General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBath Michigan 1927, worst school massacre
and he used explosives not guns. He was a man who wanted revenge and his way only. It seems his way of thinking is growing in America and fueling the violence.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103186662
TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)Sorry - No stomach for your lame NRA-like stuff just now.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)There was no claim made about justifying gun-nuttery, just a comment that the insanity is not new, but is growing.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)I am hoping people would start discussing what else is going on that is making these massacres more frequent.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I do think we need to ask WHY.
Because the thing that's utterly freaking me out about this is that the perp was the father of one of the kids in the class. Are we going to frisk every parent who goes to a school concert or play? How do you defend against something like this?
Gun control sounds okay at first glance, but changing the law won't take guns off the streets, nor can it protect school children against this type of a will to destroy your own child and the children of others. Little kids are so utterly defenseless.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)whether you like it or not.
I went to a 1-room country grade school, and I would bet that every kid in that school came from a home in which there were multiple firearms. I would further bet that every kid, of both sexes, and including the first-graders, had had some training with those guns. When we visited each other, we would often look at and handle our parents' guns, with their easily-obtained permission. Guns were viewed as dangerous tools, like axes, and we were taught to respect them and use them correctly. Nobody was afraid that one of us would bring a gun to school and start shooting.
I am not arguing that that world of 60+ years ago was anything like today's world, and I am not addressing what society should do about guns in the present. I'm pointing out that access to firearms is not commensurate with wanting to use them on other people, or to the level of violence in society. The world was different then, and people didn't resort to guns. I can recall one (double-) murder in the county in all my years of growing up. That happened when a guy who had been brutally abused by his parents in childhood came home AWOL from the Army and murdered both parents with a deer rifle.
Everyone was really freaked out by this incident, and it was talked about for years. Yet I do not recall anyone panicking over the access we kids had to guns.
In modern times, maybe we do need to limit firearms, and I become less resistant to the idea as time goes on.
However, gun control will not solve this problem. It won't even dent t. The problem will only be solved when we stop inculcating a culture of violence into ourselves and our children.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)humanity has been quite savage toward children for many, many years.
it's a horrible thing to happen. especially with innocent children.
thanks for interjection of balance.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)I don't belong to the NRA and I personally do not own any firearms. It is my choice. I also know people who own guns and it is their choice. We need to look at issues beyond just the weapon used because disturbed people will always find a weapon.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)You gave yourself away right there...disgusting.
NRaleighLiberal
(61,703 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)and not the mentality behind the weapon.
NRaleighLiberal
(61,703 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(61,703 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)oldhippie
(3,249 posts)nt
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)but people continue to ignore that fact.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)You found one. It's the extremist ideology of the NRA and it's enablers that must be dealt with right now.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)Response to lalalu (Original post)
datasuspect This message was self-deleted by its author.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)and closed mindedness fueling violence.
oldhippie
(3,249 posts)So many people let their emotions overcome their brains. No different than the shooters.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)People who are pissed off about repeated mass gun murders are "no different than the shooters"?
Maybe you should delete your stupid, thoughtless, and insulting post.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)since that is sooooo wonderful.
sP
oldhippie
(3,249 posts)So do you think being pissed off lets you do anything you want without consequences? Being pissed off excuses you from civility? Really?
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)FUCK THE MOTHERFUCKING NRA AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)Fuck the First Amendment (you said something I don't like, so you can't say it anymore)! Fuck the Fourth Amendment (Eh, strip searches for your weed are always a good idea)! Fuck the Fifth (If you're silent, you must be guilty), 14th (black people need to go back to the plantation), 19th (women belong in the kitchen, not the polling booth)...
You can't pick and choose. They're all there for a reason. Don't like it? Get it removed. Good luck with that, though...
Don't get me wrong. The NRA is a bunch of fucking assholes. That doesn't change the second amendment, though.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)colonila times...just like the third...the housing of soldiers...they were grouped together for a reason.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)The "right" to own slaves existed when it was written, too. That was also wrong. The 2nd amendment makes NO SENSE in a modern era. Fuck the second amendment.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)This is like claiming that because there was once a horrible, awful storm in 1865 there is no climate change.
No one's buying it any longer.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)increasing frequency and strength of storms. People who disagree with climate change say it is just the earth going through normal changes and have a simplistic view. People who believe in climate change know that we need to trace the underlying causes for the obviously increased and dramatic changes.
Saying it is just the gun causing these massacres is simplistic. There is more to it than the weapon used. There are underlying causes for the increased frequency of such massacres in this country and we need to look at them.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Because if there's anything the evidence has shown is that people who defend the reckless availability of machines for mass murder have thousands of specious arguments to debate what ought to be common sense.
We can't eliminate crazy, disgruntled, and murderous people. We can do something to keep mass killing machines out of their hands.
And any gun lover with a modicum of taste would shut the hell up for one day.
Good bye
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Seriously, I don't even own a gun. This just shows how narrow minded this country has become and the refusal to look outside the little box of ideology people choose.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Sorry if that bothers you. A bunch of dead kids bothers me.
ecstatic
(35,032 posts)right now, we need to address our gun problem, which is out of control. Thanks for your post.
DURHAM D
(32,990 posts)and delete this post?
lalalu
(1,663 posts)open your mind to look beyond simplistic reasons for growing violence in America.
Response to lalalu (Reply #22)
Post removed
DURHAM D
(32,990 posts)but this is not the time for these insensitive OPs.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Looking beyond easy answers to a growing problem of violent massacres is insensitive? It is not just guns behind the growing violence in America and we need to address those issues.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)At least your avatar is appropriate.
DURHAM D
(32,990 posts)Perhaps Skinner will deal with this as he has done with the OP.
Logical
(22,457 posts)At Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Bath Michigan 1927, worst school massacre
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021977962
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
This level of callousness does not belong at DU...posting an OP like this in light of such a tragedy.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:35 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This is relevent and on-topic. As many here have been saying, if we can't discuss this now, when? While I disagree with the commenters conclusion, it's a discussion worth having.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It is the truth! Stupid alert!
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)It was to start a discussion about a very serious and sad growing problem in America. This is upsetting and I am not sure what the answer is but we need to do some searching about what is going on.
Logical
(22,457 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)And he used bombs to do most of his killing.
Not sure what your point is.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)lapfog_1
(31,785 posts)If you allow the premise that summer camp is the equivalent of school, then the 80 people (mostly children) killed at the camp in Norway by a gunman is the worst "school" shooting / killing. (not including the 7 he killed by explosion in Oslo).
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Let's be honest in that what happened in Norway was more an anomaly. In America this is happening at a growing frequency.
The thing is we are that point where it only makes the news when there is a massacre. Yet there are growing instances of violence against children everyday and in many forms. The United States has one of the worst rates of murder and violence against children in the world.
lapfog_1
(31,785 posts)oldhippie
(3,249 posts)Have a link?
aquart
(69,014 posts)We have leash laws for dogs but what is stopping the men? Here, have a gun and kill as many people as you'd like. Kill as many women's children as you like.
Take guns away from men.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Before your OP, NOBODY on DU would ever have fathomed that killing children with explosives is even possible. Very important and timely to bring that up...
????????????????????
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)We have mass shootings every week now. Your gun-clutching "argument" is invalid.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)Not a thing.
uppityperson
(116,002 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)Thanks Skinner!
I don't usually do that, but for this one I will.
DURHAM D
(32,990 posts)old guy
(3,299 posts)My ignore list is way too long as it is.
neverforget
(9,512 posts)FUCK YEAH!!!!
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Thank you!
countryjake
(8,554 posts)Profile information
About lalalu
Statistics and Information
Account status: Posting privileges revoked
Member since: Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:45 PM
Number of posts: 1,663
Number of posts, last 90 days: 1663
Favorite forum: General Discussion, 904 posts in the last 90 days (54% of total posts)
Favorite group: Religion, 33 posts in the last 90 days (2% of total posts)
Last post: Fri Dec 14, 2012, 10:50 AM
Alerts
Alerts sent by me: coming soon
Successful alerts (post was hidden by Jury): coming soon
Success rate percentage: coming soon
Jury
Willing to serve on a DU Jury: Yes
Chance of serving on a Jury: 6% (explain)
Number of times served on a Jury: 3
And get a load of this Transparency Page:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=291272&sub=trans
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)until then your point is meaningless
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)That sums up my position.
Placing of explosions and making them takes a lot of time and planning.
hatrack
(64,540 posts)The mass murderer at Virginia Tech did not use explosives to kill his victims, and neither did the killer during the Oikos University attack in Oakland back in April of this year.
Klebold and Harris did use explosives during the Columbine massacre, but their victims, fatalities and wounded alike, were shot, not blown up.
Moving beyond schools to other mass murders in public spaces, 12 died and 58 were wounded earlier this year in Aurora by firearms, not explosives, though the tear gas grenades Holmes used could technically be called explosives, or at least pyrotechnics.
Similarly, the Seal Beach Massacre (eight dead) 12 October 2011, the Cupertino Quarry shooting (five dead) 5 October 2011, the Tucson shooting of Gabi Giffords and her constituents (six dead) 8 January 2011, the Northern Illinois University shooting (six dead) 14 February 2008, the Westroads Mall Shooting in Omaha (nine dead) 5 December 2007, the Cafe Racer shootings in Seattle (six dead) 30 May 2012 and the Sikh Temple shooting in Oak Creek, Wisconsin (six dead) 5 August 2012 were all mass murders in which guns rather than explosives were the weapon of choice for the perpetrators.
So what the FUCK is your FUCKING POINT?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)If only the teachers had had TNT...
Aw, screw it.
NRaleighLiberal
(61,703 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)You are REPREHENSIBLE!
