Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(31,059 posts)
Mon Nov 25, 2024, 04:56 PM Nov 2024

Mueller, She Wrote: THREAD: Today is a sad day for justice

Mueller, She Wrote‬
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
28m
THREAD: Today is a sad day for justice. Jack Smith and the DoJ are bound by the Constitution to dismiss the charges against Trump. It's unlikely that charges will be brought again in four years, but the DoJ doesn't want to close the door completely and has asked for dismissal without prejudice. 1/

Mueller, She Wrote‬ ‪
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
27m
Starting last year, the Supreme Court stepped in and delayed the trial, which was scheduled for March, 2024. Were it not for the Supreme Court, the trial would have concluded well before the election. 2/

‪Mueller, She Wrote‬ ‪
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
27m
But this past July, the court decided that Trump is a king, significantly delaying the trial again. Even if Trump hand't been elected, we still would not see a trial for at least another year, and that's IF the Supreme Court agreed with the immunity determinations from Judge Chutkan. 3/

‪Mueller, She Wrote‬ ‪
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
27m
And if Judge Chutkan grants the DoJ's motion to dismiss without prejudice, and even if a new DoJ in 2029 decides to bring the charges again, DoJ would have to ask the corrupt Supreme Court to toll the statute of limitations. I doubt they would. 4/

Mueller, She Wrote‬ ‪
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
26m
There is literally nothing the DoJ could have done to make this trial happen in the face of the Supreme Court.

Nothing.

Nor is there anything they could do now that wouldn't have to be considered by the Supreme Court. 5/

‪Mueller, She Wrote‬
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
26m
Even if Garland had appointed a Special Counsel in 2021. Even if he didn't have 8 reluctant but crucial witnesses stall the case for over a year while they claimed executive privilege. Even if we had been told loudly about all of it. The Supreme Court got the final say. 6/

‪Mueller, She Wrote‬
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
26m
That is why elections have consequences. We lost in 2016 and ended up with a corrupt Supreme Court as a result. We lost in 2024 and ended up with a constitutionally immune president-elect instead of a trial. 7/

Mueller, She Wrote‬
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
26m
All of this rests squarely at the feet of a handful of corrupt justices, installed by billionaires who want their specific presidents to be above the law. 8/

‪Mueller, She Wrote‬
@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
26m
Many folks ask why Biden isn't using his immunity to do something. That's because it's not "his" immunity. It's the Supreme Court's. The justices set it up in such a way that THEY decide on a case-by-case basis which president is immune for what act. 9/

Mueller, She Wrote
‪@muellershewrote.bsky.social‬
I doubt Leonard Leo's SCOTUS would grant the same immunity to Biden that they granted to Trump. THEY decide. So you can blame who you like, but for me, the blame belongs with the court. No matter who indicted Trump or when, SCOTUS was not going to let Trump be prosecuted. Period. END/
November 25, 2024 at 3:25 PM


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller, She Wrote: THREAD: Today is a sad day for justice (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Nov 2024 OP
No peaceful means will stop these fascist criminals Charging Triceratops Nov 2024 #1
Garland isn't the only one to blame for justice denied DeeDeeNY Nov 2024 #2
Where in the Constitution? dpibel Nov 2024 #3

DeeDeeNY

(3,964 posts)
2. Garland isn't the only one to blame for justice denied
Mon Nov 25, 2024, 05:37 PM
Nov 2024

In November 2020, after Trump had already lost to Joe Biden, 12 Democratic Senators voted to confirm Trump's judicial pick of Aileen Cannon and 13 Democratic Senators didn't vote at all.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1162/vote_116_2_00228.htm

dpibel

(4,012 posts)
3. Where in the Constitution?
Mon Nov 25, 2024, 06:47 PM
Nov 2024

Mueller, She Wrote says, "Jack Smith and the DoJ are bound by the Constitution to dismiss the charges against Trump."

I could be behind on this, but what I read in Smith's motion is that the Office of Legal Counsel decided that the old OLC decision about charging a sitting president applied to this situation.

An OLC opinion may purport to be based on the Constitution, but the matter has never been litigated, never decided by the Supremes or any other level of federal court.

That hardly constitutes "bound by the Constitution."

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mueller, She Wrote: THREA...