General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat the hell is wrong with the word "crisp?"
Crispy, crispy, crispy.
What are we, a nation of four-year-olds?
And PS: there's no such word as "snuck." So stop saying it. Goddam it.
Arthur_Frain
(2,354 posts)I just woke up. Context would help, the fuck is wrong with crisp?
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)3catwoman3
(29,403 posts)This is news to me.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)MineralMan
(151,259 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I'm talking about conjugations.
Sneak, sneaked, sneaked.
Not sneak, snack, snuck.
-misanthroptimist
(1,615 posts)Emile
(42,283 posts)Srkdqltr
(9,758 posts)BTW. What are you talking about?
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)"shrunk" (in some context, like 'Honey I Shrunk the Kids') has replaced "shrank"
"crispy" has replaced "crisp"
"vers" has replaced "versus"
etc etc etc
I do not object or care when people speak or write informally--I do it and enjoy doing it--but proper usage is disappearing from our language, and it ought to be preserved somewhere, somehow. In even the most formal writing, I have come across "snuck." And I weep.
I object to the fact that dialectical, informal usage is becoming--has become--pretty much formalized.
I want an American Academie Francaise, is what I want. And I'll be in charge. And penalties will be fierce.
And never begin a sentence with "and."
Jerry2144
(3,272 posts)May not be standard English, but it gets the point across.
I'm old enough now to not worry some much about right and wrong in the way people speak/write. I worry more about can I understand. Only things that still bother me are misue use of: there/their/they're, your/you're, to/too/two, and similar easy homophones
whathehell
(30,468 posts)"It may not be standard English, but it gets the point across".
I'm not sure about that one..It gets no points across to me..It's entirely indeciferable.
Jerry2144
(3,272 posts)About the bedtime story his father brought upstairs
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Annoying as hell gives me a mental stutter when I read.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)"Sneaked" is replacing "snuck", but before that "snuck" replaced "sneaked" in the US. "Sneaked" remains the usage in the UK. Canada tends to "snuck". (Canadian English is a mixture of US and UK where they differ.)
Verbs are becoming regularized these days because of the effect of English-as-an-alternate-language speakers/writers. Because of telecommunications, lots of people are writing on the internet (and before) with English not their first language. When in doubt about a verb it is a good bet to use regularized conjugations because it is A) likely to be right, B) simpler.
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)but dictionaries are not guides to usage. Dictionaries define words so other people know what the hell you're talking about when you say "snuck" instead of "sneaked."
My OED does not contain the word "snuck." I am surprised to learn from you that the form existed in the US in the 19th C. Unfortunately the Dictionary of American Slang did not print a volume containing S words, or I'd be able to cite you an example, if such an example exists.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Dictionaries only describe. Further, my OED is probably same as your OED and "sneaked" is not defined in it either.
Are you British? Americans should always use the British / UK form?
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)A long way from Albion.
The OED contains "sneak," of course, but it isn't a guide to verb forms, either. I think "snuck"--if it were in use--would have made an appearance if it had appeared in print in the 19th C in England simply because it is not standard usage and might have confused people.
wnylib
(26,008 posts)He used self-created words and new meanings for existing words in his plays. His new usages became standard English due to the popularity of his plays.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...and it was great fun!
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I do not object to *any* words or usage. I object to the fact that simple words like "crisp" are disappearing from our language. If you pay attention you won't *ever* hear "crisp" these days. Everything crisp is described as "crispy."
I repeat, what are we, a nation of four-year-olds?
Ditto for "veggies," btw.
NotANeocon
(465 posts)I wouldn't expect a person requesting a crisp or a package of crisps in a UK pub to be at the infantile end of the age scale!
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)Over here in the US, we'd probably say "crispies." That's what I call infantile. We seem to want to avoid the adjective "crisp."
wnylib
(26,008 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)And I think that's fine. Let's just not lose some of the useful words we have.
radius777
(3,921 posts)and other companies over the years marketing their products. 'Crispy' just sounds more appetizing and crispier than 'crisp'.
Polly Hennessey
(8,832 posts)Dont recall ever ending a sentence with and. Oh, wait, I just did. 😁
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)jfz9580m
(17,188 posts)When I read the net I can see why sitcoms have canned laughter ;-/
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)Today I shrink the kids
Yesterday I shrank the kids
I have shrunk the kids many times
Ocelot II
(130,516 posts)They become words because people use them. Snuck is an accepted past tense of sneak, and has been for more than 100 years. https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/snuck-or-sneaked-which-is-correct
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I'm distressed because "snuck" has replaced the more proper "sneaked" in virtually every instance. I don't mind that people use these more casual forms of words; I mind that the strictly correct forms are disappearing, even from formal writing.
Ocelot II
(130,516 posts)But sneak bucks the trend. Over the past 120-odd years snuck has become by some estimations the more common past tense form in the US. Some people object to the sneaky upstart especially speakers of British English but it appears regularly and without commentary in respected publications on both sides of the pond.
Perhaps the most mysterious part of the story of snuck is the question of where it came from. No common verb follows the precise pattern of snuck: the past tense of leak is not luck, of streak is not struck, of creak is not cruck, of peek is not puck. It's as if snuck just sidled on in and made itself at home in the language, and most of us took it for a native. Pretty sneaky.
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)Born in 1956.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)And has been for a century.
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)It's like trying to conjugate brought
H2O Man
(79,048 posts)Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)You just dont like the word. And the correct way to talk changes very frequently and grammar books always catch up.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Librarians, grammarians, and lexicographers can guide usage, but prescribing and proscribing language is as useless as whipping the sea.
I didn't see your post link until I posted mine.
Ligyron
(8,006 posts)I know of kids using it as such anyway.
liberalla
(11,088 posts)However, I'm curious what "crisp" word the OP is referring to, and where it was used. I mean, what is this thread about anyway?
Ligyron
(8,006 posts)stumpysbear
(277 posts)toesonthenose
(188 posts)Marthe48
(23,175 posts)I thought it was strange.
toesonthenose
(188 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,956 posts)Marthe48
(23,175 posts)My daughter friended them on fb to be nice. When I heard how crappy they made the workplace, I started to describe everything I could using the word moist if I posted on her fb page.
My daughter took another job where the office environment was much more pleaseant and as they say, living well is the best revenge--she retired almost 2 years ago
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I knew a guy who couldn't tolerate "moist" or "seepage." Maybe a traumatic plumbing experience?
Akacia
(651 posts)Polly Hennessey
(8,832 posts)I love crispy chips.
Mossfern
(4,715 posts)Or is that the wrong "crisp?"
I guess if you're strolling through piles of fallen leaves, it could be considered "crispy" as well.
ornotna
(11,479 posts)That makes me moist.
bluesbassman
(20,384 posts)I never understood that either, so I guess this too shall pass.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)They're just not as vocal about it, so it faded from the social media consciousness a bit.
Some other shiny object replaced it.
bluesbassman
(20,384 posts)Its a pretty good word. Who doesnt like a moist cake, or moist lips, as opposed to dry? I guess I need to get out more.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)But I have friends who literally recoil from the word. It's almost a subconscious reaction.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)Moooyyyest. I dont really get why its a big deal, but there you have it.
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)It became sexual in the 70s and has gained sexual traction since.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)But I also think its the weird sound.
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)and therefore in the minds of tween boys (and people who haven't really moved on from the tween boy mentality in this area) it is "gross" because "yuck, girl stuff".
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)radius777
(3,921 posts)Maybe it's generational, I'm gen-x (ie middle aged) and grew up with TV commercials marketing 'moist chocolate chip cookies', 'moist and gooey brownies', etc... nobody I know has ever objected to that word. Cooking shows routinely use 'moist' to describe food.
And as far as how it's used to describe female sexuality - people don't view 'moist' in that context to be gross - but hot and sexy.
IOW, in both the culinary and sexual contexts of the word it's viewed to be a good and desirable quality.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)It seems to cover the generational spectrum and numerous articles have been written on the subject.
Here's one about the science behind it: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/64984/science-behind-why-people-hate-word-moist
And a video:
Rebl2
(17,738 posts)a moist piece of chocolate cake.
bluesbassman
(20,384 posts)Yum!
Aristus
(72,178 posts)bluesbassman
(20,384 posts)But when I do, I just remember what it was like going through puberty during those years.
Now a fifty year old guy with a moist handshake? That does creep me out a little.
chowder66
(12,240 posts)I thought it was pretty weird. In Los Angeles of all places!!
yorkster
(3,832 posts)fer crissakes...
I know I know it's from gaming yadda yadda.
OK mini rant over.
I crisply snuck in a diversion...
but do want to know from whence this sprung. 🤔
canetoad
(20,769 posts)For drawer.
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I believed that piece of furniture was "Chester Drars."
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)and today, for some reason, it reached a breaking point. I probably saw a cooking show where something was described as "crispy," when it was clearly "crisp." "Crispy," like "veggies," strikes me as infantile. Why don't people use the word "crisp" any more?
Plus, I'm so goddam tired of Trump. Reached that breaking point five years ago.
yorkster
(3,832 posts)and things were never the same. Crunchy had spunk and crisp wanted some of that and just plain took it.
Now as for me, I hate scrumptious, which brings up memories of my otherwise happy childhood. Mostly telly memories of 50s housewives and poor women with bad hairdos in mink coats standing by gleaming appliances because they were queen for a day. That's what you saw if you were sick on the couch and not in school.
The silly programs had ads for "scrumptious" desserts,.
As a kid, I felt badly for those women. It was a scam. Lives would not be changed
and soon everything would revert to what it was before the lady won the prize.
Thank gawd for Dave Garroway and Adlai Stevenson. ..
But, I digress, she said, long after the digression became the main event...
See what "mindfields" your
post brought out. Ain't words wunnerful?
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)"Queen for a Day" was indeed what I watched when I was home sick. I remember my poor grandmother, whose husband--the person I loved most in the world--had been killed in a locomotive explosion (he was the engineer), saying "They don't know what sad is" about the women who competed with each other for a new wardrobe presented by Mary Cagney.
yorkster
(3,832 posts)You never know when you say or write something, the precise way it will affect someone or, in this case, have such
unexpected relevance.
On another note, take care and let us hope
that Tuesday will bring good news for all of us.
3catwoman3
(29,403 posts)as often happens on various of the cooking shows. Its original negative meanings (oily, greasy, slick, smug, excessively pious) for either a physical substance or a behavior/demeanor are so firmly fixed in my brain that hearing it used to describe a pleasing oral sensation just feels wrong.
yorkster
(3,832 posts)word, also Pence, Vance, etc.
Can't imagine any positive association with unctuous.
Wonder if it's an archaic usage that's been
"exhumed"?
retread
(3,922 posts)Jerry2144
(3,272 posts)RoadRunner
(4,719 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)It's informal and/or dialectal. Who would've thunk it?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/who-would-ve-thunk-it
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/thunk
Aristus
(72,178 posts)Sometimes, when Ive slipped into my Texas accent, I will playfully say something like brung instead of brought, because it fits the drawl. I know perfectly well what the proper past tense is; Im just having fun.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)It's dialectal and informal, but still a word.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/brung
Recent examples in the media:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/brung#examples
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)Bring, brang, done brought. Didn't you go to school at all?
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(14,361 posts)"ooey-gooey". That one makes me want to puke.
chowder66
(12,240 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)"Crispy" is the first step on the path to "ooey-gooey." Is there no hope for us?
GreenWave
(12,640 posts)
Find the dad and mystery solved.
Mark.b2
(797 posts)Even news people are saying it as impor-ant.
rog
(944 posts)... that's driving me crazy right now.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Clinon
Bill and Hillary Clinn
When did that happen? Was it regional? Because it sure has spread.
Mark.b2
(797 posts)electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)yorkster
(3,832 posts)Or the boddom line. And so it goes...
miyazaki
(2,649 posts)-even though i can't afford it anymore. sad.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,635 posts)
Ilsa
(64,363 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)Ilsa
(64,363 posts)I love the lightness of the KrKr, especially if they've been heated 6 sec in the microwave.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)3catwoman3
(29,403 posts)Dense, heavy and substantial. And moist -
boston bean
(36,930 posts)msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)I'm like wtf is this about politically. Now I understand it's a personal complaint of no significance in reference to current events.
debm55
(60,568 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)displacedvermoter
(4,495 posts)and the weather in Burlington right now is crisp. That is OK usage, right?
sl8
(17,110 posts)Skip to 1:15:
Youtube / Conan O'Brien
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)Thanks. You made my day.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I don't object to those forms per se but to the fact that those (imo improper) forms displaced the proper (again, imo) forms, forms that can be conjugated.
No one says "crisp" any more. What's wrong with "crisp?" Although I haven't heard anyone say "It was a crispy fall day," I fear that's just around the corner. If global warming ever allows us to have crisp fall days again.
Every damn thing that's crisp, particularly foodstuffs, is described as "crispy."
I'm just a crank, I guess, with too much time on my hands.
But Jennifer Garner, of all people.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)"Crispy" means "crisp-like but not truly crisp".
Like "cranky" means "crank-like" without actually being truly a crank.
Judi Lynn
(164,122 posts)being used to attract hungry gluttons even more to think of potato chips, or cereal, or something. Standard, commonly used words wouldn't work well enough for them, apparently.
It has made me sick every time I've heard it since then. "Snuck" also has driven me around the bend, every time.
Hearing sudden, absurd, nonsensical phrases or terms as they arrive, like "pushing the envelope" and other empty, blank, stupid contrivances get picked up and used, as if they actually have meaning other people understand is disgusting and odd, also.
Thank you. You were never alone with this, even if it seemed that way!
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)It's you and me and Jennifer Garner.
sl8
(17,110 posts)I thought she pulled it off very well, though.
MineralMan
(151,259 posts)The language is English, and in England, crisps are snacks like American chips. It is difficult to eat a single crisp, of course, but one can do it in a pinch.
Chips are what we call fries here in the colonies.
The language is English, so we should be able to accept the language as it is spoken in England, I think.
Speaking of which, I think I left a packet of crisps in the boot of my saloon car. I'm a bit peckish, so I'll be right back.
Dear_Prudence
(1,172 posts)On 16 years on DU as of today, Nov 2. Keep on keeping on!
MineralMan
(151,259 posts)That's quite a long time, isn't it?
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)"Our speech is not wimpy"
My response:
"Why do you call the hood of a car a bonnet?"
MineralMan
(151,259 posts)A convertible coupe is called a "drop head coupe."
New technology demands new names, but the British always used familiar names from related vehicles. So, a sedan became a "saloon car." Because a "sedan" is a closed carriage carried by people. None of it makes much sense, really.
dweller
(28,408 posts)Lettuce ?!?1!
🫤
✌🏻
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)marble falls
(71,919 posts)ananda
(35,140 posts)that used to be considered bad English, have become the
norm today.
One example is that what used to be spelled "led" is now
spelled "lead," meaning the past tense of lead.
People also now say "bored of" instead of "bored with."
And there are many many others.
My advice: just go with the flow.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)If we use your proscriptive logic, there is no verb "goddam". You should know better and write it "god damn". If you believe there is a god or there are gods or doGs or ceiling cats.
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)I'm not opposed to slang, or neologisms, or any kind of informal grammar--and I don't care if people misplace apostrophes (actually, a misplaced apostrophe might prejudice me against wanting to know someone)--I truly don't. I just don't want the standard words, especially verb forms, to be erased from the earth. And I'm afraid that's what's happening. Goddammit.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)Spelling and usage constantly change. They start in informal conversation and work their way into formal rules. If we wanted the original, standard form of English, no one here would understand a word.
Island Blue
(6,287 posts)
muriel_volestrangler
(106,201 posts)https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=crisp%2Ccrispy&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en-US&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false
The Oxford English Dictionary admitted 'snuck' into the lexicon in 1998: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/12/26/it-snuck-into-the-oed/2feebed5-7dce-451f-8d97-426ded921166/
The first written use of "sneaked" or "snuck" was "sneaked", but not until the 1830s: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278394686_How_snuck_sneaked_into_English_and_drug_is_still_dragging_behind_A_corpus_study_on_the_usage_of_new_past_tense_forms_for_sneak_and_drag_in_British_and_American_English
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/crispy_adj
cyclonefence
(5,151 posts)in actual writing, but rather one translator's saying that "crispy" is derived from "crisp." No evidence that it was actually used that way. If you can find an actual text using the word "crispy" from ME, please send it to me. I'm not being a snot--I majored in Medieval Studies and studied ME for a couple of years. I truly would like to see that word used actually any time before, say, 1750. I believe it is a modern abomination.
My print copy of the OED does not contain this citation.
And, as I keep saying, I don't care if people use it--I have no aversion to the word itself--except for the fact that the word "crisp"--a perfectly good word, and a syllable shorter--is apparently disappearing from English usage.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,201 posts)The OEDs earliest example is from an anonymous Old English translation (circa 900) of Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum, a Latin church history written in the eighth century by the Anglo-Saxon monk Bede:
...
When the adjective crispy appeared in the late 14th century, Oxford says, it also referred to curly hair: By grete heete the heer of the berd and of the heed ben cryspy and curlyd. From John Trevisas 1398 Middle English translation of De Proprietatibus Rerum (On the Order of Things), an encyclopedic Latin work compiled in the 13th century by the medieval scholar Bartholomeus Anglicus.
https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2019/09/crisp-crispy.html
The NGrams graph shows that "crisp" is increasing in use. It's just that "crispy" is increasing faster.
gay texan
(3,216 posts)nolabear
(43,850 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)That's an example of informal usage.
Just like "snuck" is informal usage.
Perhaps, it was ironic?
ForgedCrank
(3,093 posts)raked over the coals as a youngster for not using proper structure or vocabulary. My dad "didn't want us sounding like uneducated idiots".
I've graduated from that. I use a lot of slang, and I use a lot of words that many outsiders find odd, it's a culture of language and where I am from. but I never write that way for some reason. I don't see anything wrong with "snuck". We all know what it means, it's well established and accepted. As long as I don't say "ain't got no..." in front of my dad, everything is well.
3catwoman3
(29,403 posts)
was also very particular about language use - this kind/these kinds etc, etc, etc. Her mom was also a nurse, and her dad a dentist, so Im not sure from whence her standards originated.
Wherever they came from, I was sufficiently conditioned to have the same standards. I, too, am a nurse, although I sometimes feel sure I must have been an English teacher or editor in a past life. Todays sloppy speech and writing drives me crazy. Especially people using him/her/me when it should be he/she/I - Him and me went to the movies.
Aauuugggghhhhh -
notroot
(267 posts)I still rarely use it except for color.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,201 posts)"Am I not?" would be the "full" way of saying it, nor "are I not?"
notroot
(267 posts)There was a stigma attached to both people who used "ain't", and to those who thought it was wrong. LOL. I just happened to fall into the latter category.
I use it now, but not as a manner of speech. More as a colloquialism, like "ain't that something".
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)As for the color, are you referring to haint? Haint blue is a color traditionally used in a lot of porch ceilings in the South. It has a lot of history and cultural significance.
notroot
(267 posts)Mom thought it was "hick" and wouldn't let us use it.
By "color" I mean rhetorical color.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)It wasn't at all clear that you meant only in your personal experience.
It's best avoided in professional writing because it's informal, but in conversation, ain't is culturally extensive and has been for centuries. Its usage is very common in much of rural - and often very white - America, especially in places like the Upper Midwest. The common assertion that it's the purview of the ignorant is, in itself, quite ignorant.
notroot
(267 posts)I ain't interested, anymore.
Byeeeee
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Maybe it has the 2024 ick factor that moist used to have haha
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Lots of people still hate it. Tons of articles, etc., have been written on the science behind it.
Example: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/64984/science-behind-why-people-hate-word-moist
And a video:
Renew Deal
(85,145 posts)You might be 500 years late with this complaint.
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/sneak_v?tab=factsheet#22148774
PJMcK
(25,048 posts)you sure got a lot of replies!
samnsara
(18,767 posts)..and People are HANGED
has that changed in a million years?
Croney
(5,017 posts)if English is not your first language! You have to say crizz-puisss. Ugh.
What I really hate is "invite" used as a noun.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)OED's earliest evidence for invite is from 1615, in the writing of George Sandys, writer and traveller.
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/invite_n?tl=true
Croney
(5,017 posts)At that and this entire thread.
I had no idea that people were grossed out by the word moist though I've certainly seen it take on an overly sexual connotation. I wonder if they object to the words moisturize and moisture.
First thing that comes to mind for the word crisp is a British name for a potato chip. I also like crisp celery, carrots and lettuce. I like my pizza crust on the crispy side, as well as my cookies.
The word I HATE is "whilst", especially if an American says or writes it. Inexcusable.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,201 posts)Or, really, "rasps", "asps", "clasps", and so on.
Croney
(5,017 posts)English can be challenging.
jfz9580m
(17,188 posts)But I like it
..
I like your style cyclonefence
!
Btw while I agree about crispy, I thought snuck was not wrong.