WSJ isn't serious anymore

[struggle4progress]

Mona Charen and Sam Stein discuss the WSJ blaming Joe Biden for mistrust in the government without once naming Donald Trump ...

[kimbutgar]

1. I stopped reading it when Murdoch brought it

And no longer consider it a reliable source of news.

[choie]

2. Mona Charen?

Blech.

[struggle4progress]

3. Yes -- but the world of opposition to Trump &c may be complicated

[Blue_Tires]

4. When was the WSJ serious? And why is anyone surprised?

Remember back during the summer when Biden got those American hostages freed from Russia, including a WSJ reporter? The WSJ went to surprising lengths to avoid even mentioning Biden or showing him a single iota of gratitude (as far as they're concerned, all the credit should have gone to the State Department, which in their world has zero connection to the White House)... I think one of the top editors FINALLY gave Biden a little bit of credit more than a week later, and that's only because everyone on Twitter was calling his ass out.

[struggle4progress]

5. Their editorial policy has always sucked. But there was once a time when their reporting

was respectable and reliable

[Blue_Tires]

6. I wasn't even talking about editorial

But when the top person on the masthead has a hundred tweets thanking everyone BUT Biden, I got a huge fucking problem