Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stardust Mirror

(685 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:55 AM Dec 2024

Since it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes..

isn't there some sort of evidence trail that could be used to prosecute him for government-by-bribe?

I mean it's not like he knows anything about the government agencies he's appointing people to head, or the countries he's giving ambassadorships to. Someone has to be screening all the requests to submit bids/bribes to get positions they want. I don't believe anyone on the Drumpf team is researching who is best qualified for any of these positions but I would venture there is a team screening/soliciting bribe bids.

OK those are my crazy thoughts. I'm ready to be corrected and informed.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes.. (Original Post) Stardust Mirror Dec 2024 OP
The Roberts Court/SCOTUS says bribes are cool and fine and good. RockRaven Dec 2024 #1
Supreme Court gave him immunity and they think bribes are wonderful. Irish_Dem Dec 2024 #2
Yes it is pay for play right now. Trump is making good money selling positions in his administration. Irish_Dem Dec 2024 #3

RockRaven

(18,965 posts)
1. The Roberts Court/SCOTUS says bribes are cool and fine and good.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:06 AM
Dec 2024

Especially when given to Republicans, but also in the general case.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Since it's fair to assume...