Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 03:46 PM Jan 2025

Want to watch Sugar Bowl today? Will cost you $60.99

I'm not a big football fan, but did want to watch today's Sugar Bowl in the aftermath of the New Orleans tragedy.

But to sign up with ESPN to watch, will have to pay $60.99 for one month.

Screw that. What a ripoff. No doubt republicon "morals" and "values" are behind this royal screwjob to Americans.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Want to watch Sugar Bowl today? Will cost you $60.99 (Original Post) BoRaGard Jan 2025 OP
Stadium tickets DeepWinter Jan 2025 #1
Billionaires can afford this stuff BoRaGard Jan 2025 #7
I wanted to go to the Rams Super Bowl. Initech Jan 2025 #26
I believe this is the end result of Losing the Supreme Court battle.... JohnnyRingo Jan 2025 #2
Yup. G.O.P.-style business BoRaGard Jan 2025 #4
Net neutrality stances don't dictate what cable television network channels can do. Celerity Jan 2025 #8
I'm assuming this is related to getting ESPN online rather than cable EdmondDantes_ Jan 2025 #16
I did not see them talking about online streaming/internet. They were talking about cable channels. Celerity Jan 2025 #25
Cable is dying. JohnnyRingo Jan 2025 #28
For most of us cable subscribers, Faux Noise isn't "optional" FakeNoose Jan 2025 #18
I have over the air. It's a hassle trying to tune in some stations but I'm glad I'm not paying every month and nothing scipan Jan 2025 #24
Yeah, this time of year just isn't the same without being able to watch the bowl games. LudwigPastorius Jan 2025 #3
OK, I Agree, But When Is a Fan to Get the Proper R&R, Given the Explosion of Bowls and CFP and NFL, The Roux Comes First Jan 2025 #17
Lots of kids will never become fans BoRaGard Jan 2025 #19
Games are also on too late for kids, even on non school nights pstokely Jan 2025 #23
Should be on down at the local watering hole for the price of a pop! tritsofme Jan 2025 #5
I hear ya! But a lot of sports bars will show the game, so there's that FakeNoose Jan 2025 #6
ESPN Is Basic Service Here, Too ProfessorGAC Jan 2025 #12
Hulu and YouTubeTV both have free trials. I canceled YouTubeTV when notified of the upcoming price increase. Floyd R. Turbo Jan 2025 #9
If you're cool pirating live feeds - Sportsurge provides a ton of links Brother Buzz Jan 2025 #10
If you are a College Football fan you probably already have ESPN Jose Garcia Jan 2025 #11
In other news, things cost money. BannonsLiver Jan 2025 #13
You don't already get espn? I got a cheap Emile Jan 2025 #14
Sling TV is only $45.99 videohead5 Jan 2025 #15
We have inadvertently buckled to the entertainment cachukis Jan 2025 #20
NYT says Fubo. sinkingfeeling Jan 2025 #21
Good thing I have zero interesting in watching. City Lights Jan 2025 #22
The people that pay for this nonsense are the same ones Klarkashton Jan 2025 #27
 

DeepWinter

(931 posts)
1. Stadium tickets
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 03:54 PM
Jan 2025

same deal. Priced themselves outside normal people taking thier family.

I rmember my Dad taking me to watch the Cubs at Wrigley Field in the 1970's. Was $1.50 for a bleacher seat. Those days are long gone.

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
7. Billionaires can afford this stuff
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:06 PM
Jan 2025

not us honest working stiffs.

Guess I will head out for a walk on the beach,
let the gridirons fall where they may.

Initech

(108,782 posts)
26. I wanted to go to the Rams Super Bowl.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 11:59 PM
Jan 2025

The cost of nosebleeds was $1500 minimum. I shit you not. Totally disgusting.

JohnnyRingo

(20,870 posts)
2. I believe this is the end result of Losing the Supreme Court battle....
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:00 PM
Jan 2025

...with Net Neutrality.

We were warned that everything would go ala carte. Want NASCAR? get the motorsports channel. Like football? You can buy a monthly subscription of NFL and MLB for all the games coast to coast. Fox or MSNBC? That's on the news channel with CSPAN.

Back when Net Neutrality was shot down the telemarketers rejoiced, with one CEO in particular stating that "It'll work out fine if no one gets greedy".
I'll never forget that line.

EdmondDantes_

(1,797 posts)
16. I'm assuming this is related to getting ESPN online rather than cable
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:45 PM
Jan 2025

But it's also still not the result of net neutrality. It's that they know people will pay for sports.

Celerity

(54,407 posts)
25. I did not see them talking about online streaming/internet. They were talking about cable channels.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 11:57 PM
Jan 2025

Before this reply of mine, your mention of 'online' is the only one in the thread, the wording 'streaming' did not appear at all, and the word 'internet' only appears in a reply after after mine.


FakeNoose

(41,631 posts)
18. For most of us cable subscribers, Faux Noise isn't "optional"
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 05:02 PM
Jan 2025

We don't pay extra for Faux, and we can't cancel it either. Well I supposed we can, but it's a big hassle. It really bothers me that part of my monthly Verizon payment supports Faux Noise!

When people say they're "cutting the cord" it means they've completely dumped cable TV altogether. The old familiar cable box goes away, and from then on, it's all internet channels and subscriptions. I haven't done that, so my channels are selected by Verizon.

My son and daughter-in-law cut their (Warner) cable in New York City a few years ago. They now get a lot of free channels from the internet and I think they pay for a subscription to Netflix only. It's definitely cheaper for them.

scipan

(3,041 posts)
24. I have over the air. It's a hassle trying to tune in some stations but I'm glad I'm not paying every month and nothing
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 11:34 PM
Jan 2025

to show for it.

LudwigPastorius

(14,724 posts)
3. Yeah, this time of year just isn't the same without being able to watch the bowl games.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:02 PM
Jan 2025

I guess the Over The Air networks just couldn't compete with the kind of money ESPN was throwing around.

The Roux Comes First

(2,278 posts)
17. OK, I Agree, But When Is a Fan to Get the Proper R&R, Given the Explosion of Bowls and CFP and NFL,
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:52 PM
Jan 2025

Not to mention the burgeoning of college basketball, female and male!?

I need a nap!

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
19. Lots of kids will never become fans
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 05:03 PM
Jan 2025

because they've seen so few games -- unless they are Billionaire Brats (R)

pstokely

(10,891 posts)
23. Games are also on too late for kids, even on non school nights
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 11:29 PM
Jan 2025

And they last too long for anyone with short attention spans

FakeNoose

(41,631 posts)
6. I hear ya! But a lot of sports bars will show the game, so there's that
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:06 PM
Jan 2025

Luckily my regular Verizon Fios carries ESPN for no extra charge. But I wouldn't pony up for it either, if I didn't already get it. I pay them enough each month. Don't get me wrong, I love watching Notre Dame football games! But I have limits, and that's one of them.

ProfessorGAC

(76,700 posts)
12. ESPN Is Basic Service Here, Too
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:31 PM
Jan 2025

Not sure that ESPN2 or ESPNews is, though. That might be an enhanced tier.
We get a much of different sports channels. Probably 12.
But, we're in a very high tier for movies & other premium stuff.
I've never itemized to see how much everything beyond ESPN costs.

Floyd R. Turbo

(32,913 posts)
9. Hulu and YouTubeTV both have free trials. I canceled YouTubeTV when notified of the upcoming price increase.
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:19 PM
Jan 2025

Brother Buzz

(39,898 posts)
10. If you're cool pirating live feeds - Sportsurge provides a ton of links
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:23 PM
Jan 2025

It’s a little glitchey until you sort it out and repeatedly close the insipid popup ads. Once it settles down I stream a signal better than over the air broadcast.

Emile

(42,289 posts)
14. You don't already get espn? I got a cheap
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:38 PM
Jan 2025

Directv plan and I get it, along with Big Ten Network.

videohead5

(2,950 posts)
15. Sling TV is only $45.99
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 04:38 PM
Jan 2025

For the package with ESPN in it and some offer a trial for a week or more.

cachukis

(3,934 posts)
20. We have inadvertently buckled to the entertainment
Thu Jan 2, 2025, 05:05 PM
Jan 2025

industry.
Cancelled many of my subscriptions and now if I want to read have to resubscribe.
Use ROKU and Sling without much live stuff.
We once had free television and news. We had the adverts and complained, but it was all free.
Newspaper subscription was cheap and we read the newspaper.
Capitalism thrives filling voids. Cable TV brought us sports, MTV, and a thousand channels. Our common viewing shrank and our connections to each other did as well.
We've searched for connections and so many have flocked to authoritarian guidance.
The Church had serious control until Martin Luther.
The Second Ecumenical Council ended RC dominance.
Now our connection to each other is money.
Pretty sad.

Klarkashton

(5,292 posts)
27. The people that pay for this nonsense are the same ones
Fri Jan 3, 2025, 12:01 AM
Jan 2025

Howling about the price of eggs.

Fuck the whole thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Want to watch Sugar Bowl ...