General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums‘Thanks for Ruining My Life’
Dec 10, 2012 12:00 AM EST
A teen tweets against her attackersand upends the courts.
Savannah Dietrich says she was furious when she blasted out a defiant tweet this summer, naming two boys who had sexually assaulted her. There you go, lock me up. Im not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell, the 16-year-old high-school student wrote.
Her green eyes lined with charcoal, hair swept aside into a loose braid, she recounts the June episode on a crisp fall day in her hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, sitting at a neighborhood coffee shop. Normally, an underage victim of sexual assault would not be named in these pages. But Dietrich wanted to go public.
Her ordeal began when two 16-year-old boys stripped off her bra and underwear after she had passed out at a party. The boys took turns pushing their fingers into her vagina, documenting their actions with cellphone photos. When Dietrich pressed charges, the boys pleaded guilty in a deal offered by the prosecutor, but she faced a new and unexpected problem: the judge ordered her not to talk about what had happened to heran apparent infringement of her right to free speech, according to legal experts and to Dietrich herself.
The court was trying to gag a victim, says her mother, Sharon Dietrich, to hide a crime.
The teen, already feeling that the boys were getting off easy under their plea agreement, started tweeting. Everyone thought I was this little girl they could intimidate, she says, with a slight Kentucky lilt.
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/12/09/thanks-for-ruining-my-life.html
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"Dietrichs team went after both judges and the prosecutor, requesting that all three be disqualified from the case. The prosecutor, they charged, was not objective. Turned out, he had attended the same high school as the boysTrinityand remained an active supporter, serving on a reunion committee and in an alumni society, according to court filings. The judges and prosecutor declined to comment for this story, as did Trinity."
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)I can't click on the link, but I would love to see that judge's name spelled out, as well as the prosecutor's name.
It's time to start shaming ignorant, perverted justice.
The boys and their legal help are all lower than pond scum.
And young women in that judge's district are at a distinct risk of being sexually assaulted, owning to the fact that the judge doesn't appear to give a shit about young women.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)We should be wary of private schools, because they love to make a little power clique that protects the rich caste from the consequences of their actions. Any surprise an Alumni is here to defend them, and from a Catholic School at that? You know, that Church that has protected child molesters, but threatens Nuns for being too lefty.
RC
(25,592 posts)The judge was trying to keep things quiet, being "PC", actually.
Savannah did the right thing by speaking out anyway. No "woe is me" whining here.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I guess lucky for you, you just didn't have to hear or see it.
I'm glad she had people to talk to who didn't call her a whiner.
GaYellowDawg
(4,447 posts)It's certainly not PC to protect rapists.
However, I think the poster you replied to was actually saying that she did not indulge in "woe is me" whining - e.g., "Savannah did the right thing by speaking out anyway. (There is) No "woe is me" whining here."
RC
(25,592 posts)Oh, yes it is. And the judge issued an injunction to keep the victim quiet. That is why it is PC. Censorship is basically what being PC is all about anyway.
The girl was victimized. - twice. First by the boys and the second time by the judge.
She had to work her way through both the insults to her self-esteem and to her body. She did, and came out the stronger for it.
There will be no repeat of mistakes for this young woman.
Seeing what she went through, she could have stayed curled up in a ball, feeling sorry for herself. She did not. She worked her way through the hurt and found a solution that worked quite well for her.
Give her credit for what she accomplished. It could not have been easy.
How do I have any insight on this? I raised my own two girls, from the ages of 3 and 5 myself. I came home from work, to a note that said my wife was leaving and the kids were at the babysitters. I was Mr. Mom for the next 17 years or so. And did a damn good job too.
My youngest just graduated with an engineering degree (4.0+) and is going to Fort Collins for a post graduate degree, tuition paid by the school she will be attending. You bet I'm proud.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Kudos.
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)progressoid
(49,990 posts)2naSalit
(86,600 posts)Slut-shaming should be a crime.
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)BTA, I have no problem locking up rethug slut-shamers. On top of that, slut-shaming ought to come also with having to register as a sex offender.
BWAHAHAHAH!!!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)to it. It is a travesty that it is done to protect someone other than the victim.
This Judge needs to be sanctioned for this.
backtoblue
(11,343 posts)edit: comments on link, not DU
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)comparison. Really awful what my fellow Americans can sometimes talk themselves into (like 'she deserved it b/c she drank too much' and such-like).
a society/culture. Nothing civil here. Pseudo-macho society that is basically mean. I hate this place at times. A lot of humans are just mean.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)It is not like they were innocent before being proven guilty. They were guilty.
I don't think there should be any confidentiality no matter what the crime is, just because it is juvenile court. So my position would be the same here even if we were talking about two kids who stole a six pack of beer from a drug store.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It would be disastrous if instead of learning why what they did is wrong, they turned to groups which insist that drunk women who get raped are only victims of their own "bad judgment".
This is the age range where most rapists start raping. Hopefully these boys will learn from this and never rape again.
http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)They start young and choose very, very young victims that they can overpower and terrorize one way or another to keep quiet.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I know I would have just lived with shame and never told anyone. Of course times have changed and if I was 16 today, maybe it would be different. I like to think us old feminists helped this girl in our fight for equality and justice.
Savannah is admirable!
dsc
(52,161 posts)since she couldn't possibly sue without discussing the crime. She also presumedly would be unable to get treatment either. A simply outrageous order that should be overturned.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Hekate
(90,678 posts)The whole thing is nauseating.
That young woman has guts.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)union_maid
(3,502 posts)What she's done makes it riskier for other boys to indulge in that kind of behavior. I hope that, eventually, she can put the trauma behind her and just be proud of herself and of her family. Her mother was no slouch in all this either.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts):applause
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)This woman refuses to play the victim and good for her. These guys are criminals.
InsultComicDog
(1,209 posts)WILL FREY and AUSTIN ZEHNDER
trumad
(41,692 posts)Fucking Pigs. If they did this to my beautiful daughter...they'd have to look over their shoulders the rest of their lives.