USA Today is not endorsing a presidential candidate this election.

[DEM1955]

USA Today, the nation’s fourth largest newspaper, says it’s joining The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times in not endorsing a presidential candidate this election.

What the hell?

[Beaverhausen]

1. Who did they endorse in 2020?

[DEM1955]

4. Joe Biden

[SheltieLover]

2. WTAF?????????

Just can't bring themselves to endorse a Black woman prosecutor who is a Democrat, can they?

[Dem4life1234]

3. They pick this critical election to act up

Wait so they never endorsed a candidate?

This article said they have never endorsed a candidate even though they trashed the orange fascist.


https://www.businessinsider.com/usa-today-endorsement-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-2016-9

[JohnSJ]

5. USA Today is a gossip rag, but F**K them anyway.

[Brainstormy]

15. right!

who cares who USA Today endorses.

[cyclonefence]

6. I've never thought of USA Today as a real newspaper

maybe because the same-day issue was available for free at every hotel I've every stayed at, all over the country. I think the fact that it's not *based* somewhere makes me (and the newspaper men and women I've know) dismiss its importance.

I would have been surprised if they *had* endorsed someone.

[getagrip_already]

8. Yeah, i always viewed it as the instant oatmeal of the news

And if there were such a thing zs artificial instant oatmeal, it would be that.

Tasteless, lumpy, slimey, no redeaming quality, you wish you hadnt eaten it.

[Permanut]

7. Perfectly understandable..

The two candidates are so alike, it's just about impossible to pick one over the other.

[kerouac2]

9. Washington post ia a trailblazer...

In capitulation

[0rganism]

10. You can smell the fear

It's not like they'd hesitate to endorse TSF if that was their intent. They obviously fear TSF's revenge should he be elected.

[sl8]

11. Where did you see this? It doesn't make sense. (updated)

On edit:
My mistake, they endorsed a candidate for the first time in 2020 (Biden).

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/opinion/todaysdebate/2020/10/20/elect-joe-biden-reject-donald-trump-editorials-debates/5919435002/

=========

They've never endorsed a presidential candidate in their history. It's seems odd that they would now say they're joining other papers in not endorsing, when that's always been their policy. If anything, the other papers are joining USA Today in adopting a non-endorsement policy.

They didn't endorse anyone in 2016, like all other elections, but they did tell readers not to vote for Trump.

https://www.businessinsider.com/usa-today-endorsement-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-2016-9

[Rebl2]

12. Just one

more cowardly news organization.

[LessAspin]

13. NYT Pitchbot

Link to tweet

[Johonny]

14. The print media is dead

And they seem to be making sure it dies.

[proud patriot]

16. Cowards

[FakeNoose]

17. Chicken shit! They know Kamala and Tim will win

They WANT Kamala and Tim to win ... but they're scared to go on the record for supporting them.



Just GTFOH!

[rurallib]

18. Owned by Gannett, correct?

So another corporate coward cowed by their fear of Trump. Surrender before the fight.

Maybe WaPo, LAT and USA T should be called the surrender press?

[Prairie_Seagull]

19. Profit over People.

Chickenshits. This could be a chance to pick up subscribers.

[Emile]

20. Apparently billionaire owners are unpatriotic cowards.

[Crunchy Frog]

21. I guess this election's just not all that important

compared with ones from the past 30 years.