Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,401 posts)
Tue Mar 4, 2025, 12:10 PM Mar 2025

[Oklahoma] Despite physician opposition, lawmakers OK bill allowing denial of care for 'moral' reasons

OKLAHOMA CITY — Amid concerns that it could harm patients, lawmakers narrowly advanced a bill that would allow health care providers to refuse to offer specific procedures or care based on moral, religious or conscientious beliefs.

House Bill 1224, authored by Rep. Kevin West, R-Moore, moved through the Health and Human Services Oversight Committee Monday with a 7-6 vote with bipartisan opposition.

Around 30 health care providers from around the state gathered at the Capitol and filled the committee meeting to advocate against the bill. They said they were disappointed by the outcome of the vote.

The legislation, which West said has been successful in a handful of states, could allow a physician, or an entire hospital, to choose not to offer procedures that conflict with personal beliefs. This excludes emergency care, although the bill does not define the parameters that create that situation.

No specific procedures or types of care are outlined in the bill, meaning a health care provider, institution or payor could choose to stop offering STD testing, blood transfusions or elective procedures.

https://oklahomavoice.com/2025/03/03/despite-physician-opposition-lawmakers-ok-bill-allowing-denial-of-care-for-moral-reasons/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
[Oklahoma] Despite physician opposition, lawmakers OK bill allowing denial of care for 'moral' reasons (Original Post) In It to Win It Mar 2025 OP
I'm opposed to treating conservatives. Solly Mack Mar 2025 #1
This is aimed at pregnant women, of course. Can't imagine it affecting hetero males, unless Timeflyer Mar 2025 #2
How can this ever be considered SupernaturalMama Mar 2025 #3
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #5
Their morals are fucked up if they pass this...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2025 #4
This can and will affect the LGBT community too. Behind the Aegis Mar 2025 #6

Timeflyer

(3,704 posts)
2. This is aimed at pregnant women, of course. Can't imagine it affecting hetero males, unless
Tue Mar 4, 2025, 12:29 PM
Mar 2025

they look like good (white) breeding stock and want a vasectomy.

3. How can this ever be considered
Tue Mar 4, 2025, 04:36 PM
Mar 2025

Absolutely ridiculous that they're removing EVERYTHING that women had fought for and finally had a modicum of control over their lives. But Hospitals should NEVER be allowed to refuse due to religious beliefs and as for physicians they took an oath and I can not remember ever reading in that oath "unless it interferes with my beliefs"
This is really getting out of control. I am positive that RBG is rolling over in her grave and screaming wtf after a lifetime securing certain rights and protecting them blown apart in such a short time! It's a disgrace pure and simple.

Behind the Aegis

(55,950 posts)
6. This can and will affect the LGBT community too.
Thu Mar 6, 2025, 12:08 AM
Mar 2025

Though many won't see that, and even fewer will care. Such is life.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»[Oklahoma] Despite physic...