Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbabe

(6,648 posts)
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 01:33 PM Feb 2025

Trump's USAID gambit backfires as American farms now threatened: report

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-usaid-2671109943/

Trump's USAID gambit backfires as American farms now threatened: report

Brad Reed
February 6, 2025 12:18PM ET

President Donald Trump may have thought that defunding the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) would only hurt foreigners -- but it turns out he could actually be mistaken.

The Washington Post reports that putting shuttering the agency entirely "threatens billions of dollars the agency spends on American businesses and organizations."

In particular, the Post report notes that American farms are responsible for roughly 41 percent of all food aid provided by the agency and it adds that the U.S. government bought $2.1 billion in food aid from American farmers in the year 2020 alone.

"Purchases and shipments of U.S. food aid worth over $340 million — including rice, wheat and soybeans — have been paused during Trump’s foreign-aid freeze, according to officials and an email obtained by The Post," the paper reports. "That has left hundreds of tons of American-grown wheat stranded in Houston alone."

… more …

(Leopard eating face #389543)


37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's USAID gambit backfires as American farms now threatened: report (Original Post) cbabe Feb 2025 OP
This is what you get for attacking blue states for 45 years. Initech Feb 2025 #1
The thing about leopards is they don't care how many faces they eat. As many as possible is what they want. Walleye Feb 2025 #2
Maybe they should care about how many faces they eat Ray Bruns Feb 2025 #5
MAGA leopard will solve that problem by drinking diet coke IronLionZion Feb 2025 #7
Ha! Ray Bruns Feb 2025 #9
Obviously, there were too many faces available for him to eat Walleye Feb 2025 #20
"Ha ha. Farmers are suckers. Ha ha." - Felon 47 (R) and Presidont Muck (R) BoRaGard Feb 2025 #3
The more people he can fuck up the better. That is his desire. twodogsbarking Feb 2025 #4
I don't think J-9 Feb 2025 #19
no more than 20 percent are unaware prodigitalson Feb 2025 #32
They never think these things through Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2025 #6
Won't matter to the rest of the reactionary cult, though William Seger Feb 2025 #8
They all vote republican anyways wolfie001 Feb 2025 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author PJMcK Feb 2025 #11
Good. If that is what wakes these MAGA fools up, I welcome it. travelingthrulife Feb 2025 #12
These farmers have an imaginary understanding of their real situation Prairie Gates Feb 2025 #13
Agribusinesses took over years ago. Small cbabe Feb 2025 #14
That's not completely true ITAL Feb 2025 #22
You left out one aspect. yardwork Feb 2025 #17
It's not 100% Nasruddin Feb 2025 #30
I saw smug people wearing "Farmers for Trump" shirts last fall. yardwork Feb 2025 #15
Wait... USAID goes to food? maxsolomon Feb 2025 #16
The food they provide Mountainguy Feb 2025 #37
The farmers will blame Democrats Orrex Feb 2025 #18
They mean threatened even MORE sakabatou Feb 2025 #21
He just keeps fucking the farmers over. louis-t Feb 2025 #23
Mango Mussolini is also harming farmers in California's Central Valley by dumping billions of gallons of water... Hekate Feb 2025 #24
They're too busy putting signs and billboards up and down I-5 hating Newsom and Pelosi over "water freedom" NBachers Feb 2025 #28
When the farmer starts screaming he'll give them subsidies. GoodRaisin Feb 2025 #25
Yep, Senators chuckles grassley SharonClark Feb 2025 #35
Gosh-a-rooney, the consequences of gutting the USAID must be a Big Deal! Vogon_Glory Feb 2025 #26
They'll just say we should be keeping our food here in the states instead of shipping it out of country. Chakaconcarne Feb 2025 #27
I wonder what they would say if we actually did keep our agricultural surplus here, Aristus Feb 2025 #33
Hey farmers - Reap What You Sow, dude - Reap What You Sow NBachers Feb 2025 #29
Hoist by their own petard Blues Heron Feb 2025 #31
Eaters Cirsium Feb 2025 #34
"but it turns out he could actually be mistaken" ... YA THINK ?? eppur_se_muova Feb 2025 #36

Walleye

(44,806 posts)
2. The thing about leopards is they don't care how many faces they eat. As many as possible is what they want.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 01:36 PM
Feb 2025

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
3. "Ha ha. Farmers are suckers. Ha ha." - Felon 47 (R) and Presidont Muck (R)
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 01:37 PM
Feb 2025

republicons love to sucker people, then laugh at them. They think they are cute.

prodigitalson

(3,193 posts)
32. no more than 20 percent are unaware
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:23 PM
Feb 2025

around 40 percent are appalled and around 40 percent approve to the point of sexual arousal.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,713 posts)
6. They never think these things through
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 02:46 PM
Feb 2025

And he has the world's richest substance abuser advising him.

William Seger

(12,443 posts)
8. Won't matter to the rest of the reactionary cult, though
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:09 PM
Feb 2025

In addition to having recessive empathy genes, they are now compelled by their religion to somehow find a way to rationalize all USAID spending as fraud, abuse, corruption, stupid wokeism... whatever works, as long as they are still able to say that Musk is doing the "right things" so illegal is fine.

wolfie001

(7,667 posts)
10. They all vote republican anyways
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:14 PM
Feb 2025
At least 85% of 'em. Hope it hurts 'em a lot 'til those idiots come to their senses. Losers.

Response to cbabe (Original post)

Prairie Gates

(8,156 posts)
13. These farmers have an imaginary understanding of their real situation
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:21 PM
Feb 2025

They think they are self-sufficient, self-reliant individualists. Scrappy entrepreneurs on the market. They work hard and thrive, and nobody can ever say they took a dime from anyone!

In fact, they vastly overproduce a perishable good. Every year, the government, funded largely by Joe and Jane Urban Dweller, steps in to soak up their ridiculous surplus, largely because we DO need them to produce some of what they do, but they could not eke out a living on that amount of market-needed wheat. The government could, of course, merely throw the surplus we buy from them into the ocean, but at some point, somebody had the wise and kind idea of simply giving it to people around the world who could not afford to buy it and were otherwise in need of food. The result for the government (that's me an you, Jane and Joe Urban Dweller) is good: we get to have wheat at the amounts we actually need, while these farmers get to keep their farms, despite overproducing beyond anything even faintly needed in a competitive market. The added bonus is that the people we give the food to might like us a bit more and not fly airplanes into our buildings, or side in a war with our enemies.

Those are the real, market-driven, realpolitik conditions and relations of production for America's wheat farmers. Their entire image of themselves as competititve, self-reliant individuals is the opposite of their real relations of production. We used to call that ideology when we were allowed to think in those ways.

cbabe

(6,648 posts)
14. Agribusinesses took over years ago. Small
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:27 PM
Feb 2025

family farms are a myth.

When are agri corps going to push back against funding cuts?

ITAL

(1,323 posts)
22. That's not completely true
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:39 PM
Feb 2025

Admittedly I thought it was before I got married too. But my wife's extended family is made up several rural farmers in central PA. None of her uncles has more than a couple hundred acres (my wife's dad isn't a farmer himself, but rents most of acreage to his in-laws to farm) and I don't think any of them does BIG business. They all seem to get by okay I guess but I know some of the recent years have produce poor yields and they worry about the future.

yardwork

(69,364 posts)
17. You left out one aspect.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:33 PM
Feb 2025

The farming industry creates huge demand for pesticides, herbicides, and genetically modified crops just so that they can continue producing huge surpluses.

Those chemicals are in our bodies and those herbicide-resistant crops mean that all the wildflowers (weeds to Republicans) are gone, and so are the butterflies and birds that eat them.

I would hope for a silver lining that RFK Jr. might do something about that but I know he won't. He won't do one decent thing.

Nasruddin

(1,258 posts)
30. It's not 100%
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:18 PM
Feb 2025

But if you're in a farming community, everything is organized and run by a combine of agribusiness, pesticide/herbicide vendors, county ag, and buyers. Even the land taxes are based on an expectation of how much the land will yield in the typical crop.
Nobody is going to throw you in prison or even ostracize you from church social if you grow a strange crop or do something
different ... but no support, no infrastructure, no local help, no county ag support nothing.

Farms run on debt too - sometimes because of purchase, but often just to get sufficient cash flow to plan, prepare, sow, manage, and harvest til pay day. So if you want to get along, you have to go along.

yardwork

(69,364 posts)
15. I saw smug people wearing "Farmers for Trump" shirts last fall.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:29 PM
Feb 2025

They didn't look poor. They looked smug and mean.

I'll be mean right back. I hope they're losing sleep now.

What will happen is they'll lose those farms, and China will buy them.

sakabatou

(46,148 posts)
21. They mean threatened even MORE
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:38 PM
Feb 2025

They're losing workers, or workers are unwilling to come due to possible ICE raids.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
24. Mango Mussolini is also harming farmers in California's Central Valley by dumping billions of gallons of water...
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 03:54 PM
Feb 2025

In his mad grandiosity he’s got the Army Corps of Engineers “turning on the tap” and draining away what farmers were saving up for the dry, dry growing season.

In his fantasy-world this will go straight to SoCal to fight fires. In real life there are rugged mountains in the way.

You know, Farmers of US Agribusiness, you could help us all by uniting and making an almighty stink about Mad King Donald.

NBachers

(19,438 posts)
28. They're too busy putting signs and billboards up and down I-5 hating Newsom and Pelosi over "water freedom"
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:13 PM
Feb 2025

Or whatever the hell their hate – reason is these days.

GoodRaisin

(10,922 posts)
25. When the farmer starts screaming he'll give them subsidies.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:01 PM
Feb 2025

Stupid Dick Tater government.

SharonClark

(10,497 posts)
35. Yep, Senators chuckles grassley
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 05:04 PM
Feb 2025

and joanie ernest will carve our exemptions for their rural constituents.

Vogon_Glory

(10,297 posts)
26. Gosh-a-rooney, the consequences of gutting the USAID must be a Big Deal!
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:09 PM
Feb 2025

The Trump-fawning, both-sides Washington Post has been forced to take notice!

Chakaconcarne

(2,787 posts)
27. They'll just say we should be keeping our food here in the states instead of shipping it out of country.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:09 PM
Feb 2025

Aristus

(72,187 posts)
33. I wonder what they would say if we actually did keep our agricultural surplus here,
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 04:27 PM
Feb 2025

and the market price of that produce cratered? Even the Trumpanzees would have to know that that would not be a good thing.

eppur_se_muova

(41,942 posts)
36. "but it turns out he could actually be mistaken" ... YA THINK ??
Fri Feb 7, 2025, 01:01 PM
Feb 2025

I'm willing to concede this might actually have been meant to be snarky. Would probably pass straight under the radar with Uglicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's USAID gambit back...