Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wicked Blue

(8,868 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 02:56 PM Feb 2025

I just watched the Congressional Democrats' news conference on USAID

Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:48 PM - Edit history (4)

C-SPAN cut them off as they began trying to enter the USAID building.

UPDATE: The Democrats were blocked from entering the USAID building according to BBC.


Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) led the group of members of Congress and USAID employee to the doors.

One hell of a lot of great speeches.

The gist was that they would not allow an unelected oligarch like Musk to unconstitutionally shut down USAID or other federal agencies.

Only Congress has the power to do that, the speakers said, vowing to stop what they called an illegal action.

BBC has live updates on the Democrats' remarks at https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cy08dkgej8pt

BBC: Democratic lawmakers call aid shutdown illegal
published at 13:54

We've just heard from a number of Democratic Party lawmakers. Here's a recap of some of the main points from the press conference:

Democrats pushed back at Trump's attempts to shutter the US government's main international aid department, calling the moves illegal
They also took aim at Elon Musk who appears to be leading the charge - one lawmaker called him an "unelected billionaire oligarch"
The Democrats have emphasised the agency's life-saving aid work but have also raised national security concerns and geopolitics - noting that money from USAID goes to guarding Islamic State prisoners, and that US rivals are celebrating the turmoil
The lawmakers contend that the shutdown of the agency is against the law and that changes can only be made after debate in Congress

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just watched the Congressional Democrats' news conference on USAID (Original Post) Wicked Blue Feb 2025 OP
No coverage on MSNBC senseandsensibility Feb 2025 #1
Nor on CNN live stream Wicked Blue Feb 2025 #7
Annoying but typical newdeal2 Feb 2025 #10
Pissed off at MsNBC hannah Feb 2025 #11
Lets get the Hitlerian SOB out of our country or even better, off our planet! justhanginon Feb 2025 #23
Y'all, remember.. the media is not our friend. ananda Feb 2025 #21
Yeah this isn't the 1972 or even 70s media Dem4life1234 Feb 2025 #51
MSNBC better start covering these matters, and damned soon. Paladin Feb 2025 #25
I'm astonished that any single DU member is a regular viewer of any of the big three including MSNBC msfiddlestix Feb 2025 #31
Yes. Be Leave On Feb 2025 #37
What about Rachel? Felicita Feb 2025 #41
And Lawrence. Really i think Joy, Chris, Jen, too. electric_blue68 Feb 2025 #43
And Ali Velshi for sure. yorkster Feb 2025 #53
Rachael's great, so is Nicole Wallace, and Laurence O'Donnell and others, msfiddlestix Feb 2025 #54
God hannah Feb 2025 #26
This new streaming network is fantastic. gypsy11 Feb 2025 #42
I love Ben! Dem4life1234 Feb 2025 #52
a TV stations that SUPPORTS AMERICA Skittles Feb 2025 #45
This is why the for-profit model can't be depended on for news misanthrope Feb 2025 #27
I saw something when I turned on MSNBC at least an hour ago. Clicked off when hubby walked in Hekate Feb 2025 #30
what does USAID do? -Administrator Samantha Power on "America's Ground Game: How USAID is Changing and Why It Matters" mahina Feb 2025 #33
I was watching, and disappointed that CSpan cut away as they were entering. yellow dahlia Feb 2025 #2
Saw it too. Representative Jim McGovern said bronxiteforever Feb 2025 #3
It looked to me like they all got in the building. gab13by13 Feb 2025 #4
Excellent that my Senator VanHollen was there! elleng Feb 2025 #5
Coverage of Dem actions... 2naSalit Feb 2025 #6
Why were they cut off orangecrush Feb 2025 #8
Joe Katz on Bluesky said they were allowed in? Alice B. Feb 2025 #13
Thanks orangecrush Feb 2025 #15
k&r bigtree Feb 2025 #9
It's not really clear DeepWinter Feb 2025 #12
Here is the law that created it (funding for it was also included in an Appropriations bill for 1962) BumRushDaShow Feb 2025 #34
Congressional Research Service report on the topic (from yesterday) FBaggins Feb 2025 #48
I had posted some info earlier this morning on the creation history (and modification) of this BumRushDaShow Feb 2025 #49
Video at link orangecrush Feb 2025 #14
Here malaise Feb 2025 #16
HA HA orangecrush Feb 2025 #18
Was looking when you posted malaise Feb 2025 #20
Watching on You Tube it is a link from PBS so not sure if we are getting all of it yellowdogintexas Feb 2025 #17
KICK FOR EXPOSURE orangecrush Feb 2025 #19
K&R defacto7 Feb 2025 #22
They were blocked, according to ABC6 chia Feb 2025 #24
I just want to know JustAnotherGen Feb 2025 #28
Thank You For This Post Rendville Feb 2025 #29
So, only Elon musk's Hitler youth... dchill Feb 2025 #32
EXCELLENT !!! I'm sorry there wasn't much coverage live, but this is what we have to do. Bluetus Feb 2025 #35
Yea!! Beck23 Feb 2025 #36
Isn't it time for someone to make a citizen's arrest of Musk? Or get our military to overthrow this regime? Jit423 Feb 2025 #38
"Blocked" by whom? malthaussen Feb 2025 #39
The fucking M$M is an integral part of this hostile takeover Blue Owl Feb 2025 #40
Actually, there are a lot of posts about it on reddit. Yup, reddit is spreading the word more than mucifer Feb 2025 #44
It wouldn't hurt JDAcme Feb 2025 #46
😱 Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2025 #47
Well I'm happy LPBBEAR Feb 2025 #50

Wicked Blue

(8,868 posts)
7. Nor on CNN live stream
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:03 PM
Feb 2025

There could be members of Congress being turned away by Musk's goons or even being arrested for all we know, but there's no coverage.

newdeal2

(5,417 posts)
10. Annoying but typical
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:05 PM
Feb 2025

But don’t be discouraged. Share this online so it goes viral on other platforms. The evening news and others will be forced to cover it.

Have another protest tomorrow and the day after etc. more and more media will show up to see the spectacle.

hannah

(414 posts)
11. Pissed off at MsNBC
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:06 PM
Feb 2025

That have the rat bastard on droning on and on. With freaking Rupert Murdoch sitting next to him.
Get Elon musk out of our Government Now!

ananda

(35,152 posts)
21. Y'all, remember.. the media is not our friend.
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:39 PM
Feb 2025

But it's good to see Dems finally taking some action.

 

Paladin

(32,354 posts)
25. MSNBC better start covering these matters, and damned soon.
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:17 PM
Feb 2025

I'm not returning as a regular viewer if they fail to do so.

msfiddlestix

(8,178 posts)
31. I'm astonished that any single DU member is a regular viewer of any of the big three including MSNBC
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:30 PM
Feb 2025

The Owners of Every. Single. One. of these cable news networks are IN BED with Musk, Trump, Et Al and have been for years, earlier to a lesser degree but the past year or so, they're all in.
It's been as obvious as the nose on my face, I don't understand how it has been ignored, passed over, dismissed by any of ccommon sense and intelligent DU members.
I just don't understand it.
There is only one answer to this issue and that is to completely cut the cord from their cable and streaming propaganda services.

End of Rant.

Felicita

(78 posts)
41. What about Rachel?
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 09:52 PM
Feb 2025

She seems to be resisting and getting out as much of the truth as possible. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I quit cable, but watch her online on msnbc sometimes.

electric_blue68

(26,856 posts)
43. And Lawrence. Really i think Joy, Chris, Jen, too.
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 10:06 PM
Feb 2025

Last edited Tue Feb 4, 2025, 03:27 PM - Edit history (1)

The ones I consistency listen to.

Probably Ali, too?

msfiddlestix

(8,178 posts)
54. Rachael's great, so is Nicole Wallace, and Laurence O'Donnell and others,
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 05:41 PM
Feb 2025

however, they are diamonds in a pool of sewage, produced and paid for by TSF and friends of the enemy of democracy, and for that reason I make a personal choice to deprive their profiting from me from clicks and views.

hannah

(414 posts)
26. God
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:17 PM
Feb 2025

Could we please get a tv station that supports Democrats.it’s really important not to have to rely on Republican Comcast. Most msnbc are former Republican operatives.

misanthrope

(9,495 posts)
27. This is why the for-profit model can't be depended on for news
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:17 PM
Feb 2025

Market forces steer them into lowest common denominator and sensationalism to drive profits.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
30. I saw something when I turned on MSNBC at least an hour ago. Clicked off when hubby walked in
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:25 PM
Feb 2025

I saw something when I turned on MSNBC at least an hour ago. Clicked off when hubby walked in

He’s not hostile — he just can’t take it any more. I’ll be watching Nicolle (also MSNBC) at 1:00 i.e. 45 minutes from now. I expect she’ll have more info.

Even the reliable news stations can’t be running only one trump-created crisis 24/7 — there’s just too much too fast being fire-hosed at us, which is by trump’s design.

Pick who it is you want to watch — in my case Nicolle Wallace. I have a little tv in the kitchen that I click on while I’m working in there to see if there’s anything happening with someone intelligent reporting, and click off if, for instance, it’s just Andrea Mitchell yakking. I don’t conclude that “there’s no coverage on MSNBC” based on that short interval.




mahina

(20,645 posts)
33. what does USAID do? -Administrator Samantha Power on "America's Ground Game: How USAID is Changing and Why It Matters"
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 05:19 PM
Feb 2025

Andrea Mitchell of all people has a seat on their council. She sat with Samantha Power after her 20 minute summary of how USAID takes on poverty, hunger, illiteracy, disease and conflict around the world. Great bits on the US and Russia, which makes sense out of why trump would be interested in rooting out this agency if he is working on behalf of Russia.

bronxiteforever

(11,212 posts)
3. Saw it too. Representative Jim McGovern said
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 02:59 PM
Feb 2025

“I apologize to the USAID workers who have to put up with this offensive bullshit”.

Now that is good fighting.

 

DeepWinter

(931 posts)
12. It's not really clear
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:09 PM
Feb 2025

USAID is an Independant Agency that has oversight from the State Dept, but is not an intergrated part of it.(wasn't) It's funding only exists as long as congress chooses to fund it. (Roughly $50 billion/year) There is zero obligation to fund it.

As of today Marco RUbio has said it's not disbanded, but merged into the Stae Dept. So there may be some shell and pea game going on. We'll see how the next week, month play out. We're going on a lot of hearsay right now. Let the facts come out.

BumRushDaShow

(169,761 posts)
34. Here is the law that created it (funding for it was also included in an Appropriations bill for 1962)
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 05:24 PM
Feb 2025
S. 1983 (87th): An Act to promote the foreign policy, security, and general welfare of the United States by assisting peoples of the world in their efforts toward economic and social development and internal and external security,...... and for other purposes.

It has been amended multiple times since and haven't had chance to go down the rabbithole for the details of it and the amendments.

ONLY CONGRESS can create, eliminate, or move agencies around.

You might recall when FEMA was at one time, an independent agency, but was placed under DHS just before Katrina hit and we saw the mess with that. But CONGRESS did that through H.R.5005 - Homeland Security Act of 2002 , NOT Tom Ridge (who became DHS Secretary at the time of the creation of DHS).

yellowdogintexas

(23,694 posts)
17. Watching on You Tube it is a link from PBS so not sure if we are getting all of it
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 03:28 PM
Feb 2025

They are all on fire. Loving it.

JustAnotherGen

(38,054 posts)
28. I just want to know
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 04:22 PM
Feb 2025

If they were able to get inside our building. Not Musks. Not the Felon's. The peoples'.

Bluetus

(2,799 posts)
35. EXCELLENT !!! I'm sorry there wasn't much coverage live, but this is what we have to do.
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 05:37 PM
Feb 2025

And there will be secondary reporting of this showing. Moreover, that gives Dems opportunities to practice the speeches and sharpen their points.

Keep hammering. This will break through, especially the point that ELECTED officials who actually have AUTHORITY over these agencies are being locked out, while an unelected jackass is inside burning the place to the ground.

Jit423

(1,568 posts)
38. Isn't it time for someone to make a citizen's arrest of Musk? Or get our military to overthrow this regime?
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 07:56 PM
Feb 2025

malthaussen

(18,572 posts)
39. "Blocked" by whom?
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 08:20 PM
Feb 2025

Whoever is doing it is carrying out an unlawful order and should be held responsible.

-- Mal

Blue Owl

(59,107 posts)
40. The fucking M$M is an integral part of this hostile takeover
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 08:20 PM
Feb 2025

They are there to tamp the opposition and help fat Donny fail upwards at all costs.

Fuck ABCNNBCBS and the billionaire fuckers they are serving

mucifer

(25,667 posts)
44. Actually, there are a lot of posts about it on reddit. Yup, reddit is spreading the word more than
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 11:37 PM
Feb 2025

the major news outlets.

JDAcme

(35 posts)
46. It wouldn't hurt
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 02:22 AM
Feb 2025

to always mention that USAID is a legacy of the Kennedy administration. Regardless of how odious the electorate seems these days, I believe there is still a reservoir of affection for JFK. The tie to Kennedy also establishes how long the program has been in place. It’s almost a tug on our heartstrings to recall a better time.

LPBBEAR

(658 posts)
50. Well I'm happy
Tue Feb 4, 2025, 02:18 PM
Feb 2025

to see the Democrats taking some action, any action, there are much bigger fish to fry here than USAID. By choosing to go after this issue rather than the much bigger issues of the illegality of Musk running around like a madman destroying the functioning of our government they're missing the more important domestic issues. With the Democrats spending their energies on USAID they've given the Repukes the chance to publicly point at the Democrats and say something along the lines of "See, all the Democrats care about is aid to foreigners".

I agree this is an issue but keep your eye on the ball Democrats. Focus on the bigger legal domestic issues Trump and Musk are involved in. There's PLENTY there to fight about and they are issues more important to the average American citizen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just watched the Congre...