Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"I can think of no precedent in American history of such enormous power being entrusted to a private citizen"
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/18/opinion/musk-trump-doge-tech.htmlElon Musk Is Leading a Hostile Takeover of the Federal Government
Feb. 18, 2025, 5:02 a.m. ET
By Thomas B. Edsall
In an unparalleled delegation of executive branch authority, Trump has chosen Musk who is at once an entrepreneur whose companies have won billions of dollars in federal contracts and an open supporter of far-right political parties in Europe to conduct a radical reconfiguration of the American government in conformity with the ideological agendas of both Trump and Musk.
The elevation of Musk marks a major reversal of Trump ideology from the angry working class, anti-elitism of his first winning campaign, in 2016, under the guidance of Steve Bannon, to the explicit privileging, this time around, of elite tech oligarchs rich beyond the imagination of ordinary people to guide government policies.
It is no easy task to grasp the scale and magnitude of Trumps appointment of Musk to run the Department of Government Efficiency, better known by its acronym, DOGE. Musks declared goal is to cut federal spending by $2 trillion. According to the Congressional Budget Office, government expenditures totaled $6.75 trillion in 2024.
I can think of no precedent in American history of such enormous power being entrusted to a private citizen, Laurence Tribe, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard, wrote by email in reply to my inquiry:
To say that this delegation of unsupervised authority by President Trump to Elon Musk is an unprecedented violation of the Appointments Clause of Article II of the Constitution, which at a minimum would demand the Senates advice and consent to the appointment of anyone exercising the kind of power, would be an understatement.
Our Constitution rebels against the idea of empowering any individual, neither elected nor officially appointed pursuant to law, with the sweeping power to control the expenditure of public funds, the hiring and firing of public officials, the deployment of public force, and the organization of public agencies. This is brute dictatorship of the worst kind.
...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I can think of no precedent in American history of such enormous power being entrusted to a private citizen" (Original Post)
dalton99a
Feb 2025
OP
One or the other of them would be bad enough, but two of them in tandem? This needs to end yesterday!
Blues Heron
Feb 2025
#4
MTG and the rest of the gang have been telling us how Congress has the power of the purse
Walleye
Feb 2025
#2
Blues Heron
(8,793 posts)1. Musk is a highly evil person.
dalton99a
(94,087 posts)3. +1. Utterly, innately evil
just like his puppet Donald Trump
Blues Heron
(8,793 posts)4. One or the other of them would be bad enough, but two of them in tandem? This needs to end yesterday!
dalton99a
(94,087 posts)5. It is a perfectly synergistic combination for America's destruction.
Walleye
(44,719 posts)2. MTG and the rest of the gang have been telling us how Congress has the power of the purse
Looks like they have decided to abdicate their responsibility. We need to step in and take over somehow I cant believe they wouldnt defend their own institutions power but they wont.
dalton99a
(94,087 posts)6. Republicans are 100% complicit.
Walleye
(44,719 posts)7. Yep, can't stay in that toxic party and then shirk responsibility for the results
We should really start working on a few vulnerable Republicans and try and get them to leave the party. Whatever it takes wine and dine, threats whatever
kentuck
(115,397 posts)8. Absolutely!
But they want to stand back as if they have nothing to do with it when they have everything to do with it. It is their job to control the purse strings of this government, not a single individual. They have abdicated their duties and their oath.
peacebuzzard
(5,866 posts)9. Alarming that he doesn't qualify to pass a security clearance At All.
No telling what conflict of interests and dubious actors are in this creeps file.
on edit: oh geez I forgot No one (at least 51% ) cares )