General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPittBlue
(4,807 posts)I dont care, do you? I want to see her stand ins portrait.
Tickle
(4,131 posts)on the outside. It's the inside I have an issue with
mr715
(3,647 posts)She's wearing that jacket to keep the chill in.
lastlib
(28,347 posts)un -edited

Cha
(319,341 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,601 posts)she's not laying out on a rug.
Irish_Dem
(81,601 posts)And she is not turning tricks. At least not that we know of.
Irish_Dem
(81,601 posts)Melania is wearing a power suit in an office setting.
She uses clothing to send messages.
What is she telling us?
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,943 posts)As boring as she is. She who will not play an active role unless well-paid.
Irish_Dem
(81,601 posts)3catwoman3
(29,493 posts)...photo shoot. Remember all the poutrage when Michelle Obama posed with bare arms? But nobody seemed bothered by Melania's bare ass.
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,943 posts)what she looked like before she discovered expensive designer clothes.
Tommy Carcetti
(44,519 posts)Or heavily airbrushed
LeftInTX
(34,485 posts)Speaking of botox, Ivanka looked heavily botoxed last week. Maybe Melania over did it and that's why she's been covering her forehead with hats.
LeftInTX
(34,485 posts)Norrrm
(5,175 posts)Skittles
(171,976 posts)and the only job she has is gold digger
ultralite001
(2,570 posts)Wasn't this the official portrait last time around???

The new portrait is simply corporate cosplay...
malaise
(296,562 posts)Huh?
allegorical oracle
(6,498 posts)at home with the cheese face. Maybe owns a whip and a cat mask.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)mr715
(3,647 posts)electric_blue68
(26,935 posts)GoCubsGo
(34,938 posts)What's with the squinting? What a miserable looking woman.
3catwoman3
(29,493 posts)Jit423
(1,568 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(16,655 posts)Retrograde
(11,427 posts)er, paid - to show up in DC last time is now posing with the Washington Monument in the background? Like she's the one in charge now?
I noticed that she's been more visible lately. Sort of - at the Inauguration and during her visit to Los Angeles she had a hat pulled over her eyes as if the sunlight hurts them.
oldtime dfl_er
(7,177 posts)Super heavily photoshopped. Almost looks like her head was superimposed on someone else's body. Something is off, on the angle of her head and neck.
I call Power Penis Projections
piss poor penis projection.
We have a winner! You WIN!
spanone
(141,740 posts)Meowmee
(9,212 posts)bif
(27,039 posts)Kid Berwyn
(24,569 posts)She lied. She should be gone.
Anchor baby, too.
My Take on the AP Story on Melanias Illegal Work in the US
Siskind Susser Immigration Lawyers
(c) 2001
Excerpt...
First, did Melania really begin work on an H-1B visa in October 1996? Thats the date that was offered by the Trumps. But theyve never documented this so we only have their word. Of course, they insisted there was no illegal work so why we should trust them on the start date for an H-1B or even if she ever had an H-1B?
Second, Michael Wildes said Melania got an H-1B visa on October 18th at the Slovenian consulate. Its not clear why she didnt file to change to an H-1B status in the US instead of going to a consulate. She may have actually been smart to leave the US to get the H-1B visa because her next entry on an H-1B visa would have been legal. That would at least avoided lying on a change of status application. However, it is very possible that Melanias illegal work would have come up in her consular application. So visa fraud is still a question mark.
Third, October 18th is a strange start date for the H-1B. The H-1B cap did not run out for the fiscal year that ended September 30, 1996. In fact, only 48,000 H-1Bs were used that year. https://www.visalaw.com/state-department-visa-numbers-for-october-1996 This means Melania COULD have gotten an H-1B visa for the dates in question, but for some reason she and her employer chose not to.
Fourth, we still have no idea how Melania converted to permanent residency. Michael Wildes said in 2000 she filed for a green card in the EB-1 category. No evidence of this has ever been produced and Wildes had earlier indicated Melania got the green card through an earlier marriage. This is still a mystery. But Melania would have been required to list her work history for the prior five years so if she failed to list the illegal work, she potentially engaged in visa fraud and USCIS could reopen both her green card and her subsequent citizenship application and potentially reverse. And this, in theory, would make Mrs. Trump potentially at risk of being deported. Keep in mind that if Melania had a decent lawyer, he or she might have counseled her to disclose the illegal work because under Section 245K of the Immigration and Nationality Act, she would still have been eligible for the green card. Its the lie that is the problem, not the illegal work. Of course, this is all assuming that the information provided by the Trumps and Michael Wildes is true.
Continues...
https://www.visalaw.com/my-take-on-the-ap-story-on-melanias-illegal-work-in-the-us/
Be best.