Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

(39,368 posts)
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:36 PM Feb 2021

Re. witnesses, Raskin said McConnell's statement shows they wouldn't have made a difference

Since McConnell had decided the case on jurisdictional grounds (the January exception), Raskin said we could have produced thousands of witnesses and it wouldn’t have had an impact on his vote to acquit.

He seemed as at peace with the outcome as one could expect. I hope I’m right about that because he left it all on the field as did the whole impeachment team.

Also, if Raskin is reading this correctly, as I’m sure he is. Trump and his defense team made a huge unforced error by insulting the intelligence of the rioters, many of whom are already feeling left high-and-dry by him:



Getting back to the jurisdictional issue, if the facts of the case were basically irrelevant, why burn a bridge to score a dubious evidentiary point? The constitutional vote on Tuesday should have told Team Trump they didn’t need to go there.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re. witnesses, Raskin said McConnell's statement shows they wouldn't have made a difference (Original Post) BeyondGeography Feb 2021 OP
It was not about trying to get 67 votes. It was about embarrassing Republicans. servermsh Feb 2021 #1
Lol, republicans are incapable of shame.. Callado119 Feb 2021 #3
The Senators can hear voters, if there is enough time and noise. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #4
They have no interest in governing central scrutinizer Feb 2021 #5
The Cult Members Are Forever Loyal sfstaxprep Feb 2021 #2

servermsh

(913 posts)
1. It was not about trying to get 67 votes. It was about embarrassing Republicans.
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:41 PM
Feb 2021

Just spend ONE second thinking about how this would have been run if the parties were reversed!

Go ahead! Do it!

Everyone knows Republicans would have HAPPILY run an impeachment committee for MONTHS, bringing out one embarrassing witness after another. They would have coordinated their message for MONTHS! They did it with the fake Benghazi!

Callado119

(171 posts)
3. Lol, republicans are incapable of shame..
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:50 PM
Feb 2021

You really wanted a months long trial derailing Biden’s agenda that would still end in acquittal just for some ridiculous goal of “embarrassing” republicans?

central scrutinizer

(11,646 posts)
5. They have no interest in governing
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 07:06 PM
Feb 2021

Or doing anything constructive but protracted hearings and innuendo and smearing make them wet.

sfstaxprep

(9,998 posts)
2. The Cult Members Are Forever Loyal
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:41 PM
Feb 2021

They will gladly go to prison for him, if they must.

He didn't throw them under the bus. He invited them to go there, and they went willingly, and would again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re. witnesses, Raskin sai...