Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
2. I mean if they want to take the Constitution literally
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:36 PM
Dec 2012

they should trade their guns for muskets or bayonets

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
3. While I can certianly see a certain 'originalist' catch 22 there, what about the same restrictions
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:39 PM
Dec 2012

as to freedom of speech? No email when the constitution was written, or TV, or radio, or the internet. Not sure I want a line in the sand that says our civil rights are only for the tech that existed in 1789.

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
6. Ok - I thought you were talking about an actual legal approach to the problem, rather than just
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:53 PM
Dec 2012

a rant. The problem is that the courts generally do not have different levels of scrutiny for different amendments to the constitution. Basically what I am saying is that if you were to propose that the 2nd amendment only protects the ownership of weapons that existed at the time that the amendment was ratified, the same limitations would apply to other civil rights. Thus, since the internet did not exist at the time of the 1st amendment, it should not be protected. I think everyone knows that this will be played out in the courts so legal principles matter.

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
5. Either talk about ALL rights or admit you just want to abolish one right among many
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:47 PM
Dec 2012

that pre-existed our Constitution and does not depend upon words on paper.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
8. No cartridge weapons.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:32 PM
Dec 2012

Hard to have any kind of repeater when you have to take the rifle, put in powder, wadding, and bullet to reload.

Muzzle-loaders.

Then again, they did have people to load rifles so that you could aim, shoot, and reach for the next loaded weapon.

But they weren't muskets. The American Revolution was won with rifles.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When Constitution was wri...