General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking: "Rubio announces he's acting director of USAID"
Rubio announces hes acting director of USAID as Musk and Trump work to dismantle agencyCNN
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Monday that he is acting administrator the US Agency for International Development after Elon Musk, the worlds richest man charged with overhauling the federal government, said President Donald Trump had signed off on shutting the agency down.
In Washington, USAIDs headquarters was closed for the day, with employees told in an email to remain at home.
Logos and photos of its aid work have been stripped from building walls. And its website and social media accounts have gone dark, replaced with a reduced version of its webpage on the State Departments website.
It is the apocalypse at USAID, one USAID official said.
More at: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/03/politics/usaid-washington-workers/index.html
bronxiteforever
(11,212 posts)delegation of power to Musk by appointing confirmed cabinet officials after the Musk fait accompli.
True Blue American
(18,579 posts)Rubio is pretty level headed.
gab13by13
(32,507 posts)His first act was to freeze military aid to Ukraine. Rubio is a pump handle, just like the rest of them.
UTUSN
(77,795 posts)stillcool
(34,407 posts)Solly Mack
(97,067 posts)Trump's transactional America, everything, everywhere, all at once.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)keep_left
(3,213 posts)...about shutting down various agencies and programs that have existed for time immemorial. He can't possibly have the intelligence to make these plans, or even the curiosity to know that these things exist. I wonder if this is one of those instances where Trump is plagiarizing various insanities from Fox "News" or the WSJ editorial page. Or maybe this is coming from alt-right websites or something. But I just can't see Trump being the least bit interested in the workings of agencies like USAID, etc.
obamanut2012
(29,436 posts)GoodRaisin
(10,971 posts)Past presidents who attempted to not spend the appropriations have lost in the Supreme Court.
newdeal2
(5,505 posts)A stooge that tasks orders from President Musk
MineralMan
(151,430 posts)It's a developing story. I posted it minutes after the CNN story broke. I do not comment on breaking news stories.
Tommy Carcetti
(44,566 posts)And Trump will nominate Darren Beattie (the current State Department Undersecretary for Public Affairs who is a white nationalist and Russia sympathizer) as his replacement.
And the Senate Republicans will roll over and confirm Beattie.
valleyrogue
(2,760 posts)It is on life support now.
thinkingagain
(1,352 posts)From what I can remember / understand
Basically he and his family fled/left Cuba and stayed away because of a dictator
Now he is helping put one in our country in part for his personal gain
MineralMan
(151,430 posts)My post is just information. I do not endorse anyone at all in this matter. Something happened. I posted it. That is all.
thinkingagain
(1,352 posts)I was just sharing my thoughts on him
Passages
(4,290 posts)Meanwhile:
The rules of the Senate are designed to protect the rights of the minority, and Democrats have tools at their disposal to grind Senate business to a halt if Republicans try to ram through Trumps extremist agenda. The three biggest weapons? Blanket opposition, quorum calls, and blocking unanimous consentparliamentary guerrilla tactics that can slow, stall, and obstruct at every turn.
Schumer is not entirely wrong to believe that Democrats need to pick their battles. My normal preference would be to focus on economic fights, which will emerge quickly enough as Trumps tariff wars drive up inflation. But Musks coup is an economic matter as well an attack on the Constitution. Having the worlds richest man gain privileged access to government data, which he will then unilaterally use to slash spending, is the very embodiment of oligarchy. By making Musks coup a fighting issue, Democrats have a chance to appeal to the distrust of centralized power and wealth that spans the political spectrum. Polling shows the public is increasingly souring on Musk, who has a net approval rating of minus 16 percent (36 percent favorable, 52 percent unfavorable). Its unlikely that very many Americans want Musk to have their personal information.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/elon-musk-spending-data-coup/
MineralMan
(151,430 posts)He represents the very worst of what Trump is trying to do. Should be the #1 target.
Passages
(4,290 posts)And, he never shuts up about his agenda, no wonder his approval is so low.