General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums⚠️ Schumer to vote YES for cloture

@leahmcelrath.bsky.social
⚠️ Schumer to vote YES for cloture
Jake Sherman
@JakeSherman
And there it is.
Schumer will vote for cloture. Needs 6 more Dems to follow him. Fetterman said he will already.Andrew Desiderio @ @Andre... 3m
NEWS - Schumer told Dems during closed-door lunch that he would vote for cloture tomorrow morning.
Schumer is speaking on the floor short...
4:47 PM 3/13/25 4.5K Views
March 13, 2025 at 5:51 PM
â ï¸ Schumer to vote YES for cloture
— Leah McElrath (@leahmcelrath.bsky.social) 2025-03-13T21:51:47.406Z
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,172 posts)hlthe2b
(112,635 posts)but your "lol" seems a bit like laughing at our own pending destruction.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,172 posts)617Blue
(2,187 posts)Bayard
(28,369 posts)I thought he was better than this. Who else is going to cave?
617Blue
(2,187 posts)Demoralizing their own people to coddle to MAGA.
Dave says
(5,312 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(6,664 posts)on the Iran nuclear deal tells you everything you need to know about Schumer.
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Bayard This message was self-deleted by its author.
JMCKUSICK
(4,954 posts)People who go with the wind. Less than 24;hours ago, we got word that he had the votes to stop it.
I'm tired of feeling conned.
MustLoveBeagles
(14,552 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(4,826 posts)We have no one on our side.
senseandsensibility
(24,205 posts)I hope this proves it.
Ace Rothstein
(3,369 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,492 posts)we cede our power to block it so Rs can pass it with 51 votes and we Dems can say we let them pass this horrible bill so they can keep the government open and let them continue to ignore the the 3 branches of government in order to keep destroying the government we are voting to keep open. SMART.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,664 posts)Mme. Defarge
(8,882 posts)who got rid of Al Franken?
dgauss
(1,482 posts)Just ran across this in another post:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220134301
I don't know much about about Gillibrand or the Alfalfa Club but this did kind of stick out. Maybe Gillibrand was doing some "hobnobbing."
The Alfalfa Club had been around since 1913 and existed solely to host a yearly banquet where the most important people in government could hobnob with the most important people in business. Membership was limited to around 200, and the Alfalfas admitted new sprouts only when existing members died. That evening, Supreme Court justice Elena Kagan and Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman joined the likes of Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and US senator Kirsten Gillibrand as members. Musk was attending as a guest.
steelyboo
(791 posts)Still remember the early '90s and the debate about these corporate bootlickers run the Democratic Party. We got 2 Republican-lite presidents with great economies out of it. Only cost us our soul and future.
617Blue
(2,187 posts)FHRRK
(1,354 posts)As a CA resident I often got pissed at Feinstein for her actions. We are already fighting at a disadvantage, dont need Dems in solid blue States to be weak.
With that NY already has one proven solid option in AOC as a replacement.
senseandsensibility
(24,205 posts)Makes their cowardice even worse.
CentralMass
(16,839 posts)Which it is extremely important to fill the seats with proven Democrats. Cant risk another Fetterman scam.
SSJVegeta
(2,240 posts)demmiblue
(39,164 posts)Don't take this as gospel. It's not official. It's a very knowledgable source's best understanding of the situation. This persons likely Yeses on cloture are. Schumer, Hassan, Peters, Durbin, Schatz, King, Shaheen, Fetterman, Cortez Masto and Gillibrand.
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) 2025-03-13T20:51:37.640Z
SSJVegeta
(2,240 posts)alarimer
(17,146 posts)Utterly spineless
Javaman
(65,055 posts)At a crowd much like chamberlain
spanone
(140,922 posts)Deuxcents
(25,363 posts)Captain Zero
(8,713 posts)That envelope is going back EMPTY to the attention of these quislings if they vote with Republicans to throw us to the wolves.
Not another penny.
JoseBalow
(9,091 posts)and a note that says "you suck"
mountain grammy
(28,627 posts)I got at least a dozen.. I'm a donor, but not to this.. completely demoralizing.
Meowmee
(9,212 posts)I knew I was wasting my time emailing them. Have voted for both of them for years and there was no other choice. I guess I cant even remember now. I dont know why I voted for this party for over 40 years. They never did anything that helped me and now they screwed me over a big time and are apparently going to ruin the country by not fighting R strongly.
I give up at this point. I always knew that they were the better alternative for everybody. I didnt have to be coddled or made excited to vote for somebody. I always voted for whoever the candidate is its the other voters that really suck. Narcissistic idiots have destroyed this country for good. FU to all of you.
617Blue
(2,187 posts)RJ-MacReady
(603 posts)I am seriously going to consider leaving the party.
617Blue
(2,187 posts)regnaD kciN
(27,429 posts)Captain Zero
(8,713 posts)Schumer needs to resign his leadership post.
Lovie777
(21,582 posts)questionseverything
(11,529 posts)After cloture the repubs dont need democratic votes
With holding cloture was the only chance to stop them
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)Last year. Even many Senate Democrats were on record for ending it. Remember how it was portrayed as an undemocratic relic of Jim Crow?
For some reason now we are supposed to support the filibuster?
questionseverything
(11,529 posts)Descent into madness
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)found respect for Senator Manchin and Senator Sinema is sure to follow .......
manicdem
(534 posts)Fillerbuster good, fillerbuster bad, fillerbuster good, fillerbuster bad...
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)position here on DU.
Passages
(3,986 posts)Jon Ace
(255 posts)What has happened to this party?
alarimer
(17,146 posts)He's useless.
Renew Deal
(84,650 posts)Hopefully he chooses to not run for re-election.
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
sakabatou This message was self-deleted by its author.
Dave says
(5,312 posts)The Repubs have 53 Senators.
sakabatou
(45,720 posts)LonePirate
(14,328 posts)Cloture passes and then the House CR passes because now it only needs 50 votes instead of 60 votes. Schumer and crew are guaranteeing it passes even though they had the power to prevent it from happening.
To say I am ashamed to be a Democrat today is a massive understatement.
Response to sakabatou (Reply #34)
LonePirate This message was self-deleted by its author.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)is a simple majority, which the rethugs have.
awesomerwb1
(4,960 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,200 posts)I have a very low opinion of most senate Democrats, especially Schumer. Unfortunately, I am forced to leave it at that.
617Blue
(2,187 posts)It reeks of incompetence and lack of control. Clown.
BannonsLiver
(20,200 posts)I gave up on him after he publicly cried over something Trump did in his first term. I'm not opposed to men crying. Not at all. But you NEVER EVER give the enemy the satisfaction of seeing that. The satisfaction of knowing they got to you.
sprinkleeninow
(22,052 posts)and means squat then? Along with a multitude of others messaging to allow the shutdown to happen?
Thanx for nothing...
DSandra
(1,696 posts)Are TIRED of the Dems lacking spine!
Javaman
(65,055 posts)Im very close to bing done with everything.
repukes that lie and Dems that dont fight
The old saying of the road to hell is paved with good intentions, we are now entering hell but there never any good intentions, just one bad move by the Dems after another
We all deserve all the misery we get.
We elected weaklings and we expected lions.
DSandra
(1,696 posts)kacekwl
(8,851 posts)God damn it I'm so sick of being jerked around. Is it a fucking yes or is it a no ? Knock this shit off.
617Blue
(2,187 posts)Attilatheblond
(8,149 posts)From now on, I send the letters.
usonian
(23,314 posts)And I unload. No action, no money.
And more, that I conveniently forgot.
senseandsensibility
(24,205 posts)a head fake?
Renew Deal
(84,650 posts)It wouldn't make a difference and one less vote for the republican agenda.
ImNotGod
(1,194 posts)SamKnause
(14,659 posts)We vote them in.
They don't fight for us.
They vote against our best interest.
How the fuck can any of this shit be stopped ???
LonePirate
(14,328 posts)Our leaders in Congress are content to give Republicans everything they want.
I feel for the interns managing the phones and email messages in Schumers office as they are going to be on the receiving end of hell.
pinkstarburst
(1,870 posts)We look weak. We are weak. Only AOC, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Jasmine Crockett are actually taking the fight to the streets. Newsom is courting votes on the right (newsflash: they are not going to vote for us! Repubs turn out and they consistently vote for their guy!) and we are doing a weak ass job of firing up our side. Wish we could get Schumer out of there and get a fighter like Elizabeth Warren as minority leader.
Mossfern
(4,599 posts)Why?
Why?
Why?
I want an explanation!
They are ceding the government to a mad man and his lackey - you choose which is which.
pinkstarburst
(1,870 posts)to the democratic party. Not one more cent. Not for 2026 races. Not for 2028. Nothing. Not one cent of my money.
All we can do is wear pink and hold up paddles? This is why we are getting defeated. We are weak. We are spineless. They are going to cut medicaid and Schumer is going to make it happen. Can we get someone leading us in the senate other than Schumer? I'm thinking Warren would be a good choice. She doesn't roll over to oligarchs.
Docreed2003
(18,708 posts)Normal "give and take", normal "compromise", normal "order"...NORMAL DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST ANYMORE.
That ship sailed a helluva long time ago. I've said here before whenever folks ask "how did we get here" that the GOP has played the long game, they decided power was better than compromise decades ago, and they sacrificed everything this country was supposed to stand on to attain that goal. When a whole generation of GOP leaders have been trained up to believe that not only is their worldview "Christian" that the Democratic perspective is Satanic, you can't compromise with that mentality, no matter how hard you might try. The weak assed attempts to "restore normal" when our side has gained political leverage has only served to weaken us further.
We are living through an authoritarian takeover decades in the making. Compromise will only further their goals.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)It means they will vote not to filibuster and allow a vote to proceed on the actual CR.
So unless 4 Republicans join Democrats to vote no it will pass.
Voting no on cloture would block it unless enough Democrats vote yes to clear a 60 vote threshold. Unless Republicans change the rule to eliminate the filibuster for legislative things like this.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Lovie777
(21,582 posts)GQP will still need 60 to pass the actual bill.
ibegurpard
(17,073 posts)That is what cloture is. Allowing the issue to move forward to an actual vote.
The filibuster is another way think of cloture. If you voted for cloture you are voting to give up the 60 vote threshold on that issue.
LonePirate
(14,328 posts)All bills essentially have an infinite amount of debate time in the Senate. Thus the Senate uses cloture to end debate on a bill and bring it up for a vote. 60 votes are currently needed to pass a cloture motion. Once cloture passes and debate in a bill ends, they can proceed to vote on the bill. The final vote on a bill only requires a majority (or a 50-50 tie plus the VP) to pass. Repubs have 53 votes so their bill will pass. Dems could only stop the bill by refusing to pass the cloture resolution.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)LonePirate
(14,328 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Because this is what I thought the Democrats were going to do:
""I think we're going to all be 'no' on cloture unless we get an agreement to propose at least this 30-day clean [continuing resolution] amendment and maybe a couple of others," Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia told reporters Thursday morning. "So we'll be 'no' on cloture unless we get an agreement to do that. I'm not aware of whether the Republicans have agreed to that yet, but we'll be 'no' on cloture if we don't get it, and I think that's a unified position.""
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-2025-senate-democrats-vote/
There are posts implying that the cloture is on the original CR, not a temporary one.
Can someone correct my confusion please.
Thanks in advance.
ibegurpard
(17,073 posts)If they voted yes for cloture they lose their 60 vote leverage.
If they vote yes for cloture with the condition of BEING ABLE to vote for a clean resolution they lose their leverage in exchange for a vote that won't pass. Unless 4 repukes magically decide to vote for a clean resolution.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,492 posts)the bill is on the floor a simple majority passes it.
So basically Dems are saying this is a horrible bill but we will let them pass Republicans pass it anyway. Then they pat themselves on the back and say we didnt vote for the bill we just let the Rs pass it and Ds say we kept the government open even though it meant Rs can continue to rape and pillage it.
If they didnt vote Yes on cloture the bill would not come to the floor. Then they pat government t might shut down and ads are too scared of their own tails to defend a vote that is completely defendable with the right messaging.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,492 posts)Power to stop it.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)or would not care if the government shut down?
Then what?
Nanjeanne
(6,492 posts)I think to not fall into R talking points.
Also one part of the bill basically guts DC because it would essentially treat DC as a federal agency, forcing the city to revert to its 2024 fiscal year budget. DC officials say this would force the city to make $1.1 billion in cuts to services in a six-month period. DC government leaders say it would include cuts to DC Police, Fire and EMS, 911 Services, Metro and DC Public Schools. Thats not a good look for Dems but no one is really paying attention to this piece.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)are the ones who will suffer.
HereForTheParty
(915 posts)SnoopDog
(2,695 posts)How else can you interpret that?
bob4460
(374 posts)Make sure that this will be his legacy, and he will never be able to be elected again.
Scrivener7
(58,156 posts)electric_blue68
(25,630 posts)Just back the past few days, catching up .
I think (dealing with sleep schedule problems), I was able to leave a message .
JBTaurus83
(847 posts)To specific candidates and causes. The leadership coming out of the senate is a sad joke.
JT45242
(3,814 posts)Spineless and worthless are the only words that come to mind.
demmiblue
(39,164 posts)@sahilkapur.bsky.social
SCHUMER just now: "While the CR bill is very bad, the potential for a shutdown has consequences for America that are much, much worse."
March 13, 2025 at 6:32 PM
SCHUMER just now: "While the CR bill is very bad, the potential for a shutdown has consequences for America that are much, much worse."
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur.bsky.social) 2025-03-13T22:32:48.307Z
Efilroft Sul
(4,291 posts)Liberal In Texas
(15,944 posts)doc03
(38,787 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,939 posts)going to get p censured moderators?
sop
(17,291 posts)Thanks, Chuck.
WA-03 Democrat
(3,328 posts)All the pots meeting the kettle that joined him. I am beyond depressed
demmiblue
(39,164 posts)Josh Marshall @joshtpm.bsky.social·1d
Okay, Schumer's speech was a head fake. This is the Senate D caucus trying to fool their own supporters. Sorry to say that but that's what's happening.
2/ look long. But I don't think this is over. Additional pressure has a shot at upsetting this apple cart even now.
3/ There's a a byword for at TPM: fundamental honesty with readers. That means not only the obvious, don't lie to them. It also means don't hold back critical information. Certainly don't ever play them for fools. There has to be an analogous byword for elected officials. Your representatives ...
4/ don't have to and sometimes may be obligated not to do what you want. But they should never play their voters for fools. Schumer tried to play his voters for fools here. He tried to engineer a performative stand down. He wanted to keep his hands clean while still allowing the CR to pass.
5/ The events of the last 24 hours made that impossible. He had to put his cards on the table. Very very hard to ever forget that happened. As I said, there's still a chance the tide cld shift here again. I wonder how much the level of voter anger of this will register over the next 18 hours.
March 13, 2025 at 6:58 PM
5/ The events of the last 24 hours made that impossible. He had to put his cards on the table. Very very hard to ever forget that happened. As I said, there's still a chance the tide cld shift here again. I wonder how much the level of voter anger of this will register over the next 18 hours.
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) 2025-03-13T22:57:59.879Z
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)Marshall's head's on a swivel here. Yesterday was a head-fake so that Schumer could fuck with rank-and-filers so that something something but whatever, it sucks. However, "voter anger" may tilt Dem Senators back to what may be the correct path, or, accidentally, the incorrect path. Of course, "voter anger" is what led Schumer to announce, yesterday, that there were not enough YES votes, so that Schumer could double-fuck the rank-and-file so that tomorrow Dem Senators can unfuck them, but only once.
Well, I think that holds up quite well as well. Feel free to critique. It won't matter, BTW, but it may (or may not) clarify the matter once and for some.
ebbie15644
(1,244 posts)Our calls and tweets aren't working. Thought? What if we do a dem " blackout" no tweets sharing what they say. No $$$ donated, no watching their clips on social media and sharing etc?
ZRB
(465 posts)for a pointless show vote, without a single policy concession. This is an utter failure if it stands. I've been proud to defend some of our more centrist members for facing challenging political dynamics, but this is a no-brainer. The party will always have my vote, but this won't win anyone new into the fold. What a crushing joke.
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,357 posts)This CR is horrible and we should shut down the government
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)I think I remember Congress keeps getting paid no matter what, but we won't. But, I agree with Schiff that you have to say NO! to this dictatorship. We are heading to violence. Schumer will not do anthing but push us on to more desperate measures.
What's the difference between the People going on strike completely or the Government being turned off? Not much. We are not afraid!
I can't believe this is happening to my country. I want to cry, but I'm too tired.
Eff trump et al. Hell is making room for them all.
Scrivener7
(58,156 posts)We need to primary both of our Senators.
Scrivener7
(58,156 posts)Wiz Imp
(8,763 posts)I know people don't want to hear this, but it's not over until a vote actually takes place. First of all, we don't know for sure that 8 Democrats are planning to vote yes. Even assuming, the votes are there, minds may still be able to be changed. I think pressure worked on some Senators already - Kelly, Gallego, Warner & Hickenlooper were thought to be possible yes votes who have announced they will vote no. The following is the list I've seen of most likely yes votes. These people should be hammered hard until the vote tomorrow.
Schumer
Hassan
Peters
Durbin
Schatz
King
Shaheen
Fetterman
Cortez Masto
Gillibrand.
Ping Tung
(4,121 posts)Albert Camus
Smokster
(16 posts)Musk is a strange breed of right-wing anarchist bordering on anarcho-capitalist like Javier Milei. Letting him and his posse run wild during a protracted shutdown with right-wing authoritarians like Vought backing him is a real turbid brew. Add Trump and the Freedom Caucus to the mix and you get no constraint at all. Not even the illusion of it. If people are looking for acceleration of an already runaway train that's what the shutdown will do. This would be no "normal shutdown" by any stretch. Musk and his chainsaw gang want it bad. If people think they can still somehow slow down the runaway train going forward then Schumer is making the right play.
sheshe2
(95,588 posts)Welcome to DU.
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,357 posts)Morbius
(873 posts)Allowing a government shutdown right now is bad.
Both options, in fact, are spectacularly bad. Both options lead to government as we know it to come to an end. Shutting the government down would, in my opinion, accelerate the destruction. Allowing the CR to pass permits a slower chaos.
We're at the twilight of the great American experiment with democracy. Shutting down the government brings the darkness more quickly. Allowing the CR to pass gives us a little time to keep fighting. Even if that fight is doomed, I prefer the latter.
I know this is an unpopular opinion hereabouts right now. But I think we're at a "damned if we do, fucked if we don't" point for America. I think Schumer et al had no choice.
Buns_of_Fire
(18,982 posts)Wouldn't want to upset our good friends across the aisle.