General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Joe Use His New Supreme Court Approved Immunity Power
to put down any insurrection activity by the convicted felon when he loses?
If yes, what sort of action should he take?
I think Joe may have a huge role to play to insure a peaceful transition.
verargert
(142 posts)Farmgirl1961
(1,665 posts)If you remember, the last election TFG was in the WH (I will never refer to him as my president) and refused to leave...this time around, he's trying to crawl is way back in, but Joe Biden IS our president and so yes, I think you are absolutely correct in that Joe may very well have a HUGE role to play in making sure there is a peaceful transition.
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)If he fails to keep us safe and free, it will impact his legacy. Frankly, trump should already be in prison right now.
bdamomma
(69,532 posts)loves his country, he already told us that when he endorsed VP Harris.
dalton99a
(94,115 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/22/trump-attacks-harris-racist-stereotype-florida/
Kid Berwyn
(24,395 posts)President Biden will do whatever is needed to uphold, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. If that means arresting 2/3 of the Supreme Court, so be it.
Thank you for putting it in words, the_liberal_grandpa. A hearty welcome to DU!
brush
(61,033 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 23, 2024, 04:10 PM - Edit history (1)
around the SCOTUS 6's intent to help trump with their own weapon...impunity from official acts...which means Biden can officially control any insurrection attempts by trump maga loyalists after he loses the Nov. election.
Joe will use it wisely if necessary. If contingency plans are being made for just such occasions as we speak.
Telling Kavanagh, Barrett and Gorsuch to resign under threat of arrest for lying to Congress and send them to a dark site for cult deprogramming. Then have Joe appoint 3 honest people to replace them. Sounds like official President stuff to me.
brush
(61,033 posts)tritsofme
(19,900 posts)In response to an insurrection?
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)lets get people all worked up. - - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)it's like a certain percentage of us are really looking forward to ...
(just like the MAGA crazies ..? )
Srkdqltr
(9,760 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)...an insurrection WITHOUT breaking any laws. He won't need immunity for fulfil his Constitutional obligations.
H2O Man
(79,051 posts)wnylib
(26,012 posts)It's part of the job, consistent with his oath to defend the constitution.
So I question why the OP mentions "immunity power" and implies that action would be illegal without it.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Or at least, thats how it seems.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)ordinary law enforcement is quite good enough. Thanks.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)The Wizard
(13,735 posts)so long as Trump leaves the country and never returns. Trump must also make a public apology for siding with Putin and attempting to undermine the United States for profit / rubles.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)He would never agree to the Putin/profit stuff (or leaving, for that matter), so the point is really moot, but Trump's proximity has nothing to do with the amount of damage he could do, because the internet exists.
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)from taking over the country needs to be done. Use the national guard first then if that doesn't work call in the armed forces.
Heck I'd support the military taking over the country, before Trump even if he wins. At least it's leaders aren't dangerously mentally ill.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)on Democratic Underground- will wonders never cease?
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)Trump is dangerously deranged. At least our military leaders won't hand over the country to Vladimir Putin. They aren't insane like Donny is. Even if he croaked or the 25th ammendment was used against him then we'd get Vance another, younger lunatic, no thanks. I want sane and intelligent people in control.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)nor acting in the way we have condemned Republicans for acting...
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)anyway. I trust the U.S. military to protect human rights more than a narcissistic lunatic.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)If Harris loses the EC, we can just storm the capitol on January 6, steal the votes and install Harris as President. Doesn't that seem more democratic?
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)wins and is allowed to take office Democracy will aleady dead on arrival? There will be nothing we can do to prevent his agenda once he takes control. Do you honestly think you can trust the SC6 or Mike a magat controlled congress to stop him or protect anyone's rights who isn't a white male Trump cult member?
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)lord, deliver us ...
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)wants to take basic human rights away from anyone who isn't a white male cult member.
My point is I don't think it's right if this country lets tsf or anyone do the type of things Hitler did to the Jews in Germany, and just shrug our collective shoulders, and say well he won the election so we need to "honor the results." He and his maga cultists are already talking about prison camps, treating women like cattle, punishment for political enemies even though they've broken no laws, persecuting gays or people of alternate religions. I believe they have every intention of doing those things, if he becomes President again.
I am not okay with people saying well if he wins the election we have to follow the rules, even if the other side breaks them without consequences, and no matter what he does to other innocent people because our fighting back in defense would be wrong, even it was to save others lives.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)BlueKota
(5,345 posts)Trump, Hitler, or Stalin? Even if he had th
ultimate power he wouldn't put Jews, or Muslims in concentration camps simply because they practice a different religion. He wouldn't force gay people into conversion camps where they use violence to achieve submission. Neither would Kamala Harris. Trump would and will, if given a chance. He even admits it.
Tsf is a clear and present danger to anyone who isn't a member of his cult, and it's not just the media or Democrats saying it. Other Republicans and U.S. Generals are warning us. Are the exaggerating? He has already proven to be traitor to this country on January 6, and will end up destabilizing not only the U.S. but the entire world if allowed back in office.
Are you honestly willing to have everyone sit back and let him do whatever he damn well pleases to anyone? What about the lives of the people he will destroy? Do they matter less than trying to breathe life back into a system that will already be in ashes the minute he is sworn in?
How do you propose we protect the rest of us from him once he has ultimate power because a magat congress and SC will likely grant him exactly that. I would really like to hear your answers to how he would be prevented from becoming another Hitler or Stalin if re-elected if we have to follow the rules but he doesn't?
bdamomma
(69,532 posts)We have President Biden now, and we will have VP Harris as President.
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)isn't allowed to cheat with SC assistantance.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)As was alluded to above, let's just replace their dictator with ours! Uh, huh.
Asserting that we should use the tactics of Trump and his minions as the basis for our own behavior is always a losing argument.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)unless we lose, then authoritarianism looks just fine
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)If we believe it's wrong when Trump does it, it's still wrong if a Democratic president does it.
Sounds simplistic and a little obvious, but it's interesting how many times something we (correctly) rail against is suggested as a solution to a problem. The GOP spreads propaganda and disinformation, so we should, too. They lie in their ads, so we should, as well. Trump is willing to do anything to retain power. We should do the same if he wins.
Nah, we're supposed to be the rational party, the counter to the craziness. Becoming that which we hate kind of defeats the purpose.
All that being said, I think a lot of it is just born out of frustration with what the other side gets away with. That part, I get.
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)you end up with a dictatorship. I trust the leadership of our military to uphold civil rights more than him. I have a gay man who is one of my best friends, my second cousin's daughter is a lesbian, woman are aleady dying and being treated like criminals because of the Trump owned SC. Don't people care what will happen to minorities and women under Donny?
If Vice President Harris wins, there won't be an issue, but if he wins make no mistake project 2025 will be enacted, so I stand by my feelings that whatever the Democratic leaders, law enforcement, and the military need to do to stop him and his cult, they need to do.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)to keep him from being President but will robotically follow orders if he is the President?
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)he has already said as much. Plus again he has enough Republicans in Congess to stop any legislation to reign him in from passing, and he owns the SC majority. There will be nothing that can be done to stop him, if he is allowed to take power again.
Too many people are still trusting norms will be obeyed no matter which side is in charge and that's simply not true. The magats are outright declaring what they will do. People who think they won't actually do it given the chance are kidding themselves.
Anyway I am done arguing. I spent two years of my life studying what Hitler and Stalin did to their own citizens. I will never be okay with this country not doing everything it can to prevent a literal monster who shares many traits with them from taking over. End of my story.
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)will already be dead anyway. He will install his dictatorship as promised. Who will stop him? The Congress, which contains his magat buddies? The Supreme Court who kisses his corpulent butt?
He says he will imprison our leadership or kill them. You are willing to let them kill our former Democratic leaders, gay people, enslave blacks again, turn women into hand maidens that are property to men? Is that the kind of country you want to live in without doing whatever it takes to prevent it?
You will just sit back and say we'll that's what people votes for?
BlueKota
(5,345 posts)I look at it as stopping someone who will endanger the very lives of anyone who isn't a white male Trump cultist. It's not about left or right, red or blue, it's about stopping America's version of Stalin or Hitler.
No one is making up or exaggerating what tsf and his cult will do to this country. They wrote it down in Project 2025. Trump says it in every speech. So I agree we vote and do everything we can to get VP Harris elected, but what happens if he wins or cheats? We all just sit back and let him do whatever the hell he wants too? Just like the Germans let Hitler do to the Jews in the Holocaust? Is that an acceptable outcome for purists? That's for sure not my idea of justice or morality.
samsingh
(18,426 posts)he can to save Democracy.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,234 posts)SCOTUS has ruled presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for official acts, but that doesnt give them any new powers.
Any orders a president gives must be carried out by hundreds, or even thousands of individuals who are not immune from criminal prosecution .
If another January 6 type insurrection occurs, Biden can use the powers a president has always had, such as activating the National Guard, to put down the insurrection.
No need to over (or in some cases, under) think this.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)The prevailing opinion seems to be that it allows any president to do anything he or she wants, regardless of circumstances.
It's odd, though not that surprising, I guess. We tend to lose a bit of perspective on all things Trump.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,511 posts)HE'S the one claiming HIS absolute immunity, and unfortunately, it kinda looks that way. Despite 34 felony convictions and too many additional crimes and outrages to list, he's bumbling along the campaign trail, with taxpayer paid security, lying, grifting, accusing, threatening.
Maybe.
onenote
(46,142 posts)BlueKota
(5,345 posts)didn't give him absolute immunity the SC6 at least successfully delayed the majority of his trials until after the election. That way if Trump wins he won't have to face any trials or potential prison time as long as he is President. So if he dies or gets his wish to abolish elections, and pardons himself, he essentially will not have to face any consequences for inciting January 6 or mishandling classified material, or endangering national security.
We all know President Biden would not be protected by the Magat court like that and most likely not even by liberal courts. So basically unless Trump loses he has blanket immunity anyway, even if he cheats to win.
Yet some still believe tsf will have his baser goals, held in check by Congress even with enough magat members to prevent impeachment, or the SC 6 who all just basically genuflect in front of him, and will do so even more if he is President again.
Many of the same type of people are also the ones who still believe those who have already demonstrated untrustworthy behavior, will actually uphold the law. The same ones who accuse those who believe in a higher power of having blind faith.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)He has plenty of power, already. He can just do what Trump refused to do in 2020 and January 2021. The insurrection at the Capitol would never have taken place had the National Guard been in place there.
That event has now been declared to be a Special Security Event, which enables a lot of enforcement that was not in place in January 2021. All legal and not requiring any special powers.
He can also direct Federal authorities to investigate any illegal activities during and after the election. Trump did not do that.
He can direct the DOJ to deal with potential issues in court, as well. You might remember that 60 federal courts threw out Trump's attempts to corrupt the 2020 election. He lost every case he brought, despite being POTUS. Biden will not do that. He won't have to.
So, the answer is NO! It's not needed. It's a different administration, with a different set of priorities. Watch and you'll see.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)the 1st 4 times it was proposed.
Hotler
(13,747 posts)The fascist have threatened millions of American people with military violence should he take office. There is your excuse. Now is not the time to worry about looking political.
onenote
(46,142 posts)Sure, Joe couldn't be prosecuted for ordering the arrest, but that doesn't mean the arrest would stand up to a due process challenge.
As others have pointed out, the lack of understanding of the immunity ruling is monumental, even here on DU.
Hotler
(13,747 posts)onenote
(46,142 posts)tritsofme
(19,900 posts)RJ_MacReady
(448 posts)If they attempted another Jan 6th type insurrection deploy the national gaurd with live ammo.
Jack Valentino
(5,011 posts)have any terrorist threat renditioned to Guantanamo in the middle of the night without any court action...
It would be sweet Karma to have the rather fascistic laws passed by Bush II,
used upon their latter ex-president and dictator wannabe...
This was legal before the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity---
by my IANAL legal interpretation.... heheh
OAITW r.2.0
(32,133 posts)tritsofme
(19,900 posts)yourout
(8,821 posts)Certify without court admissible evidence they will be jailed for an attempted coup.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)It is a job requirement that the Insurrectionist in Chief failed.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)....permission to do that illegal thing without fear of prosecution.
Personally, I prefer that he figure out a way to do something illegal (without fear of prosecution) that would result in the overturning of the immunity ruling. Poetic justice and all.