Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
208 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lots of blame for the Mother. Apparently Dad's off the hook , though, (Original Post) elehhhhna Dec 2012 OP
Well, your statement there doesn't sound quite fair...... Joe the Revelator Dec 2012 #1
Whatever is the truth, she looks very human, like us Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #207
From what I read, she initiated the divorce. Laurian Dec 2012 #2
I wish someone would "abandon" me to the tune of $250K per year jberryhill Dec 2012 #23
!!!! sounds good to me too Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #204
From what I read, she initiated the divorce after he was caught cheating krawhitham Dec 2012 #68
Oops, sorry. I hadn't heard the cheating part. Laurian Dec 2012 #76
Right, Dad is never responsible for anything in these scenarios Warpy Dec 2012 #3
well, personally I'm going with what the people who knew her have said TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #32
Thank you for this Saboburns Dec 2012 #38
As-Salamu Alayka grantcart Dec 2012 #142
It's anger Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #146
So true. The survival, primitive part of the human brain does this WCLinolVir Dec 2012 #179
That's an interesting way to look at it Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #196
This is why the President said "today is not the day ..." Bake Dec 2012 #190
Exactly Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #195
You know why people do this... Kalidurga Dec 2012 #40
stop reading my mind TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #51
It's all about Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #147
That makes a lot of sense. Chemisse Dec 2012 #156
it's been tough here the last few days. Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #198
Not on DU it isn't TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #178
I was with you all the way through this thread Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #197
Really? renie408 Dec 2012 #200
Exactly..... sendero Dec 2012 #140
his mother told the male bbsitter to never leave Adam in a room by himself. grasswire Dec 2012 #46
and it seems to mean that as a youth TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #69
Autism or Aspberger's do not cause one not to feel physical pain. Depression can make one feel numb Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #134
I wasn't talking about Autism or Asperger's TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #141
Did not know he had congenital analgesia..... haven't seen that mentioned anywhere. Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #191
I agree - the babysitter left out that tidbit - or the reporter did. Chemisse Dec 2012 #157
We have no proof this was ever said obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #173
Excellent points. JohnnyLib2 Dec 2012 #53
Finally... OneMoreDemocrat Dec 2012 #54
Your Username is perfect with this post. I thank you for your drop of reason in this sea of madness KittyWampus Dec 2012 #56
Juvenile records are sealed by law... Sedona Dec 2012 #60
well he certainly showed no violent tendencies TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #81
Exactly, thank you for making my point. Sedona Dec 2012 #89
so back we go to that common sense thing TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #100
So we should assume he did? Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #149
Let's not assume he didn't = Let's assume he did. Chemisse Dec 2012 #159
The mother used horrible judgment in keeping a lot of guns around a mentally disturbed son. Arugula Latte Dec 2012 #61
what sort of mental disturbance? TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #94
His brother sure seemed to know. Bet Dad knew, too, and was helpless to change things. Nay Dec 2012 #110
And what has Ryan actually SAID? TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #137
Why are you spinning a tale? How about stick to the facts that we have. nt Chemisse Dec 2012 #161
Because he/she is a Nay-sayer (look at the username). MiddleFingerMom Dec 2012 #164
Actually, it's because I have a very long name that my baby brother could not say, and "Nay" Nay Dec 2012 #202
His brother has said no such thing obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #174
Here's what Ryan Lanza said, as reported in the UK Daily Mail.... Nay Dec 2012 #199
I add my Thank You also. Sissyk Dec 2012 #71
I also want to thank you Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #108
Very well said Riftaxe Dec 2012 #125
He did have an "altercation" with four office staff at the school. Sounds serious to Flabbergasted Dec 2012 #127
No he didn't TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #133
I haven't had time to read the threads you refer to but I thinkyou are correct. There is only one grantcart Dec 2012 #143
Thank you for this Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #145
Thank you! I am so sick of the 'holier than thou s' Chemisse Dec 2012 #155
Very well stated. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #160
Why did she need assault weapons? louis c Dec 2012 #169
thank you -- this obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #172
Why weren't the guns locked up? brush Dec 2012 #175
FWIW the "survivalist" part is not just DU yellowcanine Dec 2012 #176
There's a ton of articles saying this - her sister was the one who reported this. Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #194
this picture Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #205
They were married for 28 years BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #4
She initiated the divorce. ananda Dec 2012 #5
Well, we don't know everything. But the mom kept the firearms, right? NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #6
details, shmeetails. joeunderdog Dec 2012 #27
The devil is in the details, which some don't arthritisR_US Dec 2012 #44
Even that is not clear ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #124
The guns belonged to the mother. And they were some pretty scary guns. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #7
I read in several places that she initiated the divorce mentalsolstice Dec 2012 #8
This was exactly my take on it, too. He was already giving her more alimony than was required, Nay Dec 2012 #12
most of which is entirely speculative on your part HiPointDem Dec 2012 #117
All of this is speculative at this point ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #123
Of course it is. I am not a reporter writing a story, or an author writing a book. I am just Nay Dec 2012 #201
In one article I read, the older brother Ryan had not had contact with his younger amandabeech Dec 2012 #129
Yes, that book was chilling and this tragedy reminds me of it as well. n/t Inspired Dec 2012 #33
There is far too much we don't, and may never, know about their family dynamic Siwsan Dec 2012 #9
Does anyone know if the father shared in the love of guns? Hoyt Dec 2012 #10
he was a gun owner as well. reports were the "entire family" used to go to shooting range together bettyellen Dec 2012 #14
Thanks. Exactly what I thought -- kid was brought up in gun culture. Hoyt Dec 2012 #21
yeah, I think they are being a bit unfair to the mom for sticking it out. parents have few options bettyellen Dec 2012 #30
Mom was in bed in her pajamas No Vested Interest Dec 2012 #128
I hope she never knew. Chemisse Dec 2012 #163
Mom kept guns in the house kiva Dec 2012 #11
And that's really where the rubber meets the road Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #45
The landscaper who knew the mother said that she had a lot of bad things to say undeterred Dec 2012 #13
i know he was very generous with alimony, but he was also a gun enthusiast bettyellen Dec 2012 #17
Personally, I blame the son more than either the mother or father. egduj Dec 2012 #15
Color me kooky as well Saboburns Dec 2012 #41
I must be kooky also Sissyk Dec 2012 #77
We are all a product of our childhoods to some degree... cynatnite Dec 2012 #16
Started "a new one" with another woman, I presume. Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #18
You certainly do... regnaD kciN Dec 2012 #130
Well, he could have married a man. Odds are, though...nc Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #180
What the ever loving fuck are you talking about. Seriously. Marinedem Dec 2012 #19
Parenthood outlasts marriage. undeterred Dec 2012 #22
So? Marinedem Dec 2012 #29
I guess the proof is in the body count. undeterred Dec 2012 #37
You're a shitty guesser Shivering Jemmy Dec 2012 #57
Yeah, and you're a genius. undeterred Dec 2012 #115
I thought that both the brother and father said they hadn't spoken to Adam in years. Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #135
I agree. undeterred Dec 2012 #144
Bravo Saboburns Dec 2012 #42
Responsibility for safety issues of the former spouse's personal property, kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #83
Did he fail to secure firearms used in a mass murder? jberryhill Dec 2012 #20
She filed for divorce WolverineDG Dec 2012 #24
"Abandoned"? What a pig-ignorant post. nt Codeine Dec 2012 #25
Please describe how Peter Lanza... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2012 #26
Cheated. Nt IdaBriggs Dec 2012 #153
Really???? RetroLounge Dec 2012 #28
Hit & Run OP too. eom ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2012 #36
been here for years. hardly a hit/run poster elehhhhna Dec 2012 #91
Hit & run posting has nothing to do with how long you've been here... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2012 #99
the first sentence of the OP alludes to the point elehhhhna Dec 2012 #103
wise up. GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #31
Way to elevate the discussion. Not. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #34
Well, that is the usual. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #35
In a gun case I'd usually place the blame on the father xmas74 Dec 2012 #90
Yeah. When she kicks him out of the house and cashes the $250,000 annual alimony check. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2012 #93
It is easier to smear the dead. Union Scribe Dec 2012 #39
Probably because they were apparently HER guns, left unlocked. nt Lex Dec 2012 #43
An Absent Dad Is Never Good otohara Dec 2012 #47
wow, are you not a deep thinker. You know people get divorced, right? Logical Dec 2012 #48
That is how it always goes. redqueen Dec 2012 #49
Well, he did live with his mom and it was her guns used. tammywammy Dec 2012 #66
No Sissyk Dec 2012 #82
What about the gun access? brush Dec 2012 #177
Again, Sissyk Dec 2012 #192
You're ignoring the obvious brush Dec 2012 #193
There is not enough information Dorian Gray Dec 2012 #150
Abadoned his 'first' family? one_voice Dec 2012 #50
Um, from Newtown to Stamford is like less than an hour away. Jennicut Dec 2012 #52
Careful Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #55
Exactly. They were only divorced three years ago. redqueen Dec 2012 #59
Does blaming anyone make anyone seriously feel better? Live and Learn Dec 2012 #58
Maybe after the guns began stacking up he feared for his own safety? NNN0LHI Dec 2012 #62
This is complete Bullshit. mn9driver Dec 2012 #63
this is not about you elehhhhna Dec 2012 #67
That's right. The thread is about Mr. Lanza, who no one here knows anything about. /nt mn9driver Dec 2012 #75
this thread is actually about people blaming the mother elehhhhna Dec 2012 #84
That would be why you started it like this: mn9driver Dec 2012 #88
we have an ignore feature. use it. elehhhhna Dec 2012 #97
Heh. I think I'll retain the ability to view and rebut. mn9driver Dec 2012 #102
Some states recognize that women are owed an equitable distribution of the assets, not just the msanthrope Dec 2012 #189
Exactly customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #73
Well you beat me there NNN0LHI Dec 2012 #79
Hey MN9driver Puglover Dec 2012 #203
I am not sure blaming anyone is the answer, but that's what people do. Avalux Dec 2012 #64
I am seeing a lot of evidence that his mother did love and care for him. Chemisse Dec 2012 #165
Don't ever let a ... 99Forever Dec 2012 #65
I do not blame either one. Sissyk Dec 2012 #70
Reasons for the divorce aside customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #72
Enough with the blame. How about some solutions for a change. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #74
+1000 Sissyk Dec 2012 #85
+2000 nt Live and Learn Dec 2012 #106
We're ALL to blame? 99Forever Dec 2012 #107
Yes I did mean it. And it should offend. We need to be offended. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #109
How am I to blame? 99Forever Dec 2012 #112
Because you are also a member of society. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #113
What utter hogwash. 99Forever Dec 2012 #118
It's OK. We're on the same side. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #122
You're a hypocrite. tedzbear Dec 2012 #151
When I say we are all to blame, I mean as a society we are all to blame. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #182
She supplied the weapons of mass destruction. nt valerief Dec 2012 #78
To me, that really is amuse bouche Dec 2012 #171
In what way did the father have control over the mother's kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #80
Wow just wow Drew Richards Dec 2012 #86
and thy shall know them by their spelling elehhhhna Dec 2012 #98
"THY shall know them by their spelling"...? regnaD kciN Dec 2012 #131
Well, she was a she. What more do we need? Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #87
Nope. No misandry on DU. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2012 #92
As the poster of the op that started this... Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #166
Try this one on for size. If custody had been awarded to dad, maybe this wouldn't have happened. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2012 #95
Sounds like dad left all that "old-family" trouble behind--wonder if he kept TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #96
How do you know he abandoned them. I wouldn't say 28 yr married is abandment. southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #101
Dad was cheating, hence the divorce. Nt IdaBriggs Dec 2012 #154
There are tons of people who cheat on spouses but it doesn't lead to a 20 yr old southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #158
He "abandoned" the marriage by cheating. IdaBriggs Dec 2012 #170
Do you have a link for that claim? n/t Fumesucker Dec 2012 #181
At least one link in one of the half a dozen IdaBriggs Dec 2012 #186
I've read a bunch of threads on this and haven't seen that Fumesucker Dec 2012 #187
Abandoned has a specific meaning in a divorce situation. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #167
i agree with your opinion also. Although divorice is very hard I don't think he just southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #168
280,000/yr alimony == abandoned. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #183
Yep she was crying all the way to the bank. southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #185
now let's mix some gender bashing into this wonderful event..... spanone Dec 2012 #104
Wow. That's a pretty desperate stretch. 2/10 leeroysphitz Dec 2012 #105
I wish Mom had kept her impressive gun collection locked away (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #111
How do you know she didn't? Common Sense Party Dec 2012 #126
I betcha that was the reason for the divorce. He'd found himself a new sweetie. nt raccoon Dec 2012 #114
Yes, all men are evil philanderers Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #116
That scenario happened to several people in my family. In one case, my family member raccoon Dec 2012 #120
As long as we're speaking anecdotally Floyd_Gondolli Dec 2012 #121
I betcha you don't know jack shit about what happened regnaD kciN Dec 2012 #132
doubt it H2O Man Dec 2012 #119
Emphatic K&R! But please do see my OP started in response to your coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #136
i'm not letting him off the hook, i would like to hear more from him JI7 Dec 2012 #138
He tried to atone for his cheating, at least lbrtbell Dec 2012 #139
"Daddy didn't give attention to the fact that mommy didn't care" underpants Dec 2012 #148
I've been thinking of that song and that video too... IcyPeas Dec 2012 #208
Does EVERY issue on DU have to boil down to the man v. woman thing? joeunderdog Dec 2012 #152
Amen! nt raccoon Dec 2012 #162
People do this after every shooting. It's not fair. Dash87 Dec 2012 #184
Are you saying people should remain married forever no matter what? Welcome_hubby Dec 2012 #188
Or perhaps because when he left her he promised her she'd never have to work again? Iris Dec 2012 #206
 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
1. Well, your statement there doesn't sound quite fair......
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:11 PM
Dec 2012

You don't know, maybe he tried to get custody, but the nutty ass mother won over the court.

She didn't work and lived in a 1.6 million dollar home, I don't think its fair to say that the father 'abandoned' his 'first family'

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
2. From what I read, she initiated the divorce.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:12 PM
Dec 2012

I'm not one to exonerate men who abandon a wife and family for a new and younger wife, but that does not seem to be the case here.

krawhitham

(4,634 posts)
68. From what I read, she initiated the divorce after he was caught cheating
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:16 PM
Dec 2012

When you cheat you are abandoning your family

Warpy

(110,907 posts)
3. Right, Dad is never responsible for anything in these scenarios
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:12 PM
Dec 2012

even though he could well have been the reason Mama thought she needed that arsenal. Who knows? Or they all could have been gun crazy. Who knows?

We just don't know enough yet. We will probably never know enough. We just know that leaving deadly weapons where an angry young male could get to them easily was a bad idea.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
32. well, personally I'm going with what the people who knew her have said
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:56 PM
Dec 2012

That she was a wonderful mother and person who grew up on a farm and simply liked target shooting with guns. The only place I've ever heard that she was a whack job or a kooky survivalist or was irresponsible with her guns is on DU with nothing at all to back it up. It's also only on DU that I've read anything at all that Adam was a violent homicidal maniac and that his mother knew this when everything said points to his being non-violent but obviously mentally disturbed in some way. Adam's own family is shocked and trying to wrap their heads around why he did this horrible thing. One person that has been reporting such nice things about her is her ex-sister-in-law, but far be it from so many people here to pay attention to what the people that actually knew this family have to say and just make up their own minds according to whatever their own personal gun agenda is and slam a mother who was just murdered by her own son as if this terrible crime is all her fault and never mind that she is counted among the dead and is just as much a victim as all the other dead victims.

Why is it assumed that it was KNOWN by anyone that he was an angry young male and so angry that he felt the desire to go shoot a bunch of people including his own mother and himself? He had no record of violence, and not a single person that knew him described him angry. He was odd, he had mental problems, his behavior was not considered normal, but not one single person believed he showed any sign whatsoever of being angry and so much so that he would shoot anyone much less his own mother and a bunch of totally innocent little kids and teachers. Geez, people here talk about him like everyone knew he was dangerous and was walking around with "Dangerous Homicidal Maniac" tattooed on his forehead or something. It's obvious in hindsight that he was a dangerous homicidal mentally disturbed individual, but not one thing has been reported by a single soul that knew him expressed anything about him that was angry or violent. Before this incident he had no known history of either by anyone and being a loner and non-communicator he carried his worst demons in his own head that no one including his own family members knew was there.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
38. Thank you for this
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:11 PM
Dec 2012

Thank you

Thank you

Thank you


You've done me a great service. Ive been so ashamed of how inhuman this place has been this weekend.

Salaam Aleikum

Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
146. It's anger
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:10 AM
Dec 2012

I also think it's people desperately trying to make sense of this. Blaming the mother somehow makes it make sense in their minds. "Their family was messed up. This couldn't possibly happen to me!"

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
179. So true. The survival, primitive part of the human brain does this
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:46 AM
Dec 2012

repeatedly. We want to frame incidents that are potentially threatening to our well being by creating a survival scenario. So if we see a situation that is a potential threat we look for what we might consider mitigating factors that would factor in favor of our survival as perceived by us. It is a way for the brain to not be overwhelmed. It is not logical, to think that it couldn't happen to us. That is why we sometimes want to blame the victim. What did they do wrong. Just forgive our brain which is not evolved as the human spirit. PTSD is complicated by this primitive brain function as the brain now identifies self as the problem and the reality that horrible things can and do happen to self and that threats are everywhere is overwhelming. There is no real safety. We only make attempts to reduce risks.

Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
196. That's an interesting way to look at it
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:20 PM
Dec 2012

I agree, though I also think in times of mourning, and the nation is mourning this incident, that people don't think clearly but some of those thoughts might clear up shortly. Initially it's why why why why why? That seems to matter less as the reality sets in.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
190. This is why the President said "today is not the day ..."
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:04 PM
Dec 2012

Knee jerk reactions are usually wrong.

Bake

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
40. You know why people do this...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:20 PM
Dec 2012

because we have to blame someone. The mother was the one who spent the most time with him so she um should have known he was dangerous and gotten him help and they could afford this so money and access was not the issue. And we like to think we can spot dangerous people, but we usually can't. It isn't like he looked normal by most accounts. But, he sure didn't look dangerous by several accounts. So, it's a comfort if you think you can spot the crazies or sense danger.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
51. stop reading my mind
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:44 PM
Dec 2012

I was just thinking about exactly what you're saying while reading and responding to another post but at the time I wrote it I was just getting the gist of what you're saying about the comfort of being able to spot the dangerously mentally ill, and was just sitting here pondering this and coming to pretty much the same conclusion.

I'm still not getting why so many people are blaming the mother and making up all kinds of crap about her while ignoring the person who actually did the deed. I don't get that. Is it because they think that because he was mentally ill he should be getting some kind of pass or don't want to appear to degenerate the mentally ill? I just don't get that. Surely one can understand hating what someone did but not hate them because their doing the deed was because of demons in their own head. Huh. Something else to ponder.


Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
147. It's all about
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:12 AM
Dec 2012

trying to comfort themselves. If they can blame the mother, then this families problems can never happen to their families. They aren't crazy. They aren't gun nuts. They aren't end of worlders. It provides comfort, in a way.

I think it's a normal coping mechanism. Trying to make sense of something that makes no sense at all.

Chemisse

(30,793 posts)
156. That makes a lot of sense.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:49 AM
Dec 2012

And makes me feel a bit better about the horrible things people have been saying here on DU.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
178. Not on DU it isn't
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:40 AM
Dec 2012

Oh no indeed. Here it's all about anti-gun agenda driving. When did DU ever demonize a parent of a mass murderer even when those parents and pretty much everyone that knew the murderer DID know they were dangerously and violently mentally ill? Never. When did DU start demonizing the mother in this case even though she was the first victim of this horrible crime? The moment it was reported that the guns used in the crime were her guns. Who are the people here that are demonizing the mother? The people here who are anti-gun. Who here has steadfastly NOT so much as hinted at blame of the actual person who committed this atrocious act? Same. Who here has insisted over and over that though not one single person that knew Adam had the slightest inkling that he could possibly be homicidal and had never shown any violence or even aggression by everyone who knew him yet insist that his mother magically HAD to know he was thereby being at fault for his killing her and using her guns to mass murder little children and teachers? Same.

In no way is this about normal coping mechanism here. No one on DU has ever done this before with any of the other mass murders by people who were KNOWN to be violently mentally ill and when none of the family members were victims of crimes. This is hateful ugly pure agenda driving that is so passionate they're willing to demonize the victim of the crime and flat out make up shit about her for no reason whatsoever than the fact that she owned the guns that were used by her son. Yeah, that guy. The one these people conveniently forget was the one who murdered his mother and all those young children and teachers.



Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
197. I was with you all the way through this thread
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:26 PM
Dec 2012

until this response to my post. I do think that's why many people are saying what they are saying. There are probably some gun "nuts" whose primary purpose is to protect their right to shoot things. A right I don't support. But, most people are searching for WHY. Trying to make sense of this. And it makes "sense" that the mother, the primary "caretaker" of Adam was at fault. That way it's just not as scary as it would be otherwise.

I don't blame the mother or the father or anyone else. Lanza's actions were his own. Whether he was truly mentally ill or not, we may never officially find out. My sister in law was killed almost two months ago by a driver who didn't see her. It was my mother in law and brother in law's instinct to be angry and blame the driver. The alternative, that she made a mistake by crossing a street at night without really looking was incomprehensible to them. But the driver did what he could do. He stopped. He called the police. He waited, despite my brother in law threatening to kill him while my SIL lay in the street. People need to assign blame, at least initially, so they can understand "why" something happens. It's not right. And certainly the father is no more deserving than the mother of assigning blame. The mother is a victim. The father's family is now fractured beyond repair. The survivors nor the dead deserve blame.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
140. Exactly.....
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:48 AM
Dec 2012

.... a wise post is a sea of ignorance from people who cannot accept the obvious fact that in this world, in this life, not everything is in our "control" and there is not always someone alive left to "blame".

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
46. his mother told the male bbsitter to never leave Adam in a room by himself.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:38 PM
Dec 2012

Not even to go to the bathroom. Adam as a youth needed to be watched every moment.

That means something.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
69. and it seems to mean that as a youth
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:17 PM
Dec 2012

he could hurt himself. Seeing as he had that rare condition where he was unable to feel physical pain, I can see why as a youth he needed to be watched all the time because he could inadvertently hurt himself and not be aware of it because he couldn't feel it. There was also a security guard at his school that said part of his job was to watch Adam for that very reason.

Either you or this babysitter is leaving something very important out here - WHY. Surely this woman that was so dedicated in making sure that he wasn't hurting himself knowing that he had a condition where he was incapable of feeling physical pain I'm sure she would have explained this to the babysitter as to why he needed to be constantly watched when he was young.


Michigan Alum

(335 posts)
134. Autism or Aspberger's do not cause one not to feel physical pain. Depression can make one feel numb
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:54 AM
Dec 2012

Emotionally.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
141. I wasn't talking about Autism or Asperger's
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 07:51 AM
Dec 2012

and have no idea why in the world you think I was. I was talking about a rare physical condition he suffered from where he was not able to feel PHYSICAL pain... congenital analgesia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenital_insensitivity_to_pain

Chemisse

(30,793 posts)
157. I agree - the babysitter left out that tidbit - or the reporter did.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:50 AM
Dec 2012

The story meant to imply that the child was violent.

Sedona

(3,769 posts)
60. Juvenile records are sealed by law...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:56 PM
Dec 2012

we have no idea what his record was before his 18th birthday....just sayin'

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
81. well he certainly showed no violent tendencies
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:43 PM
Dec 2012

to anyone as a youth or as an adult so I'm betting that there are no sealed juvenile records that show he had any violent altercations either. Surely with the significance of the incident if there was some violent altercation he was arrested for there would be all kinds of people coming out of the woodwork to talk all about it particularly the victim of some speculated youthful arrest for something violent he was speculated for being guilty of without a single shred of any evidence pointing to any such thing. Hell, people who didn't know this family existed at all are being interviewed with one dingaling disturbed by the fact that he just didn't know them at all. I don't know any place of that town's size where it's reasonable to believe that everyone actually does know everyone else and finding something disturbing in that. Although what's more disturbing is the media believed his total lack of knowledge of the the very existence of the family was someone significant to interview in the first place. Hey, why didn't they interview me! I not only never knew this family existed but never knew the town existed either!


This is exactly what I'm talking about. Giving significance for something that is not known to exist and which there has never been any indication of in the first place as a reason to demonize his family for not knowing he was a dangerous homicidal maniac. That's just flat out stupid. There's just no common sense in that. None whatsoever.


Sedona

(3,769 posts)
89. Exactly, thank you for making my point.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:55 PM
Dec 2012
Giving significance for something that is not known to exist


We have no evidence one way or another whether this disturbed young man had a history of violence. Let's not assume he didn't.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
100. so back we go to that common sense thing
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:38 PM
Dec 2012

Everyone that knew him has said he showed no signs whatsoever of any violent tendencies, so it's somehow reasonable to believe that he did despite no evidence of it whatsoever before the incident and go with whatever you personally want to believe and despite so many people that knew him saying that he had no signs of violent tendencies. Sure, that makes all kinds of sense. Let's just pretend that he might have had some history of violence that no one on the plant had ever known of and believe that there just has to be somebody out there that is the only personal in the whole world that knew he had a history of violence and just doesn't think it's important to say so after his mother and over nearly three dozen young children and teachers lay dead at his hand.



 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
61. The mother used horrible judgment in keeping a lot of guns around a mentally disturbed son.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:59 PM
Dec 2012

Beyond that, we don't know much.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
94. what sort of mental disturbance?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:14 PM
Dec 2012

I guess you could say I'm mentally disturbed since I have panic attacks and bouts of mild depression, but I would never think to shoot anyone including my own self. The only reason anyone doesn't have guns around me is because I don't want them around me and make that known.

Given the fact that not a single person who knew him had any inkling that he was either suicidal or homicidal and did know that he did know how to handle guns and went target shooting with his mother and brother and apparently also his father and was never known to handle them irresponsibly despite having some sort of mental illness why would the mother have believed that having guns in the house was horrible judgment? This woman loved her son and lived in the home with him. Do you really honestly believe if she had the slightest inkling that having guns in the house was a bad idea because he might for no known reason kill himself or anyone else with herself being the closest target that she'd still keep guns in the house??? Who the hell does that??? Don't you think her normal motherly and human concern for her own and her son's safety that if she had the slimmest of all possible thoughts that he might kill himself or someone else with her guns that she'd keep them in the house that she lived in with him???

This is more demonizing of the mentally ill and demonizing of a VICTIM of this horrible incident. Without knowing or exhibiting any indication whatsoever that he was dangerous to himself or others no guns should be around him when he had already shown perfectly fine gun handling and responsibility despite his mental illness? It's so easy to look at what he did in hindsight and point fingers of blame isn't it though it's pretty sicko to point fingers of blame at one of the victims of what he did and without pointing them at he who did it? He had no known suicidal or homicidal signs whatsoever according to everyone that knew him and had also previously shown that despite having a mental illness he WAS responsible around and using guns. It is only this incident that revealed to anyone that he in fact was both suicidal and homicidal, but you expect that somehow his mother should have known this despite there being no evidence for it, and she ended up paying for not being clairvoyant with her very life.


TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
137. And what has Ryan actually SAID?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:38 AM
Dec 2012

He's said NOTHING. Your "seeming" and "betting" that Ryan or the father somehow knew Adam was suicidal and homicidal comes from absolutely nothing other than your own agenda since there is nothing whatsoever reported by anyone to indicate your personal agenda driven feelings concerning the family members of the person who actually DID the atrocious act who you and others are conveniently NOT demonizing or even blaming for it are anything more than something you just pulled out of your own butt for NO OTHER REASON that they enjoyed shooting guns at inanimate targets.

Thank you for so eloquently proving my point with this idiotic rubbish and demonizing of a heartbroken family whose brother/son murdered their mother/ex-wife and nearly three dozen innocent people most of whom were little children all while oh so conveniently ignoring even so much as a hint of blame or demonization of the person that actually DID this horrific crime. This shit is DISGUSTING and you should be utterly ashamed for it.


Nay

(12,051 posts)
202. Actually, it's because I have a very long name that my baby brother could not say, and "Nay"
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 04:06 PM
Dec 2012

was the closest he could come to it. But thanks for the guess. I guess.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
199. Here's what Ryan Lanza said, as reported in the UK Daily Mail....
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 03:57 PM
Dec 2012

Ryan Lanza said:

'It was my brother. I think my mother is dead. Oh my God': Moment accountant sibling of school shooter saw himself named as killer on TV in case of mistaken identity

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248327/Ryan-Lanza-Moment-brother-Adam-Lanza-saw-CNN-mistakenly-report-Sandy-Hook-shooter.html#ixzz2FR0vfmBi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

As I said in the comment above, which everyone seemed so upset about, Ryan basically named his brother as the killer, and was worried about his mother who, as it turned out, was indeed dead, although he did not know it at the time he made that statement. Now, I'm speculating here, but am I crazy for making the mental jump to suspecting that if the 24-yr-old brother knew immediately who the killer must be, that the father probably knew as well? And that the 2 of them, consciously or unconsciously, removed themselves from the family because they felt they no longer had any control over the situation and were afraid of the possible consequences? As it turned out, they were correct. If they had stayed in that house, they each would have had 4 bullets to the head, most likely.

With the state of the mental health system AND its unwillingness to lock up people until AFTER a bunch of people die, what else did you want the father and brother to do?

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
108. I also want to thank you
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:06 PM
Dec 2012

profusely for this. It is like a mob mentality here right now. I understand people's emotional response because I am going through my own but some of the posts I am reading are freaking me out.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
125. Very well said
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:27 AM
Dec 2012

It is been exhausting reading these boards in the last few days as the hyper emotional seek a bogeyman other then the man responsible.

Flabbergasted

(7,826 posts)
127. He did have an "altercation" with four office staff at the school. Sounds serious to
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:49 AM
Dec 2012

me. It is likely his mother was informed. He was probably scolded by his mother in the least about the incident.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
133. No he didn't
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:46 AM
Dec 2012

That story was yet another media boo-boo reporting speculation as fact. He was not at the school the day before and did not have an altercation with anyone there.

"Vance {Connecticut State Police Lt. Paul Vance} said it appears that reports of an altercation involving Lanza at the school in the days before the mass slaying are not checking out."
http://abcnews.go.com/US/connecticut-school-shooting-president-obama-meet-victims-families/story?id=17981351&page=2#.UM7XV3q4qSo

There has been not one single report by anyone that knew him that he ever displayed any aggression or violence whatsoever. What was so noticeable about him that everyone that knew him commented on was that he was just the opposite: uncommunicative, shy, withdrawn, fearful, socially awkward and it was typical of him to escape interaction with people even those he knew and trusted.

Richard Novia — who until 2008 was the school district's head of security and adviser to the school's technology club, of which Lanza was a member — described Lanza to the AP as "a loner."

"You had yourself a very scared young boy, who was very nervous around people," he added.

Novia said Lanza had extreme difficulties relating to fellow students and teachers, as well as a strange bodily condition: "If that boy would've burned himself, he would not have known it or felt it physically."

Lanza would also go through crises that would require his mother to come to school to deal with them. Such episodes might involve "total withdrawal from whatever he was supposed to be doing, be it a class, be it sitting and reading a book," Novia told the AP.

When people approached Lanza in the hallways, he would press himself against the wall or walk in a different direction, clutching his black briefcase "like an 8-year-old who refuses to give up his teddy bear," said Novia, who now lives in Tennessee.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/15/15933406-connecticut-school-shooter-was-very-nervous-around-people?lite

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
143. I haven't had time to read the threads you refer to but I thinkyou are correct. There is only one
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:02 AM
Dec 2012

fact that should be held against the mother.

She didn't keep the guns in a gun safe.

It is unfortunate and she paid for it with her life.

There is no excuse for it, if you are going to have guns you need a secure facility to keep them. Period.

Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
145. Thank you for this
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:08 AM
Dec 2012

I would like to add that I think people who are trying to make sense of this and why a 20 year old male would do something like this are making stuff up in their minds to link it all together.

Chemisse

(30,793 posts)
155. Thank you! I am so sick of the 'holier than thou s'
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:46 AM
Dec 2012

who are so quick to condemn people they have never known, and know next to nothing about.

I prefer to assume that mothers do the very best they can for their children - unless this is proven otherwise.

There are all sorts of situations which may have been happening here. The guns could have been locked up tight, and he found a way to access them. She could have trusted him completely, particularly if he had never shown signs of violence. I know I trust my son; mothers tend to want to do that, sometimes in the face of contraindications.

And it may be - most probably is - true that she was careless in some way that allowed him to get the guns. If that is the case, then she is fallible like the rest of us. She should not have had to pay with her life. And she surely does not deserve to have the hatred of the world upon her.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
169. Why did she need assault weapons?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:45 AM
Dec 2012

She may be all that. But you must include "gun nut" in that description.

brush

(53,470 posts)
175. Why weren't the guns locked up?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:13 AM
Dec 2012

That's a huge failing as a parent, I don't care how caring a mother or non-threatening the son seemed. You secure those guns because who knows what can happen. This time the unthinkable did because of easy access to guns.

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
176. FWIW the "survivalist" part is not just DU
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:21 AM
Dec 2012
http://www.calgaryherald.com/sports/School+shootings+Gunman+mother+survivalist+collected+guns/7706852/story.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248983/Connecticut-school-shooting-Adam-Lanzas-survivalist-mother-obsessed-guns.html

http://govtslaves.info/school-shooters-mom-was-a-survivalist-who-stockpiled-food-water-and-guns-believed-world-was-on-edge-of-collapse/

Now maybe these are all from a single source. But it is incorrect to say this only a DU thing. It is fine to resist jumping to conclusions but there does appear to be at least some evidence that there was something a little strange in that household. Neighbors also talked about the fact that the mother never wanted outsiders inside the house.
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. Well, we don't know everything. But the mom kept the firearms, right?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:14 PM
Dec 2012

No I don't know that she wasn't forced by him to keep them, and to keep them available to the son.

But it was her house and the guns were, too, apparently.

Like I said, we don't know all the details so I'm not going to lay blame on either parent more than the other.

joeunderdog

(2,563 posts)
27. details, shmeetails.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:41 PM
Dec 2012

I would've left a gun toting survivalist whack job too, but I guess they are calling that abandonment these days.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
7. The guns belonged to the mother. And they were some pretty scary guns.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:17 PM
Dec 2012

Maybe her husband was afraid of her? I agree that these cases usually happen the other way, but come on.

mentalsolstice

(4,454 posts)
8. I read in several places that she initiated the divorce
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:17 PM
Dec 2012

And that he was very upset over the breakup. He was giving her $200,000+ per year for alimony, according to his attorney the amount was a non-issue. I wonder if they broke up because they couldn't agree about what to with Adam. I swear the more I read about this the more I'm reminded of the book/movie "We Need to Talk About Kevin."

Nay

(12,051 posts)
12. This was exactly my take on it, too. He was already giving her more alimony than was required,
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:23 PM
Dec 2012

he had joint custody, she initiated the divorce, no one was making her do anything. I suspect that once she divorced him, he talked the older brother into leaving the area so that they both were not near Adam. I think the dad knew he was dangerous, the mom was not in agreement, and dad and other son had no influence (esp since Adam was almost 18 at time of divorce) and got themselves out of the way as much as possible.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
123. All of this is speculative at this point
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:51 PM
Dec 2012

IIRC an aunt was talking to the press was the only family member saying anything. The brother and father have been silent to the press

Nay

(12,051 posts)
201. Of course it is. I am not a reporter writing a story, or an author writing a book. I am just
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 04:04 PM
Dec 2012

collating the info as given, and speculating on the reasons why the brother and father seemingly took themselves completely out of the family. I have to say, though, that it is not at all unusual for mentally healthy people to cut themselves off completely from mentally ill family members; it seems to be a way of healing the self and finding a peace that was never present in the family dynamics.

What's really sad is that we have no place except the family to put these types of folks. That's where society has dropped the ball.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
129. In one article I read, the older brother Ryan had not had contact with his younger
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 02:05 AM
Dec 2012

brother since 2010.

Bizarre that the younger brother had some of the older's ID.

The family situation seems really messed up.

Siwsan

(26,177 posts)
9. There is far too much we don't, and may never, know about their family dynamic
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:18 PM
Dec 2012

I can't begin to grasp the kind of shock and horror the survivors of the shooter's family must be going through, also. The ex-husband seems to have been supporting his son and ex-wife in pretty good style, since she was able to live what seems like a very comfortable lifestyle, AND have enough left over to hoard food and weapons. I'm pretty much thinking that these two men had a lucky escape from being victims, themselves.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
14. he was a gun owner as well. reports were the "entire family" used to go to shooting range together
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:29 PM
Dec 2012

so, it's possible he was part of all this whole gun loving scenario as recently as three years ago.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
30. yeah, I think they are being a bit unfair to the mom for sticking it out. parents have few options
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:50 PM
Dec 2012

with mentally ill kids once they turn 18. and she was an idiot if she didn't secure the guns.
but we don't know if this kid ambushed her and took them by force or if they were readily available.
it's unfortunate she did not consider the big risk involved if she had keys to the gun cabinet in that house while the kids was alone there.
but i've heard some DUers do the same thing- saying it's too much trouble to take the keys with them everywhere. i don't get it.

No Vested Interest

(5,156 posts)
128. Mom was in bed in her pajamas
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:55 AM
Dec 2012

when son shot her four times.
We don't know if she was sleeping or awake enough to know what hit her.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
45. And that's really where the rubber meets the road
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:32 PM
Dec 2012

Clearly either she underestimated the depth of her sons mental problems, or didn't do a very good job keeping the guns out of his hands. Or both. Either way that led to 20 first graders being massacred along with her own senseless murder.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
13. The landscaper who knew the mother said that she had a lot of bad things to say
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:28 PM
Dec 2012

about her ex, and that the son never saw him. So on the surface it looked very cordial, but in front of her son- he was hearing all the emotional debris. He hardly ever saw his father and evidently didn't feel that he was someone he could turn to. Then one day he broke into his mothers gun case, shot her in the face while she slept, and went to his grade school and shot and killed 20 children and 6 adults before turning the gun on himself.

So I'd say neither parent really knew what was going on in his head.

egduj

(804 posts)
15. Personally, I blame the son more than either the mother or father.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:30 PM
Dec 2012

But that's just me. I come up with some kooky thoughts every now and then.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
77. I must be kooky also
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:33 PM
Dec 2012

The shooter is to blame for all 26 victims.

We too are asking why. We are fully cooperating with law enforcement. We are deeply saddened and still do not know now. - Peter Lanza statement. Not quoted because I just saw it again on CNN and paraphrased.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
16. We are all a product of our childhoods to some degree...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:30 PM
Dec 2012

but I think that this goes far beyond anything that can by comprehended.

My guess is that the family of the young man is suffering because of what he did.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
19. What the ever loving fuck are you talking about. Seriously.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:33 PM
Dec 2012

New law guys: Marriage is until death.

I could recommend some good fundy orgs for you to look into.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
29. So?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:49 PM
Dec 2012

What proof do you have that he wasn't there for his son?

None?

Oh. Good.

What is it with people doing Olympics level mental gymnastics in order to spread the personal blame for this incident onto anyone but the low down piece of worm infested dog shit that shot those poor children and teachers?

Michigan Alum

(335 posts)
135. I thought that both the brother and father said they hadn't spoken to Adam in years.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:03 AM
Dec 2012

I thought how sad that must be for a child - sick or not.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
83. Responsibility for safety issues of the former spouse's personal property,
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:44 PM
Dec 2012

however, does NOT.

And the father is not responsible for the acts of his adult son.

The mom dropped the ball. She knew her son well. She, of all people, should have known the importance of locking the guns up when not in use.

WolverineDG

(22,298 posts)
24. She filed for divorce
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 01:39 PM
Dec 2012

The dad gave her more than he was legally required to do & at his insistence!! If she cut him out of her life & his son, doesn't sound to me like that's his fault.

But of course we have to blame a man for this. something like this can NEVER be the fault of a woman.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
91. been here for years. hardly a hit/run poster
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:02 PM
Dec 2012

pay attention

And, some of y'all need to work on your reading comprehension, I see

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
99. Hit & run posting has nothing to do with how long you've been here...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:34 PM
Dec 2012

It's when someone posts an OP and then doesn't stick around to tend to it and participate in the conversation.

I know you been here for years (your profile/post count makes that clear) and I have no issue with you and I'm glad you returned to the thread.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
103. the first sentence of the OP alludes to the point
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:48 PM
Dec 2012

well, it MORE than alludes to the point. Commentary on the rush to judgement of the mother, no mention of the father, etc.





Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
35. Well, that is the usual.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:04 PM
Dec 2012

It has always been a woman's fault, never a man's fault. He had no responsibility whatsoever for raising his son to know right from wrong. That fell on her shoulders.

That is pretty much how the majority of people always look at it. Have you noticed that too?

xmas74

(29,658 posts)
90. In a gun case I'd usually place the blame on the father
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:57 PM
Dec 2012

since that's who usually takes the kids out to hunt or is usually the one who is more involved in the gun culture. (At least that's the case where I live. Yes, women here hunt and yes, they collect but the majority are white lower-middle and "middle-middle" class males.) In this case, the child had some sort of mental issues and yet the mother kept dangerous weapons around. She should have thought about her own safety and the safety of her child.

I have a friend-big gun enthusiast/gun rights/NRA-type. He made the statement that if any of his children ever show any signs of any kind of mental health issues he'll move the guns immediately out of his house. (He has a friend who will keep them for him.) A coworker from years back did just that-her son showed signs of depression and she moved their guns out of their house (and got him the treatment he needed.) I remember her asking coworkers if they had room in their gun cabinets for her rifles and explaining exactly why. In her case, even though her hunting rifles were kept in a locked cabinet she didn't trust it and knew that, if push came to shove, there might be a chance he could get access. (She made mention of him getting the keys while she slept.)

It's not a mother/father issue here. It's not a gun issue. It's about responsible gun ownership and this woman was irresponsible. If the father still lived in the home and this had happened he too would also be partly responsible for what happened. Responsible gun owners do not keep weapons of that caliber in a home with someone who has diagnosed illnesses.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
93. Yeah. When she kicks him out of the house and cashes the $250,000 annual alimony check.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:10 PM
Dec 2012

The downside is she's responsible for what subsequently takes place in her home.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
47. An Absent Dad Is Never Good
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:38 PM
Dec 2012

as a child of a somewhat disturbed and sometimes alcoholic mother - she was scary, and my dad was a gentle soul who never recovered from PTSD from WWII was scared of her too. He moved here when I was in my preteens, but it was too late. I didn't know him, he never sent birthday, Christmas cards, nothing. At that age, I shunned him for leaving us with this crazy woman and then he passed away a few years later.

My mother pretty much ruined the lives of her kids.
I survived, but she still haunts me, even though she's been dead for 30 years.

redqueen

(115,096 posts)
49. That is how it always goes.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:39 PM
Dec 2012

If dad did bad things or was negligent, then mom will be blamed for causing his behavior, too.

So much speculation, and almost all targeting mom. Telling, but far from surprising.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
66. Well, he did live with his mom and it was her guns used.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:11 PM
Dec 2012

Seems appropriate that blame is being placed on her and not the father.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
82. No
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:43 PM
Dec 2012

Blame should be placed on the shooter. Not the mother or father but the shooter.

COme on, people!

brush

(53,470 posts)
177. What about the gun access?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:32 AM
Dec 2012

She didn't pull the triggers but she didn't secure the guns from a disturbed son. That's huge. Without the guns, no massacre.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
192. Again,
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:32 PM
Dec 2012

No information has been released that says the guns were not secure.

It is the shooter that pulled the trigger. Mom was a victim.

Dorian Gray

(13,469 posts)
150. There is not enough information
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:25 AM
Dec 2012

to blame either the mother or father. Unless we learn of horrific abuse by them, truly, Adam Lanza was an adult who did this one his own. His mother did not put the gun in his hand and tell him to kill people. His mother was one of his victims.

Why are we blaming her?

BC it helps us make sense of this totally senseless act.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
50. Abadoned his 'first' family?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:43 PM
Dec 2012

What proof do you have of this? I've read that he was very upset about the divorce and was generous with alimony over his lawyers advice. How do you know he didn't fight for custody and lost? How do you know he didn't spend time with his children? You don't know--this is a hit and run OP if I've ever seen one.

The only 'blame' I would 'place' on mom is having so many guns in a home where there was an mentally unstable adult. It appears they weren't secured, but as far as I know we don't know that for sure. If they were maybe he overpowered her and some how gained access. But in any case, I don't think it was wise to even have them in the house. Maybe she didn't think/know he was as ill as he was.

It's so easy to point fingers--we want and need someone to blame. I blame the lack of mental health care in the country. The stigma still attached to mental illness. We need to fix the system to care for people who have mental illness and make them throw away people, or hide them.

I will wait until all the details are out before I come to any conclusions--as to the mother, father etc. I've already stated my feelings on the mental health care the country provides

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
52. Um, from Newtown to Stamford is like less than an hour away.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:45 PM
Dec 2012

He stayed in Connecticut. Anywhere in CT is not that far away, we are the third smallest state in the United States. Also, Adam Lanza was about 17 when his parents divorced. Not a young child by any means.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
55. Careful
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:49 PM
Dec 2012

Probably not a good idea to let facts get in the way of an old fashioned "all divorced dads are evil" thread.

It's the man's fault etc.

Stick to the script.

redqueen

(115,096 posts)
59. Exactly. They were only divorced three years ago.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:55 PM
Dec 2012

Yet most of the comments here target "mom" as if he had nothing to do with his sons life.

mn9driver

(4,412 posts)
63. This is complete Bullshit.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:04 PM
Dec 2012

My wife ambushed me with divorce papers after 28 years of marriage. The first I knew she was considering one was when the process server put the papers in my hand. I tried for reconciliation and she would have none of it. She and her lawyer got me thrown out of my house, forced me to take out a huge loan to pay the insane legal bills they ran up, and she gets 2/3 of my income for the indefinite future. It cost well over six figures in legal bills much of which I (not her) still owe to BOTH lawyers and the ONLY thing I contested was how much time I had with my children.

Because she never worked during the marriage, I am legally obligated to pay her full support for the rest of her life. She is 50. She is obviously mentally/emotionally unstable and there is NOTHING I can do about it. The court awarded me a few days per month with my children after a very expensive fight and she tells them constantly what a bad person I am, how her life is so hard, and that I don't love them because I won't pay for their future college or expensive summer camps. She doesn't mention that I can't do that because my retirement is gone and I can barely pay my monthly bills. Her constant messaging is having the desired effect: They are often wary and emotionally distant when they come over.

She is a very sick and angry person who sounds a great deal like Mrs. Lanza; minus the guns, thank god---with a lawyer who is happy to be her "protector". She has hundreds of thousands of dollars at her disposal. I have $363.46 in my savings account. I found a wonderful divorced woman in my church choir, we fell in love and are now very happily married with her two young daughters and we live a small, happy life in a small house. When I have my kids (and the rest of the time, too), we do everything we can to model what a happy and healthy family is, but make no mistake: their mother has a huge influence on them and it is NOT good.

So, until you know a little more about Mr. Lanza than you do, I suggest you keep what you think he "must" be like to yourself.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
67. this is not about you
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:13 PM
Dec 2012

although I can't see how the courts granted her 2/3rds of your income unless your name is Mr. Duggar. SOunds like you had a lousy lawyer. I'm sorry you got dealt such a bad hand, though.
 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
84. this thread is actually about people blaming the mother
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:46 PM
Dec 2012

and suggesting the father had no responsibility here and was, to many peole, overfullfiling his parental duties by paying extra support.

mn9driver

(4,412 posts)
88. That would be why you started it like this:
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:55 PM
Dec 2012

"Lots of blame for the Mother. Apparently Dad's off the hook , though, [View all]

I guess b/c he abandoned his "first" family and started a new one?"

Right.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
189. Some states recognize that women are owed an equitable distribution of the assets, not just the
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 02:19 PM
Dec 2012

50-50 split. When you spend the majority of your life raising kids, making a home, making it possible for the father of the children to work, you earn rights to not just child support, but alimony that compensates you for the decisions you made as a family.

I did family law before I did criminal defense. IMHO, 99 out 100 times, anyone who tells you they were 'surprised' by divorce papers wasn't paying attention to the shithole of the marriage.

What I normally find very telling in these situations is how quickly a 'new' family unit is formed, complete with children.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
73. Exactly
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

The courts treat men as devils and women as angels, even when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And there's just about nothing that a non-custodial parent can do to get their kid some effective treatment before they turn eighteen.

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. Thanks for posting this to the blamers.

NNN0LHI

(67,190 posts)
79. Well you beat me there
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:41 PM
Dec 2012

Wish I had $363.46 in a savings account. I don't even have a savings account.



Don

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
203. Hey MN9driver
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 04:08 PM
Dec 2012

Puglover retired crew coordinator here. Oh yeah, now they're "trackers"

Anyway nice to "see" you and I just wanted to say I am sorry to hear you went through so many troubles. I'm also happy to here that in the end things turned out so well for you.

I am on a 2nd marriage as well. And at least to me, they are the best things ever!

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
64. I am not sure blaming anyone is the answer, but that's what people do.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:08 PM
Dec 2012

We try to make some sort of sense out of something horrific and nonsensical so that we can manage it better in our own minds.

From what we've been told, Adam Lanza was a desperately troubled young man, isolated in a home with his mother who was preoccupied with turning it into a fortress in preparation for doomsday. His father lived in a town with his new family and it was probably easier for him to not pay attention to what was going on with his son. Both parents failed him; the kid had no support system whatsoever.

My heart grieves for Adam just as much as it does for him victims. I wish someone had cared and helped him somewhere along the way.

Chemisse

(30,793 posts)
165. I am seeing a lot of evidence that his mother did love and care for him.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:11 AM
Dec 2012

Love and care is not enough with severe mental illness, particularly the kind that is so well hidden until it erupts.

We don't know what his relationship was with his dad.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
70. I do not blame either one.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:19 PM
Dec 2012

I blame the shooter, and the shooter only.

I have said in other threads that the mother is a victim. She was the first victim as far as we know.

I dint blame the father either. He is a living victim.

How do you know he abandoned his first family?

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
72. Reasons for the divorce aside
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:22 PM
Dec 2012

wasn't she the one who purchased the weapons used?

If you want to possibly prevent your kid from meeting a similar fate, ask if his/her kindergarten teacher has both weapons and an unstable loser son at home.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
74. Enough with the blame. How about some solutions for a change.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:27 PM
Dec 2012

We are all to blame and we all need to work on solutions instead of pointing fingers.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
107. We're ALL to blame?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:56 PM
Dec 2012

Did you actually type that and mean it?

That's not just stupid and dead wrong, it's downright offensive.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
109. Yes I did mean it. And it should offend. We need to be offended.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:13 PM
Dec 2012

Every last one of us is responsible. And we will be responsible for the next one too and the one after that until we do something about it. I signed a petition today asking for a re-examination of the Second Amendment. It doesn't take away my sense of blame. I'm part of a society that puts an individual's right to carry guns above the safety of the most vulnerable and innocent. We are all to blame for that, to one degree or another. Finger pointing isn't going to help.
Calling the NRA evil is all well and good, but doesn't solve the problem. Our voice needs to be louder and LOUDER!

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
112. How am I to blame?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:20 PM
Dec 2012

Because I don't have the funds to buy Congress like the fucking NRA does? Because I haven't personally gone door to door to every dwelling in the land and taken their guns away? Just what the fuck is it you think I could have done that I failed to do? Specifically.

Ri-fucking-diculous.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
113. Because you are also a member of society.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:28 PM
Dec 2012

We all share a piece of this. If you are indifferent then so be it. It isn't for me to tell you what you, as an individual could or might do. That's up to you. I fight this fight every day and I'm to blame as much as any other.
If you have a problem with the word "blame" I can understand. Call it "responsibility".
You have a voice, use it. Use it to make change, not to defend yourself for being helpless.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
118. What utter hogwash.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:37 PM
Dec 2012

For your information, I already do all of those things and have for years, where the fuck have you been? You know the stuff you just claimed I wasn't doing. So no, I'll take zero % of the "blame" or the "responsibility" or any other damn label you put on it.


Ri-fucking-diculous.

tedzbear

(1,963 posts)
151. You're a hypocrite.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:27 AM
Dec 2012

You don't want any blaming but you turn around and blame everyone. Please speak for yourself and leave me out of it.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
182. When I say we are all to blame, I mean as a society we are all to blame.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:59 PM
Dec 2012

Sorry, but nobody gets left out until we fix it.

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
86. Wow just wow
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 03:52 PM
Dec 2012

Speaking in blanket generalities and inditments I could posit some statements about you just off your op...but it would be just as bad as you op statement....

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
166. As the poster of the op that started this...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:13 AM
Dec 2012

I would have blamed the dad had he been the one who directly enabled this tragedy. If in fact he also was a gun nut, a survivalist, and participated in the training of their mentally disturbed child in the art of gun slaughter, then he shares some of the blame. We all share some of the blame in fact, but that is a somewhat separate and very complicated issue.

Nancy Lanza kept a huge amount of ammunition, multiple magazines, etc for her several semi auto weapons. She did this (and I am speculating based on the reports of her survivalist beliefs) because she feared she would need to fight off some unspecified threat with all this firepower. She failed to keep her small arsenal secured. She kept these unsecured weapons in her home with her mentally disturbed child. Sorry if people find these facts discomforting. She directly enabled this tragedy.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
95. Try this one on for size. If custody had been awarded to dad, maybe this wouldn't have happened.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:18 PM
Dec 2012

It's no more loaded and biased than your premise.

It does have one ethical advantage, though; I'm not circling the wagons around the owner of the gun used to murder 20 first graders.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
96. Sounds like dad left all that "old-family" trouble behind--wonder if he kept
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:23 PM
Dec 2012

in touch with his son and ex-wife, especially given the young man's difficulties? If not, shame on him.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
101. How do you know he abandoned them. I wouldn't say 28 yr married is abandment.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:46 PM
Dec 2012

Maybe he got tired of her crazy ways with the end of the civilized world issues. Maybe it was just to much for him. His older son I think lives in NJ as the father. I'm not sure. The younger boy did have a choice.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
170. He "abandoned" the marriage by cheating.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:59 AM
Dec 2012

I responded only to your statement that he didn't "abandon" the marriage. While she initiated the divorce proceedings, he was the guy who screwed around. Alimony doesn't excuse the damage such behavior does to all parties involved, including children.

You take your victims as you find them. Many people don't end up with violence in their family with this type of history. Some do.

I am not privy to this family's private life, but for my money, Dad deserves blame as well as Mom. Perhaps if he had been a better partner with the mother of his children, they would have been able to work together to look out for the best interests of their son, and by extension, the other children in the community.

It is a "moral" judgment, not a legal one. Your opinion my differ.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
186. At least one link in one of the half a dozen
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:47 PM
Dec 2012

Threads discussed it. I read it from a link here on DU - something about he cheated, she hung out at a local watering hole drinking Chardonnay and only rarely talking about her personal troubles, but was bitter about the divorce, etc.

You can read through the different threads yourself or do a search. I find the topic depressing.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
187. I've read a bunch of threads on this and haven't seen that
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:50 PM
Dec 2012

Given the amount of outright false information on this incident so far I wouldn't believe a bit of hearsay without substantial corroboration.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
167. Abandoned has a specific meaning in a divorce situation.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:15 AM
Dec 2012

I rather doubt the op can back that claim up. They got divorced, she got custody. I rather suspect that there was no abandonment at all.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
168. i agree with your opinion also. Although divorice is very hard I don't think he just
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:33 AM
Dec 2012

up and left after 28 yrs of marriage.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
126. How do you know she didn't?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:44 AM
Dec 2012

Bright 20-year olds have been known to pick locks, find keys, and figure out combinations before.

I don't think blaming the victim (one of them) is helping, especially while the investigation is stil being conducted.

raccoon

(31,089 posts)
120. That scenario happened to several people in my family. In one case, my family member
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:39 PM
Dec 2012

was the sweetie.

I guess most people speak from their personal experience.


 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
121. As long as we're speaking anecdotally
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:49 PM
Dec 2012

I've seen it go the other way with people I know and have personally experienced it in a long term relationship. Absolutes are for the obtuse.

Truth is, it doesn't matter who was fucking who. The guns were in her name, and in her house.

lbrtbell

(2,389 posts)
139. He tried to atone for his cheating, at least
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:27 AM
Dec 2012

The divorce was an amicable one, and he supported his ex-wife completely so that she would never have to work again.

http://news.yahoo.com/gunmans-mother-kept-trials-home-life-hidden-010414000.html

Compare that with, say, scumbags like Newt Gingrich.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
148. "Daddy didn't give attention to the fact that mommy didn't care"
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:13 AM
Dec 2012

Those words have never been more true.

It is about parenting, friends, and it does take a village.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
184. People do this after every shooting. It's not fair.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:32 PM
Dec 2012

After Virginia Tech, people tourchered Cho's family, and blamed them for the massacre (including, ironically, death threats). They were victims too.

The truth is, nobody knows what was going on at the house, or with the family. The media is sensationalist and useless.

Adam Lanza was an adult. His mother is dead. His brother lost a brother and mom, and his father lost a son and ex-wife. Let's leave them alone. They feel horrible enough.

There's such an obsession with blame and justice in this country. It's why nothing ever gets done.

 

Welcome_hubby

(312 posts)
188. Are you saying people should remain married forever no matter what?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 02:09 PM
Dec 2012

even if they have irreconcilable differences?

Iris

(15,632 posts)
206. Or perhaps because when he left her he promised her she'd never have to work again?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 06:07 PM
Dec 2012

Interesting to think about.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lots of blame for the Mot...