Emil Bove has accused others of ethical lapses and misconduct. But he has had his own issues.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

Three new complaints to the New York bar recall prior challenges regarding Bove’s own conduct and potential conflicts of interest.

Emil Bove has accused others of ethical lapses and misconduct. But he has had his own issues. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

— News Hub - A Home for Better News (@thenewshub.bsky.social) 2025-02-25T15:57:51.552Z

Link to tweet

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/emil-bove-trump-sassoon-adams-ethics-rcna193024

Bove has hardly backed off his criticism of the prosecutors involved in the Adams case, from start to finish. In fact, at a Feb. 19 court hearing, he told U.S. District Judge Dale Ho that he believes the very existence of the Adams case “reflects, at minimum, appearances of impropriety that give cause for concern about abuse of the criminal justice process.”

But as Bove has impugned the conduct of those federal prosecutors, at least three complaints about him have been submitted to the relevant New York state body responsible for attorney discipline. In a Feb. 19 letter, the nonprofit organization American Oversight requested an immediate investigation into whether Bove violated New York attorney conduct rules when handling the Adams case, including alleged attempts of his “to induce other lawyers to engage in unethical behavior.” Two days later, the Campaign for Accountability submitted a similar complaint not only to New York state, but also to the chief judge of the Southern District (SDNY), alleging that Bove’s conduct in connection with the Adams case may have violated at least six different ethical rules. A third complaint, by a Democratic member of the New York State Senate, was submitted to the state disciplinary committee that day as well.

Moreover, the Adams affair is hardly the first time Bove’s conduct as a lawyer has been questioned. (The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Bove’s behalf.)

First, there was the email sent by a group of defense lawyers to SDNY leaders when Bove was under consideration for a promotion around 2018. According to Politico, the attorneys alleged that Bove had “deployed questionable tactics, including threatening defendants with increasingly severe charges the lawyers believed he couldn’t prove.” Bove did not receive the promotion at the time.

Next came the case he supervised after he was promoted roughly a year later to be co-chief of what is now known as the National Security and International Narcotics Unit. In that role, Bove oversaw a matter in which SDNY prosecutors not only repeatedly failed to disclose exculpatory evidence but also, according to the judge overseeing the case, “minimized and obfuscated when pressed for an explanation.” After dismissing the case because of “severe” errors, the judge ordered prosecutors to submit sworn declarations detailing their involvement in the disclosure saga.

[Irish_Dem]

1. The attorney for a crime syndicate is never as pure as the driven snow.