HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Chained CPI Imposes Painf...

Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:01 AM

Chained CPI Imposes Painful Social Security Benefit Cuts and a Benefit Bump-Up Provides Only Limited

he National Women’s Law Center has released a new report, “Chained CPI Imposes Painful Social Security Benefit Cuts and a Benefit Bump-Up Provides Only Limited Relief,” available here: http://www.nwlc.org/resource/chained-cpi-imposes-painful-social-security-benefit-cuts-and-benefit-bump-provides-only-lim. It analyzes how effective the “20-year benefit bump-up” proposed in the Bowles-Simpson report would be in protecting vulnerable beneficiaries from the impact of switching to the chained CPI. (NWLC’s other materials and infographics about the chained CPI are available here: http://www.nwlc.org/chained-cpi-what-it-and-what-it-means-women.)

NWLC’s new analysis finds that for the typical single elderly woman – a woman whose initial benefit is $1,100 per month, the median benefit for single women 65 and older:

• The cut from the chained CPI would reduce her monthly benefits by an amount equal to the cost of one week’s worth of food each month at age 80. She would still have two years to wait before receiving any help from the bump-up.

• The Bowles-Simpson bump-up would restore her monthly benefits to current-law levels for only two years – and then her benefits would fall behind again.

• By age 95, the cut in her benefits would equal the cost of three days’ worth of food each month.

The report also explains that the bump-up would provide no relief to most of the poorest elders who rely on Supplemental Security Income (SSI). SSI beneficiaries would get a double hit from the chained CPI, because it is used to adjust both the initial benefit level and subsequent benefits. But every additional $1 in Social Security benefits reduces SSI benefits by $1 – so a small increase from the bump-up would provide no additional income to most SSI beneficiaries. And some SSI beneficiaries could be even worse off, if the bump-up in their Social Security benefits pushed them slightly above the SSI eligibility threshold – and they lost automatic Medicaid eligibility.

People disabled at an early age also would be severely impacted by the chained CPI. The Bowles-Simpson 20-year bump-up would apply to recipients of disability benefits, starting 20 years after the disability determination. But some proposals for a “birthday bump-up,” such as the proposal in the Rivlin-Domenici deficit reduction plan, would provide no help to recipients of disability benefits.

Joan Entmacher
Vice President for Family Economic Security

3 replies, 1153 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Chained CPI Imposes Painful Social Security Benefit Cuts and a Benefit Bump-Up Provides Only Limited (Original post)
eridani Dec 2012 OP
eridani Dec 2012 #1
duffyduff Dec 2012 #2
TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #3

Response to eridani (Original post)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:23 AM

1. Obama has just offered to impose the pro-poverty chained CPI. Contact the White House ASAP!

This is unconscionable! Social Security does NOT contribute to the deficit!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-boehner-meet-as-debt-talks-intensify/2012/12/17/6b43c24a-4868-11e2-b6f0-e851e741d196_story.html

In pursuit of a compromise, President Obama has offered to slow the growth of Social Security benefits and lowered his demand for new taxes, according to a person familiar with the talks.

But Obama's counteroffer to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) seeks additional stimulus spending and a two-year extension of the federal debt limit, which Republicans have so far opposed.

Read more at:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:27 AM

2. I hope the Democrats shoot this insanity down

 

No way should "austerity" be forced on those who didn't create the economic mess in the first place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:29 AM

3. Evil bullshit, these folks are fucked enough under the current "overly generous" calculation

and one day it will be most of us no matter how carefully laid your sandcastles may be, look at the reality not your own little personal exceptionalism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread