General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWashington Post editorial board under Will Lewis reportedly waffling on whether to make a presidential endorsement...

Link to tweet
elleng
(141,926 posts)riversedge
(81,542 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,633 posts)viva la
(4,637 posts)The LA Times editor resigned because the owner intervened and refused to let the paper endorse Harris.
To choose NOT to make an endorsement is to cow before the terror of (gag) Trump. Good lord. How craven are they.
Oh, I guess these billionaires aren't craven. They just want Trump to lower their taxes and give them govt business. Well, let's see how well their portfolios do when Trump crashes the economy with his confiscatory tariff demands.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)This is the same organization that documented more than 30,000 lies Trump told during his time in office. I don't see how they can possibly have anything to lose by endorsing Harris. The right already hates WaPo.
Blaukraut
(6,004 posts)Legacy media has pretty much chosen a side, and it's not the side of democracy.
Mme. Defarge
(9,053 posts)I will cancel my subscription.
Dave says
(5,468 posts)I already dropped the NYT. If I subscribed to the LA Times, I would have dropped them, too. If they dont endorse Harris, Im dropping the Post, too.
That leaves me with the Guardian for mainstream news.
Joinfortmill
(21,668 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)subscription faster then a New York minute.
Cha
(320,590 posts)Harris/Walz!
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)benefit from that endorsement.
Jose Garcia
(3,551 posts)Undecided voters are not going to be reading the opinion pages of the Post.
Wiz Imp
(10,416 posts)In a weird way, the LA Times non-endorsement may have worked to Kamala Harris advantage. I mean, how many people pay attention to newspaper endorsements, even from large papers? But by refusing to allow the endorsement to be published, the owner actually made news all over the country, outraging people who believe in Freedom of the Press and reaching a whole lot more people with the message that the LA Times editorial board "endorsed" Kamala Harris than a simple endorsement in the newspaper would have.
dweller
(28,692 posts)dickheads
✌🏻
highplainsdem
(63,104 posts)BeyondGeography
(41,199 posts)Bezos is fretting about his billions. Why would I continue to validate that?
Wonder Why
(7,232 posts)kysrsoze
(6,454 posts)And now people are seeing it.
malaise
(297,955 posts)Born in England and so loves his knighthood
The effin racist trash Mail on Sunday
In 1991, Lewis was hired as a finance reporter by The Mail on Sunday. In 1994 he left the tabloid to take a job in the Financial Times' investigative unit. He later became fund management correspondent and then mergers and acquisitions correspondent.
maxsolomon
(39,127 posts)The "Traitorous Fascist Scum" paper whole-heartedly endorsed Harris, while the other "Paper of Record" is waffling.
Maybe Arthur Sulzberger isn't the devil.
demmiblue
(39,943 posts)Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.