

On the other hand, broadcast stations are not responsible for the content of those particular political ads, even if the content may be "demonstrably false or defamatory" in nature.

kerry-is-my-prez

(10,333 posts)
11. These knuckle-dragging men are really going crazy, trying to control us women
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:56 PM
Oct 2024

They are absolutely hysterical! It’s almost enjoyable to see how desperate they are.

Clouds Passing

(8,192 posts)
13. He is telling the electorate what they are going to do if they get an office
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 02:59 PM
Oct 2024

The Nazis they are will kill babies

Cherrycheeks

(346 posts)
16. I was just talking about him to someone.
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:05 PM
Oct 2024

The other day. Is this the same guy who was protesting at the nursing home in the 80's,the same guy who made sure a couple of Drs got shot or killed?

mahina

(20,708 posts)
20. yep that is a lie that they are legally required to air the ad, same for all the stations around the country doing so.
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 03:09 PM
Oct 2024

This is not the individual sections but the overview. Here's what it doesn't say: all political ads need to be run without exception or consideration.

https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/privacy-civil-liberties/authorities/statutes/1288

The Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.

View Federal Statutes

Description
Background

The Communications Act of 1934 combined and organized federal regulation of telephone, telegraph, and radio communications. The Act created the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to oversee and regulate these industries. The Act is updated periodically to add provisions governing new communications technologies, such as broadcast, cable and satellite television.
General Provisions

The Communications Act, as amended, is an expansive statue regulating U.S. telephone, telegraph, television, and radio communications. Its seven subchapters regulate virtually all aspects of the communications and broadcasting industry, including assignment of frequencies, rates and fees, standards, competition, terms of subscriber access, commercials, broadcasting in the public interest, government use of communications systems. The Act also provides for more detailed regulation and oversight via the establishment of the FCC.
Of particular interest to the national security, law enforcement, and intelligence communities, the Act:
Requires that common carriers establish procedures to ensure “appropriate authorization to activate interception of communications or access to call-identifying information” and prevent unauthorized interception or access, and “to maintain secure and accurate records of any interception or access with or without such authorization,” 47 U.S.C. § 229; and

Allows the President to suspend or amend rules and regulations upon proclamation “that there exists a war or a threat of a war or state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency or if he deems it necessary in the interests of national security or defense.” The President may prioritize defense or security communications, authorize government use or control of communications facilities, and suspend or amend “rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations.” 47 U.S.C. § 606 (c), (d).
Amendments

The Communications Act has been amended by many acts of Congress since 1934, most extensively by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Amendments of particular interest to the national security, law enforcement, and intelligence communities were made by the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) and the USA PATRIOT Act.
Privacy and Other Civil Liberties

The Communications Act has several provisions that address customer privacy, access for individuals with disabilities, and nondiscrimination.
Customer Privacy – Section 222 requires telecommunications carriers to provide confidentiality for customer information as proprietary information of another common carrier. Carriers are prohibited from disclosing customer information except as required by law or with the customer's permission.

Exceptions:
There is an exception for disclosing the location of a mobile services user to medical, public safety, or law enforcement services where the user has called for emergency services.

Section 551 provides cable service subscribers with protection of their personally identifiable information.

There is an exception for disclosure to a government agency when that agency has appropriate authority under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act or the ECPA.
Access for Individuals with Disabilities – The Communications Act has multiple provisions that require carriers to provide accommodation for individuals with disabilities through technologies such as closed captioning and telephone typewriters. 47 U.S.C. §§ 225, 610-11, 613.
Nondiscrimination – Section 202 generally prohibits discrimination in rates or provision of services by common carriers against a “particular person, class of persons, or locality.” Section 554 requires cable companies to practice equal opportunity in employment with regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age, and sex.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OMG. I'm in Arizona... w...