General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat DU thought in June
People might find it interesting. A pardon wasn't that popular back then.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219014397
Response to BlueCheeseAgain (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PJMcK
(24,537 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Crunchy Frog
(28,207 posts)Enjoy your stay.
Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)That's good, it's the first step toward healing.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)others for having views that they themselves had only recently?
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)The power of the pardon is given to the President to use in his official capacity for the betterment of the Nation.
How would pardoning an individual rightfully convicted of crimes do that?
I could see an argument that Hunter has not been "rightfully" convicted due to extreme bias on behalf of his proscutors, but if he actually did do the things he may be convicted of, and the sentencing is in line with standards, meaning no wrong would be corrected by the pardon, randomly pardoning criminals because it feels good would be an abuse of Biden's Presidential power.
As everyone should know, since the thread you reference the sentencing and persecution of Hunter has gone way, way beyond any standard penalty for the crimes he committed, and the reasonable expectation that Hunter would be even further abused by the incoming nazis if not pardoned, justifies my position that this pardon was the right thing to do to correct wrongs done by the nazis.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)But your larger point stands. You did put the caveat in.
I was taken aback that you described my other post as comprised of right wing talking points, though. It didn't seem that way to me.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)I presented four arguments in favor of the pardon and four against, and concluded I was ambivalent.
The four arguments against didn't say anything that was out of line in June. Why is that now considered right wing?
Response to Think. Again. (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Think. Again. (Reply #6)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_resistance_movement
And we here at DU happen to be lucky enough to have that paperclip symbol as a DU avatar choice!
Response to Think. Again. (Reply #28)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
Crunchy Frog
(28,207 posts)Dump becoming pres again alters the equation dramatically.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)... might change things. Most seemed pretty absolute about it.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...did you check to see if the people who wrote one thing in the June thread are the same who wrote somethng different in the recent thread?
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Just observing that being cautious about a pardon was once a mainstream view here and not held in contempt.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)And I believe the stance of this post is false because you are claiming people have changed their positions when they haven't.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)I said the idea was mainstream, in that it was acceptable and shared among many people.
Both supporting and opposing a pardon were mainstream ideas back then. Now, not as much.
Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandySF
(80,623 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)I've alerted the posts.
Celerity
(53,438 posts)Celerity
(53,438 posts)Emile
(40,113 posts)Response to Emile (Reply #15)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
Crunchy Frog
(28,207 posts)Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #26)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
Crunchy Frog
(28,207 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Prairie Gates
(7,047 posts)"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."