General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (HagathaCrispy) on Mon Oct 28, 2024, 07:46 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
edhopper
(37,375 posts)It is common for all Cabinet members to offer their resignation when a new President comes in.
In other words, he's toast.
Response to HagathaCrispy (Original post)
Post removed
drray23
(8,785 posts)What kind of question is that?
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)drray23
(8,785 posts)Civic classes should be mandatory, yet they no longer are in most places. People who are frustrated at the lack of progress end up blaming democrats because they don't know how a law is enacted, passed and signed into law. The president cannot just make things happen. Congress barely can because of the filibuster.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)newdeal2
(5,437 posts)If R's have the majority, maybe or maybe better to keep him there for now.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)I'm really surprised there was no effort to root out the moles and seditionists.
LeftInTX
(34,317 posts)montanacowboy
(6,714 posts)can replace all those heads with her own team and please be sure to kick the FBI asshole out in the street along with Garland.
LeftInTX
(34,317 posts)It's a 10 year appt.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)but pushing crap like "he is a republican operative" is nonesense.
As far as "firing him", that isn't necessary.
Hopefully if VP Harris wins, it will be up to her as President to choose the Attorney General. There is no need for firing anybody.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)What is the point of firing Garland now?
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Garland serves at the pleasure of the president, he can be dismissed at any time.
This is beyond ridiculous.