General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs a "Sense of the Congress" interpretation of the 2A possible?
I know that SCOTUS has exclusive jurisdiction to tell us what the Constitution means.
Wonder if a majority of both chambers of the legislature could agree on a Sense of the Congress interpretation of the 2nd Amendment?
I.e., what's in there for? And what is its relevance to 21st century America?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)you might end up with a stricter interpretation in favor of gun ownership than the court has held. The majority of both chambers would probably end up with a pro-gun rights stance
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)and every 6 years a brand new senate
and every 2 a brand new house
with backing of anti-gun people it all can be done within 12 years
bossy22
(3,547 posts)first it would require a huge shift in a public opinion. Even 9/11 did not cause a long term shift that great. You also assume that anti-gun people will outnumber pro-gun people. I'm not so sure that will be the case. You would have to make their pro-gun side an insignificant minority and that will be very hard to do- remember the jewish vote is considered important and there are less than 6 million of them in the U.S.. This is because they are a "loud", politically active minority- how can you not say that doesnt hold true for pro-gun people?
Also, if your theory held true, Roe V wade would have been gone atleast a decade ago- but it hasn't. Yes, there has been modifications but the supreme court did not completely overturn it. I have a feeling the same will hold for Heller and Mcdonald.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)and there don't need to be change anyhow as the war on terror is ongoing and can incorporate basically anything
that is what congress already authorized
as the old thing said, that the Byrd's turned into a song (c)
"For every season turn turn turn"
the turning has begun
bossy22
(3,547 posts)Last time I checked both sides have been using social media quite effectively. In fact it can be argued that modern social media has lead to to the strength of the Pro-gun movement.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)since most of the Reagan/Bush I&II appointees have the peculiar notion that a literal interpretation of what was meant by the wording of the amendment in 1791 has any real relevance or meaning to its application to present-day society (in the case of "right to bear arms" and "well-regulated militia", at least, it's become increasingly clear that it probably doesn't).
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I believe one of the heavies is thinking of hanging it up
knowing the Dems will remain in the presidency for at least 12 more years
Most likely Scalia, and when he retires so will Thomas.
I figure President Obama to appoint 3 more or 4
and Kennedy is getting up in age too
I then figure in the 45 realm, it will lead to Roberts retiring and that leaves only Alito remaining
It will be 8 to 1 or 7 to 2