General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeta gets rid of fact checkers and makes other major changes to moderation policies
Meta gets rid of fact checkers and makes other major changes to moderation policies
By Clare Duffy, CNN
3 minute read
Updated 7:34 AM EST, Tue January 7, 2025
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/meta-censorship-moderation/index.html
"SNIP..............
Meta will be making major changes to its content moderation policy on Facebook and Instagram, getting rid of fact checkers and replacing them with user-generated community notes, similar to Elon Musks X, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday.
Metas newly appointed Chief of Global Affairs Joel Kaplan told Fox on Tuesday that Metas partnerships with third-party fact checkers were well intentioned at the outset but theres just been too much political bias in what they choose to fact check and how.
The announcement comes amid a broader apparent ideological shift to the right within Metas top ranks, and as Zuckerberg seeks to improve his relationship with Trump before the president-elect takes office later this month. Just one day earlier, Meta announced Trump ally and UFC CEO Dana White would join its board, along with two other new directors. Meta has also said it will donate $1 million to Trumps inaugural fund, and that Zuckerberg wants to take an active role in tech policy discussions.
Kaplan, a prominent Republican who was elevated to the companys top policy job last week, acknowledged that the Tuesday announcement is directly related to the changing administration.
................SNIP"
bucolic_frolic
(55,818 posts)It's a giant CON game.
SheltieLover
(81,715 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,589 posts)SheltieLover
(81,715 posts)SheltieLover
(81,715 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)I'm talking even here.
Thanks all.
Hugin
(37,993 posts)Bezos, Cook, Zuckerberg, et al lost a bet.
That wager was Trump would lose in 2024. True, a suckers bet with Pootie and President Musk handling the count.
One part of it was the $1,000,000 to The Diaper Barons Inauguration Fund. Which of course, is only a humiliating means to launder it directly into his pocket.
There were undoubtedly other concessions
I can easily imagine that losing a bet to Trump would mean that he feels entitled to own you forevermore. Sort of like, SATAN.
newdeal2
(5,606 posts)They have more money to lose than us personally. They are doing whatever they can to avoid getting into his crosshairs.
underpants
(197,179 posts)U2 Sunday Bloody Sunday 1983
LeftinOH
(5,673 posts)..and getting called out their nonsense is the "bias" they complain about. Among my Facebook "friends," the ones who complain the most about fact-checking are usually the biggest purveyors of utter bullshit: "proof of Kamala Harris wearing a microphone disguised as an earring during the Presidential debate; photoshopped images of Obama dressed as a Blank Panther, etc, etc.. It's exhausting.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.