General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAxios reporting that an Exec Order signed to revamp FEMA
The order calls for the creation of a task force, dubbed the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council, to review FEMA and recommend changes in a report to Trump.
The group will be composed of the secretaries of homeland security and defense, along with private-sector subject matter experts, per the order.
Between the lines: The task force could recommend getting rid of the agency.
I'd point out (from experience):
--No FEMA head has yet been named;
--Tornado season typically begins around April.
-- There's usually at least 10 or more disaster recoveries in progress at all times, nationally. California is an especially complex response/recovery.
This administration essentially will be building an airplane while it's in flight. What could go wrong?
jls4561
(3,115 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,480 posts)screwdrivers into the spokes of government.
One of many things he may not realize is that FEMA doesn't just respond to the 50 states and Puerto Rico, but also to Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Marianna Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia.
surfered
(13,465 posts)Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Phoenix61
(18,828 posts)assistance to cities is reimbursement for things they have paid for. If FEMA decides what was paid isnt a qualified expense the city is on the hook for the bill. Theres no way to prequalify a lot of the expenses.
allegorical oracle
(6,480 posts)homeowners. Insurance covers some of the public infrastructure, but the qualification of uninsured public losses is always a lengthy wrangle during recovery.
Basically, the municipality receives only reimbursement for what the disaster wrecked -- roads, bridges, schools, libraries. If a public structure was already in disrepair, it likely won't be totally reimbursed. If it's a critical road or bridge, it stands a good chance of getting repair assistance. The Small Business Administration provides low interest loans to small businesses and individual homeowners. Costs are split between state and federal funding -- usually on a 25/75 basis. Huge disasters like Katrina and now California often end up in a 10/90 share or even a 100 percent federal coverage.
Is the agency as good as it good be? No. But the improvements inevitably are attempted between storms, simply because there's so many disasters that are being worked at any given time. The full time FEMA staff is only a few thousand people and is augmented by several hundred "reservists" who respond when needed.
RainCaster
(13,717 posts)Trump has never improved anything. All he knows is destruction. When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
msongs
(73,754 posts)IbogaProject
(5,913 posts)To better allow for grift, corruption and discrimination.
vapor2
(4,509 posts)I say he can't take it with him
yellow dahlia
(5,877 posts)Puppy Killer and a Torturer of Women
Plus - the mindset behind the mission of the military is completely different than the mindset behind the mission FEMA. But the grifter would not understand any of that. He does not live on that level of understanding.
Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)It's typical corporate BS. The consultants will tell them what they already know, and their recommendations will have no impact on the outcome. It's just an excuse to make it look like they did their due diligence.
allegorical oracle
(6,480 posts)private consulting companies popped up everywhere. Full time FEMA folks were leaving the gov't. like crazy to become consultants.
It was (I felt) a rip-off. Here's why: after a disaster the feds arrive and assess damages. Meetings begin with the town or city and state as to reimbursements. Negotiations reach agreements. Once private consulting companies entered the picture, their personnel would be hired by the town or city to make their assessment. Those were extremely costly. Negotiations would begin and funding decisions were reached.
Then FEMA would pay what it agreed PLUS the cost of the private consultants' assessment fee. So the taxpayers' bill rose considerably. One consultant I knew made enough money following a couple of disasters to purchase matching new Jaguars for himself and his wife. I hope that policy may have changed, but....
That is why I fear DJT's FEMA "do-over" may result in the privatization of the agency because disasters will become even more "grift bait" than they could be now.
Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)They will claim that that the studied it and privitization was the recommendation.
UTUSN
(77,795 posts)Tanuki
(16,448 posts)which must abide by uniform rules and regulations, and instead distribute or withhold it by executive privilege on the basis of political patronage.
ReRe
(12,189 posts)Chaos. Chaos. Chaos. Chaos. Chaos. Chaos. Chaos.
oldmanlynn
(821 posts)At some point, hes gonna make a serious mistake. Thats gonna really hurt people in their pocketbooks and other ways and that will start opening up some eyes. then I think the Maga movement and Trump will come tumbling down in a glorious self destruction