General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOlivia Troye's attorney has responded to Kash Patel's demand for a retraction
Mark Zaid is a first class attorney and Binnall is a hack who has filed a couple of lawsuits for trump. I love the concept of using a picture from Monty Python to respond to Patel's demand for a retraction
Link to tweet


flying rabbit
(4,997 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)edbermac
(16,489 posts)
DoBW
(3,331 posts)Punx
(476 posts)Just the right amount of disrespect.
Roy Rolling
(7,712 posts)Not even respecting the demand with a serious reply. Well done, barrister, well done.
GoCubsGo
(35,006 posts)I blow my nose at you...
Skittles
(172,906 posts)don't just say no, MAKE FUN OF THEM
endless summer
(55 posts)is a thing of beauty and it will be a joy forever.
sheshe2
(98,470 posts)I
love the Monty Pythons image.
GB_RN
(3,589 posts)Someone better have some aloe-coated toilet paper, because his ass just got burned! Hell, I can feel the heat from here!😂
What a bunch of incompetent morans (sic). Personally, even if you spotted them a tear in it, I wouldnt trust any of them to find their way out of a wet paper bag.
EarnestPutz
(2,843 posts)Ocelot II
(131,252 posts)Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
Very truly yours, and farting in your general direction,
Mark S. Zaid
CousinIT
(12,763 posts)EastBayGuy
(163 posts)orangecrush
(31,182 posts)rsdsharp
(12,094 posts)sign them Best wishes for the holiday season.
COL Mustard
(8,395 posts)"Fuck you. Strong letter to follow."
I used to get that regularly from him.
Biophilic
(6,685 posts)Best laugh Ive had today. Damn that is just a perfect response. Thank you, thank you.
LisaM
(29,688 posts)Oh well, the recipient will likely not notice that.
rubbersole
(11,277 posts)"Kashyap" sounds like a venereal disease.
BattleRow
(2,716 posts)magicarpet
(19,422 posts)Like the one djt splats on the ceilings and walls at the White House when he gets real angry about something.
The Tangerine Traitor's standard ketchup tantrum.
spanone
(142,064 posts)Mr. Evil
(3,472 posts)that is the proverbial grand slam, down by 3 runs, with two out and the bases loaded in the bottom of the ninth inning.
Drum
(10,770 posts)ultralite001
(2,685 posts)"I fart in your general direction"...
🤣🤣🤣
NoMoreRepugs
(12,234 posts)Figarosmom
(13,427 posts)bikes and bunnies
(99 posts)First class attorneys should proof read- or pay someone to proof read for them.
Otherwise, good letter.
billh58
(6,655 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Do you think you are being supportive of the lawyer or the DU member?
Response to Emrys (Reply #36)
Bernardo de La Paz This message was self-deleted by its author.
TomSlick
(13,093 posts)I always proof read, and have my assistant proof read, everything that goes out of the office over my signature. Even so, errors are sometimes missed. Every now and then, someone will point out the error and I apologize profusely if insincerely.
LisaM
(29,688 posts)I am a paralegal, I see attorneys make mistakes like this all the time and it's kind of annoying.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,605 posts)https://shakespeare-navigators.ewu.edu/TN_Navigator/Twelfth_Night_Act_2_Scene_3.html
Hekate
(100,133 posts)JoseBalow
(9,742 posts)HUAJIAO
(2,730 posts)Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)... love to Olivia and Mark!
Wounded Bear
(64,654 posts)brer cat
(27,688 posts)proud patriot
(102,572 posts)Emrys
(9,205 posts)His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issue of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory.
We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter. Mr Arkell's first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.
The reply that the Eye sent back was:
We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell.
We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off.
A libel writ with a "curt note" arrived by return of post. The legal process continued for more than a year before the case fell apart and Private Eye was awarded costs. The Eye wrote "In view of the above, Mr Arkell has now, albeit belatedly, complied with the suggestion made to him at an earlier stage in the proceedings."
https://prunescape.fandom.com/wiki/The_Reply_Given_in_Arkell_v_Pressdram_(1971)
GoneOffShore
(18,035 posts)Dem2theMax
(11,005 posts)Instant classic!
Now excuse me, while I go fart,
in honor of this masterpiece.
MustLoveBeagles
(17,314 posts)yellow dahlia
(6,495 posts)spudspud
(671 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(182,138 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(137,506 posts)And he knows it.
marcopolo63
(99 posts)on top of a most delicious John Cleese raspberry. Fruit tree firmly planted and thriving!
3auld6phart
(1,683 posts)::
With Bases loaded. In the words of us ordinary pee- on s go pound sand.
gay texan
(3,253 posts)you empty-headed legal type animal food-trough wiper!!!"
Erda
(232 posts)Proud Cajun
(3 posts)I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,138 posts)This response by Troye's attorney made me laugh
Link to tweet
https://www.rawstory.com/kash-patel-2670350304/
In a legal letter on Friday, Mark Zaid sneered at demands Kash Patel made for Olivia Troye, a former counterterrorism aide to Mike Pence, to publicly retract defamatory statements of the MAGA loyalist. Zaid answered Patels lawyer Jesse Binnall, a veteran Trump attorney, by first noting that Troyes statements have been previously stated by a wide swath of the knowledgeable population.
He then offered Patels attorney a visual image in his letter to reiterate his stance.
But to answer your specific question as to Ms. Troyes intensions as to a retraction, I think Monty Python expresses it best, Zaid wrote above a photo of a mustached character from the Monty Python film known as the French Taunter.
My counsel @markzaidesq.bsky.socials response to #KashPatel & his threat to sue me for being critical of him on media & stating he is unfit to serve as FBI Director, Troye wrote on social media. Monty Python enters the chat.
And Zaid wasnt done. He also launched a social media blitz where he dug into his unwavering defense of his client and referred to Patel as thin-skinned.
Evolve Dammit
(21,818 posts)mackdaddy
(1,991 posts)Things are so bizzaro world, I get confused.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.