General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA rated Monmouth Likeliest Voter Poll Harris 51% Trump 46%
https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_102324/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/ Rated 5 out of 280 polls . Top two percent. That's an A in my book.
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)calguy
(6,168 posts)and this is what you get. Kamala is winning, but still, take nothing for granted. Work like we're ten points behind!
DEM1955
(96 posts)Kamala is WAY ahead of the orange death.
samsingh
(18,469 posts)Tribetime
(7,145 posts)Ty for posting
Fiendish Thingy
(24,045 posts)Since 538 hasnt used letter grades for nearly two years.
If you wanted to make your headline reflect 538s rating, why not say highly rated Monmouth or #5 rated Monmouth? Both would be up to date, accurate descriptions.
In any case, unless more national LV polls from highly rated pollsters in the next few days also show Harris lead growing, Id say this 5 point margin (what was the MOE?) is an outlier.
EDIT: all results at link are for Registered, not Likely, voters, with a MOE of 4.1%. The Likeliest voter numbers you refer to are those who identified as highly motivated, which is a smaller subgroup of the whole sample with an even larger MOE.
We should not be duped into false despair nor lulled into false hope by polls that are clearly unable to ascertain with any accuracy the actual sentiment of the electorate.
The headline of the Monmouth poll report is Stable Uncertainty
Rumaging
(19 posts)# 5 is an A+
Fiendish Thingy
(24,045 posts)Rumaging
(19 posts)Good news is good news.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,045 posts)Even Monmouth acknowledges the lack of clarity in current polling.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,999 posts)If you're in the top two percent of your field from polling to plumbing you deserve an A.
Wanderlust988
(799 posts)No one on here needs to be told by YOU how to think about a poll. The OP posted a poll by a well known and respected pollster. If you don't agree with it, then that's your choice, but don't go telling people they are being duped or lulled. You are not some brilliant data wizard and we're a bunch of idiots. Talk about smug and condescending!
Fiendish Thingy
(24,045 posts)But I do have graduate level training in research analysis (my degree is in counseling psychology), but more importantly, I can read about and accept the uncertainty created by the current broken polling system.
I highly recommend this article on the broken polling system:
https://prospect.org/politics/2024-09-25-polling-imperilment/
Also, veteran Democratic operative Simon Rosenberg over at the Hopium Chronicles has written extensively about the corrupt manipulations of polling averages by Red Wave pollsters. Rosenberg is as optimistic as they come, but his optimism is based on verifiable reality, not vibes and feels from flawed polls.
It doesnt serve our cause for folks to ride the poller coaster of emotions created by flawed polls and the media narratives created by them. Polling is broken, nobody knows what the final outcome will be , but we do know this much:
We have a far superior ground game
There is tremendous enthusiasm both at Harris rallies and in early voting figures.
DU is a discussion board, and, just like you, Im discussin stuff.
Just because Im acknowledging the uncomfortable reality about the uncertainty of the next two weeks doesnt mean Im smug or condescending.
Consider it a splash of cold water to keep us on our toes.
Rumaging
(19 posts)Wisdom is not putting them in your cornflakes. Or anyone else's.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,045 posts)Pointing out a tomato is a fruit does not force anyone to put them in their cornflakes, but pointing out a tomato is indeed a tomato and not a giant strawberry, may help them from putting tomatoes in their cornflakes.
Rumaging
(19 posts)Be well.
SoFlaBro
(3,808 posts)Quixote1818
(31,158 posts)WarGamer
(18,855 posts)Johnny2X2X
(24,433 posts)Still, good result.
WarGamer
(18,855 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,847 posts)2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)I love the happy spin though. And I feel a momentum, but I think Im cautious in believing its a wave.
And yes, I have Hillary PTSD.
lees1975
(7,188 posts)What in the heck are people thinking? And how the heck are they prioritizing their votes?
Across the board, for several weeks, national polls, minus red wave polls, have been pretty consistent with a 51-46 theme. I notice on some of the YouGov polls, and a few Morning Consult, the larger the sample the bigger the Harris lead. And after a list appeared here identifying the red wave polls, I look at the ones that aren't identified that way and they have a common theme. She's leading by at least a point or more in every swing state, 2 in a couple, 3 in at least two, and the numbers are not really bouncing up and down.
I don't know how the composites "average" their data, if they weigh bigger polls more than smaller ones, because I added everything up and divided by the number of polls I counted and it didn't match their number. I came up with, guess what, 51-46 on the national polls and where Pennsylvania now shows her a couple of tenths of a point behind, I got 51-47. But I haven't trusted the polls since the Red Tsunami 2022, so there you have it.