General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you want DU to grow?
Or at least not die?
Stop.
Insulting.
Young People.
Take all the time you need with that,
but it shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
LearnedHand
(5,594 posts)I'm not under any illusions that young people would flock to Get Off My Lawn Underground, but it's embarrassing and insulting not to recognize the next generation of progressives and show them some respect.
poli-junkie
(1,595 posts)because they are more nimble on social media. Time to ask them for our help.
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Nixie
(18,105 posts)voted for Al Gore, but he didnt win 25 years ago. Now those young people are in their 40s or 50s. Older people are stopping them. How laughably clueless.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Perhaps you haven't read some of the vitriol towards young voters here on DU.
Nixie
(18,105 posts)weeks ago. One poster called TikTok users fucking idiots,. It was a very stupid thing to say about 145 million users of any social media, especially young people.
I guess I see the broad brushing of old people and find that just as short sighted. We all age as elections come and go. The 20-year-olds who voted for Clinton are now going into their 30s, and Im sure you would agree those young people would have been better off with Clinton than Trump.
Attacking Republicans rather than Democrats is what I see old people saying. The republicans have obviously played the long game. They vote for absolute idiot scum just to retain power. Surely Gore would have been better than Bush.
We all have to understand how the electorate is voting and learn our lessons going forward, young and old.
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)And it doesn't help when 46% of young voters voted for Trump.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...against young voters here on DU certainly isn't making them feel very welcome to the Democratic Party.
yardwork
(69,642 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)yardwork
(69,642 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...tried to get them to hang on but youth doesn't put up with much garbage these days.
yardwork
(69,642 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)mahina
(20,708 posts)want DU to grow and know the young people are necessary and brilliant.
Doesn't mean I throw the older people under the bus, if they have a track record of standing up for us and have the commitment. Bernie is old. We're lucky he is there.
Anyway I'm open to learning and support your encouragement for young folks! 'd add to that, insulting the people we are working to persuade to understand it's not young v old, right v. left, progressive v. whatever you can call former conservatives (burn it downers?) It's the people v the billionaires and the oligarchs.
my .02
aloha
iemanja
(57,780 posts)NoonTimeRag
(35 posts)That the party is completely going down in flames now? Something has to change quickly or it's going to be gone.
There's a guy named asmongold on youtube and he has a huge young following. Gen-Z is getting lost.
iemanja
(57,780 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2025, 01:41 AM - Edit history (1)
but perhaps overstated.
You edited your post after I responded. I don't know who asmagold is, but I don't think views of random people on social media is the way to choose a president.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Called for Palestinians to be genocided, attacks women gamers. Really nice role model for the Democratic Party.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)
He calls himself a professional neckbeard. Let me check with Gen Zer that I know......
And there is a coup in the Democratic party because of this guy????
Is not showering the future of America?
Link to tweet
NoonTimeRag
(35 posts)LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)He would stink too much!
This video has 759 K viewers! So what??
This one has 92.5 million viewers..LOL
&ab_channel=RandomChannel
Maybe people just like to watch weird.
And what does it say about the WORLD when this is the most watched video in history of youtube. 15 billion views!
&ab_channel=BabyShark-PinkfongKids%E2%80%99Songs%26Stories
intheflow
(30,249 posts)Oh, those unwashed young people! Those damn dirty hippies! Hey, you kids! Get off my lawn!
Yeah, what goes around comes around.
And also: what does it say that Baby Shark is the most watched video? I dunno, that its a catchy tune that literally millions of children across the world love? If you want to see the cultural impact of Baby Shark, watch this video of protesters in Lebanon singing Baby Shark to a child who was scared of the protests. Maybe Baby Sharks high views are a sign that people love our children so much well play an annoying song over and over again just because it brings them joy.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)Love the confirmation basis. You think he's good because he bashes Democrats and doesn't shower?? Is everyone who bashes Democrats good? Is that what DU is coming to?



intheflow
(30,249 posts)Colored me surprised.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)but definitely has some fires to put out
JustAnotherGen
(38,109 posts)I've been a registered Democratic since 1991.
Let me clear this up - That's Gen X. . . not a Boomer.
On that note - in my opinion - Boomers were and are the GOAT - The Greatest Generation. I stand on the shoulders of Black Americans and Women who came before me.
Back on topic - If it is going 'down in flames' I question the source (not you poster) of that comment. I've been alive long enough to remember the constant shrill harping of the media that "The Dems are in Disarray".
What I DO think needs to happen - is the purity tests need to stop now.
I don't believe in a Universal income for everyone.
Another person might believe Tariffs will stick it to the man (I'm on the opposite side of that).
Can we both agree that Voting Rights are Critical? If so - we aren't in disarray. We aren't going down in flames.
Right now - me? I'm so sick and tired of the media and everyone else continuing to call the MagaPublicans Republicans. The Republican party is dead.
But the MagaPublicans always come home to their 'daddy'.
Just my two cents. I'm starting to see the IRL activism pick up amongst Genz and Millenials where it SHOULD be. That doesn't look like anything is being burned up in flames to me.
samplegirl
(14,124 posts)Has pushed so many people away with snark!
Not just young people.
Some people hat have to be mean!
LudwigPastorius
(15,001 posts)(That's a question, not an insult.)
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)their experience is partly what inspired the OP
Jack Valentino
(5,250 posts)We are dinosaurs here.... The original version of this software was created before 9-11,
back when I was still fresh to 'America Online'...
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)should those who do show up here be unwelcome?
and tell their friends how awful it is here?
JI7
(93,900 posts)even if people told them how great it was and everyone was nice.
Becsuse there is so much more out there for young people.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)"People here are always claiming to know what young people want."
Celerity
(54,866 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 4, 2025, 11:11 AM - Edit history (1)
As of November/December 2024, Reddit is the 6th or 9th most-visited website in the world (depending on which ranking site you use).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-visited_websites

Tree Lady
(13,384 posts)for people on the left.
I don't do politics there but see stuff while I am there.
missingm
(89 posts)We could use discussion on change in the Party. Doesn't have to be unmanaged or destructive, bit recommending one Dem vs another (obviously not the Russian plant) should be ok.
B.See
(8,856 posts)The Way Forward
iemanja
(57,780 posts)The Way Forward. https://democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1324
JI7
(93,900 posts)becsuse they are at a time in their life where they have so many other interests.
People here are always claiming to know what young people want.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)I'm 51. I have friends ranging from seven years old to eighty-three, but most my friends are younger than me. When a bunch of them were wondering about alternatives to the increasingly shitty modern social medium platforms, I was hesitant to direct any of them here because of the ageism toward young people I see so much
JI7
(93,900 posts)are not for them.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)lol
Celerity
(54,866 posts)nor specificity.
If I were to say the same things about Boomers, I would be flayed alive here. Instead, some of those Gen-Z kickabout replies have had double-digit recs.
The same broad-brush slating/youth-bashing has been going on here in regards to Millennials as well, since I joined DU (and I am sure before that).
DeepWinter
(931 posts)DU is very liberal/progressive and a pretty broad brush is also applied to fellow Democrats that are very moderate/establishment.
electric_blue68
(27,296 posts)Now, I don't remember specifics.
In relationship to another post of (I think) yours, I think I responded sympathetically to Student Loans difficulties. Probably because my then college ('70-'74) had for a very long time a scholarship for each student. I didn't have the difficulties many do have bc of that. I think they changed it, but have the goal of returning to it.
H2O Man
(79,250 posts)Now just a gal-darned minute! When I was younger -- so much younger than today -- the youth were known for adopting each and every single value and delusion of their elders. And we were mighty glad to do so. When the young, brash heavyweight champion Muhammad Ali said, "I don't have to be who you want me to be," we knew he was wrong. Darn him. Or when that guy John Lennon and his group "The Bay City Rollers" sang, "All You Need is Love," we debated burning records, but burned weed instead, in non-violent protest. We copied our parents music, hair styles, and dress. We loved when President Nixon conducted the baptisms of Abbie Hoffman, Grace Slick, Jim Morrison, and Janis Joplin in Pat Boone's swimming pool. I note that more people watched that than the moon landing.
These fucking kids could learn a lot from our experiences.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)malaise
(297,926 posts)Rec
Response to The Wandering Harper (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
iemanja
(57,780 posts)and thereby making it irrelevant. They are not speaking of themself.
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)Has active membership or star membership declined over the years? Has it increased?
iemanja
(57,780 posts)I don't know about active or star memberships, but with an increasingly demographic, it's inevitable. I happen to think a diversity of ideas and experiences is a good thing.
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)DU, as far as I can tell, is just as vibrant today as it was when I joined in 2008.
I'm just guessing but I also think the majority of active people here joined after I did.
Edit: I just looked at your profile to see when you joined and I see that you used to go be BainsBane!
iemanja
(57,780 posts)in threads bashing the younger generation. I've also seen polls where people disclose their ages, and there are few DUers under 50. It's also a very white site.
Yes, I used to be BainsBane. I changed my name when Skinner/EarlG offered the option because I didn't want to be tethered to an old election. I now go by the Brazilian goddess of the sea. Feb 2 is the day they celebrate her, BTW.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)It's more "vibrant" to them. I think it's a personal preference.
I'm old and I don't like Tik Tok videos because I really don't like watching things with loud background music. I don't like Facebook stories either. (Same issue) It's a personal preference for me.
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)Celerity
(54,866 posts)Kaleva
(40,431 posts)What percentage of younger DUers have left here because of the atmosphere?
Has DU membership declined in the past few years? If so, by how much?
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)it should be an issue for all of us.
That's solidarity, and we need a lot more of it to get through this
Celerity
(54,866 posts)are you on polls' as well. Multiple ones had hundreds of responses, and myself and a random, gardly posting account or two were often the only ones under 25yo (now I am 28) and even up into the 35yo or even 40yo and unders there were usually a small handful at most.
As I have posted often before, I tried for years to get so many I know in my real life social set (a global one, including many Americans) and afe cohort (18 to 34) to join DU, and almost everyone (including many who actually did check it out) told me 'thanks but no thanks'.
Many of them mentioned the far too often seen open hostility by too many here when it came to subjects involving us younger folk (student loan threads were notorious for that).
This is definitely a far older (than the average US age in general) board in terms of it's demographics, and it is ageing, on balance, more each year.
I see few actually new (new as in not alt accounts of already existing DU posters) posters who come in and contribute on a regular basis and who stick around for at least a year and who do not eventually get tossed (directly or otherwise).
I have always been quite good at pattern recognition and other analytical endeavours, and despite not having hard data from the owners if the site, I absolutely do not believe this board has any truly significant level of active participation from the 35yo and under age cohort, and has not for ages (if ever).
All one needs to do to see easily observed manifestations of the above is to look at hhe staggering amount of 50s, 60s, and 70s cultural references that saturate the board on a daily basis. Compare that to a profound lack of younger Millennial and Gen Z cultural idioms (not to mention waves of self-admitted lack of knowledge about our cultural inputs, outputs, and social structures, etc).
I also (to a lesser degree of certainty, but still substantial in my confidence about it) do not see this board as being in much of a state of actual net-on-net growth, in terms of legitimately 'new' posters.
You can see this openly reflected in the amount of posts and replies at present compared to amounts for both from previous times. I often use DU Search and it is amazing how many '300, 400, or more replies' OP threads that were churned out here a decade (and/or longer) ago, compared to DU now.
electric_blue68
(27,296 posts)the previous swath of time you mention.
I've only been here since June ? '23.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)When I had my house remodeled, I rarely posted. I was kinda stuck in a room with a phone. I gravitated more to SM.
NoonTimeRag
(35 posts)I see either people over 25k posts and 10 years on here and almost nobody new. Is that normal? All over this site it seems that way.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)It's very hard to share images on DU. Certain images can't even be shared here. You need to screenshot and then upload them to an image sharing site. It's tedious. Also, if I'm working on a post, it "doesn't save". There is no draft for it or anything. The site itself is pretty much in the early 2000's.
Also, have you ever tried posting on DU with a smartphone??? It's a night mare. DU doesn't even have a spell checker on my phone. It's extremely tedious and no fun! Young people are on their phones all the time and they are going to gravitate to platforms which are smartphone friendly.
electric_blue68
(27,296 posts)smartphone.
I've had very little problems. Its true having to use a image hosting site; It's extra steps.However if you do it often enough it becomes semi-automatic, easier to go through it.
It's like learning to, say, go on line and search in the first place.
I remember the first year late 1995 (afer going to a pretty rare back then - Net Café in The East Village), or so using the Library's computers for on line activity vs searching their database for books. Over time I could set up faster, and faster which meant I had more time to actually do stuff.
It takes some patience to become fast using various tools. 👍
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)There is no way for me to know their ages but DU gets new members all the time.
Sometimes I go back to read old threads from 10 or more years ago and I see familiar names that are no longer here for whatever reason. Do there is turnover.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)H2O Man
(79,250 posts)you think it is about the person's experience?
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)FDRFTW
(100 posts)Tree Lady
(13,384 posts)I volunteered on his campaign years ago.
Skittles
(172,852 posts)certainly not me!!!
I keep saying the older Dem politicians need to pass the baton already, I think too many of them are very much OUT OF TOUCH.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)iemanja
(57,780 posts)in which the whole thing is dedicated to insulting Gen Z. These appear regularly.
Skittles
(172,852 posts)no generation takes kindly to being trashed as a group, and for good reason
Response to The Wandering Harper (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
KS Toronado
(23,866 posts)
NoonTimeRag
(35 posts)Is the same. It's impossible to use without being banned or mass blocked without explanation. It's terrible.
Skittles
(172,852 posts)Violet_Crumble
(36,417 posts)Dumbfucks. Cry me a river of tears.
Response to Violet_Crumble (Reply #55)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Violet_Crumble
(36,417 posts)radical noodle
(10,689 posts)And making more enemies every day.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)rubbersole
(11,277 posts)progree
(13,076 posts)in the wake of the bitter 2016 primaries battles (Hillary v. Bernie).
But they had a similar problem -- maintaining and enforcing a part of the ideological spectrum.
When they were done lionizing Bernie, they started boosting Tulsi Gabbard
I see their domain name is up for sale for $4,911 . No idea why they would think it's worth that.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Whenever I've tried to mention that the blanket-bashing of the younger vote won't help build our voter ranks (which I did before and during the campaign), I was swarmed by multiple "old-timers" (or just one using multiple names?) who tried baiting and stalking to shut me down.
I've seen more than one 'new, young' voice here be harrassed out the door, never to return.
So Thank You for posting this.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)You set this in the right frame: If DU is to grow, then respect for all ages is what is needed, but especially for younger folk.
New young members can stay for a long time. Those of us who joined twenty years ago were twenty years younger then but some forget. Old members tend to stop posting when they die. Younger members have less tendency to die and they do have great ability to learn and grow.
IcyPeas
(25,781 posts)We could be sharing info there. DU has more news stories here than you would ever see on tv news. It's such an informative site. The more the merrier (as long as they're not weirdos).
I don't know how many younger folk have signed up on BlueSky.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)many of them have recently signed up on bluesky
I considered suggesting they check DU, but . . .
Walleye
(45,414 posts)Insults are the lowest form of conversation. Result of intellectual laziness and immaturity. No insults would be the best course. I think its getting so thats all you read on social media anymore.
malaise
(297,926 posts)Rec
SADAR
(77 posts)Perhaps stop doing the Repubs job of "divide and conquer" for them?
Perhaps stop piling on when someone is perceived as "wrong"?
Perhaps stop deciding that if one is in the "wrong" state that they don't matter?
elocs
(24,486 posts)marble falls
(72,531 posts)The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)A phrase going around when boomers were young?
Shouldn't boomers be the mature ones?
ProfessorGAC
(77,271 posts)First, it's not both-siderism. Not sure you know what that term means.
Secondly, if you didn't want pushback, perhaps a condescending, lecturing OP wasn't the right approach.
Third, using the term "childish" is awfully close to a violation of TOS.
It doesn't appear you considered the ramifications of your post.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)and you're probably right about my use of childish,
I can get as reactive as anyone.
But I've posted enough here to expect pushback.
marble falls
(72,531 posts)... we old fucks have a lot in common with you young'uns, like war, poverty, why REITs have 11 millions of housing units held back to keep prices and rents artificially high, why crisis investors speculate on headlines to raise profits to the detriment of ALL OF US.
marble falls
(72,531 posts)... "Don't trust anyonr over 30" was coined in 68 (two years before Gen X and three years before Elon Musk) by a leader of the Free Speech Movement in Berkley - Jack Weinberg in '68 when he was 28 years old. A shame, in two years he'd never be able to trust himself again. It was an effort to do two things: an effort to over 30s to start trusting we under 30s ( I was 17 in 68 and I was continually told to keep my place and shut up), and to just down the "Generational Gap", (and we all are more tribal regarding our generation than ever).
When reporters pointed out to either Jerry Ruben or Abbie Hoffman was told he was a year or two over 30, he replied, "Don't trust anyone over 40!"
Trump is no boomer. But we boomers trusted a lot of politicians and leaders over 30, some of us were co-opted - just like Xers, Millenials (Gen Y), and Gen Z. Like Gen Alpha and Gen Beta will, too.
This "boomer" crap is offensive and has no goal past libeling others. That's the difference a lot of these younger folk do not get. We were saving the world. And they are just interested in their own personal comfort.
See what I did there? I just gave the 'boomer treatment' to a lot of people that are as open and caring as a lot of boomers are.
We boomers have a lot of common drives, goals, values with the following gens, especially with Gen X and Y. I have great faith in them to fix the system and not rag anyone else on their side. I wish I could be here for time AOC's gen gets a chance at the wheel.
demmiblue
(39,941 posts)Not gonna lie, if I were part of that demographic, I probably wouldn't post here!
I would gladly trade my ignore list for some younger folks. We need their perspective, even if it means butting heads every now and then.
betsuni
(29,290 posts)have no idea what's going on and so on. Why would Young People be driven off DU, weeping and insulted?
I don't believe that for a second, how condescending! The polarizing Age Wars are stupid. It won't work.
Kilgore
(1,819 posts)The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)a handful of members under 50 responded
but dozens over 50
iemanja
(57,780 posts)Kilgore
(1,819 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,907 posts)to do regular Tik Tok videos highlighting this Discussion Board. Most top social media creators are on multiple platforms.
D.U. needs to become a content creator itself, beyong aggregating information. It IS more than an aggregator, but it is very good at that--and at sharing little known stories.
DU has its own personality, and that can be promoted on various platforms. Start clicking on some TikTok videos, folks. It's worth sifting through the bad shit to get to the good, because the good is really good - - and DU could add to that and to a larger audience and still maintain and grow this board.
SalviaBlue
(3,110 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2025, 01:46 PM - Edit history (1)
This is because of the wisdom and life experience of the posters and their ability to express this wisdom with the written word. This format isnt for everyone and I am okay that it trends to attract an older demographic.
LuvLoogie
(8,907 posts)And in a video on TikTok, one could express that. Sample script:
"Hi. We're from The Democratic Underground, a community of old school forums in the written word. We have a community of great writers and posters in various styles with a wide variety of interests and experience. We would like to interact with some of our younger kindred. Check us out and lurk a bit,. Engage if you like...
etc.
Not only that but start commenting and engaging with other TikTok'rs' content as D.U.
D.U. needs to be present and engaged as an entity. Across platforms.
questionseverything
(11,966 posts)The ads cover everything and as soon as you clear one , more pop up, so I dont know how it could ever attract new members
. I wouldnt pay for a membership to a place I couldnt try for free
///////
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)but I didn't have that issue when I was starless
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)A bunch of get off my lawn and old man yelling at clouds vibes here.
travelingthrulife
(5,572 posts)Get over yourself. You guys are the ones who need to rise up and fight back. We did it during our generation too, and we received generational insults as well, but it is YOUR future being decimated here.
Hitorque
(254 posts)The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)Hitorque
(254 posts)They wouldn't be useful idiots and Trumpers.
I've stopped trying to talk reason to irrational people -- No longer worth my time, energy or mental health... But you be my guest and keep trying to talk to them. 🤨
yardwork
(69,642 posts)All the young people I know in RL are not interested in DU. They are not going to participate here. They think we're a bunch of geezers - and, basically, with a few exceptions, that's accurate.
DU was founded in January, 2001. I joined in 2004, when I was middle aged. Do the math and most of us are at or near retirement age.
Lots of us have millennial and Gen Z children and family, and most of what's posted here about them is fairly accurate.
If you don't like it, leave.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)This is my 3rd incarnation here. I joined in 2001 when I was 28.
Don't tell me what to do
Response to The Wandering Harper (Reply #102)
Name removed Message auto-removed
betsuni
(29,290 posts)and trying to murder DU dead. They're totally not getting any attention in the Age Wars.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)what can I say, one of my three best friends turned seven on Sunday
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)I won't.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)believe it or not, there are some young people who know what's up
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)You made no distinction between young Magahat and young progressives
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)Kaleva
(40,431 posts)I'll continue to tell those who did to get lost and fuck themselves.
Response to Kaleva (Reply #125)
Post removed
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)You can't fix stupid.
The Wandering Harper
(915 posts)and welcome you to my ignore collection
Kaleva
(40,431 posts)LizBeth
(11,222 posts)out there.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)I cringe every time I see a young person bashing post.
Boomers and GenX both had a majority vote for Trump.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.