General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm not happy that Gillibrand was an aye.
I'm going to let her know my feelings.
AkFemDem
(2,508 posts)That she was absolutely opposed to a budget shut down
Cirsium
(3,943 posts)That's not a position, it's an excuse.
Skittles
(171,716 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Emile
(42,289 posts)LoisB
(13,028 posts)I have a LONG memory, and I will NEVER believe her actions were anything other than self-serving.
LoisB
(13,028 posts)rzemanfl
(31,379 posts)MichMan
(17,151 posts)By the evening, at least 35 Democrats including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York were calling on him to quit, and Franken's office said the senator was planning an announcement from the Senate floor Thursday morning at 11:45. Some fellow Democrats said they believe he will announce he is resigning.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/democratic-women-senators-call-franken-resign-amid-sexual-misconduct-allegations-n827036
LoisB
(13,028 posts)hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)There is always someone who points out how many others went along. That's true, but they did not drum up the lynch mob. That was Gillibrand and she soaked up every chance to benefit herself in that debacle. And yes, Gillibrand did so before Harris-despite CNN's claim to the contrary as posted by Celerity.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)And Harris was the first to go on CNN. All Gillibrand did was make a Facebook post which was what others did at that point.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)but I have a close colleague who has known/once worked with Gillibrand ( "known forever" in their words) and was very aligned with her then- until she showed herself for what she is- a self-serving exploiter who sought and got every one of those interviews. You are totally misled.
That said, Harris and all the others who went for the "chum in the water" did not do themselves well, either.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Please provide links that prove what youre claiming. Otherwise its all just hearsay and unreliable.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)There were plenty of blogs articles way back then. As I said, I don't give a GD if you believe it or not. I honestly do not, but you are being strongly misled. Yes, the rest latched on and bear blame as well. But SHE was the ringleader.
GreenWave
(12,641 posts)Franken had to wait about 6 mos for the state Repugs to even let him take a seat. Then came the knife in the back.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)i wonder about the motives of those denying what happened and by whom.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)And that youre say is true. And Im not the one being misled. Gillibrand was a very junior Senator at the time and didnt have the power to force Senators like Warren, Sanders, Harris and Booker to do anything.
Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. If you have any proof of your accusations please present them.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Given it has been over a decade and DU archives only go back a year or so, you know the amount of archival research required to address your demands. A lot was written by responsible journalists on the issue-- but CNN is/has been all too happy to blame it all (credit?) Harris who was only one of the subsequent mob.
Given I don't give a damn what you believe or not--especially given how you addressed me earlier, then I will leave it at that, end my all-too-short break-- and go see patients. Have a good day and continue to be deceived if that makes you happy.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Its up to you to prove them. Celerity had no problem backing anything with links to credible sources for the same event.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Ok
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)I seriously doubt anyone else gives a damn which person you want to make excuses for--who was primarily instrumental in removing an invaluable voice for us in the US Senate.
We all lost-- thanks largely to her--and you defend it. Indefensible as hell.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)I just asked you to prove your accusations.Which you havent. And what was lost? A democrat resigned and was replaced by another democrat, Tina Smith, who has been a fine Senator.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)(and NOT in a good way).
I get it. You hate Al Franken. Well, despite his being replaced by a good Senator, his was a unique voice and we all lost because of attitudes/tactics like those of Gillibrand's. The RW was very happy, though, because he could uniquely get his (and our) points across in a way that totally humiliated the RW and reverberated for days.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Because none of of them prove your accusations or disputed what Celerity posted. Plus they were all several years after the fact while Celeritys links were real time as the events were unfolding.
And I dont hate Franken, but I dont see him as some god either. He was a good democratic Senator who was replaced by another good democratic senator.
OnDoutside
(20,868 posts)MichMan
(17,151 posts)Maybe she was just one of those who "went along" with Fetterman & Schumer on this vote.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Shes a junior Senator with little power, even less back then. Some act like she went to Frankens office with a resignation letter and a gun and told Franken either his signature or his brains would be on the letter before she left. 😉
Nixie
(17,984 posts)should have resigned over Monica Lewinsky, yet she took the Clintons help years prior and campaigned with Bill so she could get a leg up into Hillarys senate seat. Thats why shes looked at differently.
And before the Clintons are further bashed, it isnt loyalty to the Clintons that is the issue, its about her throwing them under the bus to jump on the MeToo bandwagon. So its the phoniness.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)Female Democratic senators coordinated a wave of calls for Franken's resignation
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/06/politics/senators-al-franken-resignation
Nearly three weeks after sexual harassment allegations first emerged against Sen. Al Franken, a wave of Democratic senators in coordination and following a flurry of text messages and phone calls called for his resignation in rapid succession Wednesday morning.
Starting around 11:30 a.m. ET, the senators posted statements in a coordinated effort, one after the other, on social media, saying the Minnesota Democrat should step down.
Some comments were elaborate, lengthy and loaded with a moral message. Others, like that of Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, were straight to the point. Al Franken should resign, she simply tweeted.
Within the next 90 minutes, 16 Democrats 10 of them women and one Republican senator Susan Collins of Maine had publicly urged their colleague to vacate his seat.
snip
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Polybius
(21,901 posts)https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/ghost-al-franken-mystery-gillibrand-campaign-s-failure-launch-n1023366
Celerity
(54,409 posts)her, including Harris on live telly. It was all coordinated in advance, as the article I posted with the video shows.
In the end, every single Dem Senator excerpt for 5 told Franken in public or private to resign. Schumer signed off on it all and of course called for Franken to resign.
Of the 5, only Manchin told him not to resign. Three (Coons, Schatz, Shaheen) couldn't say anything as they were on the the Senate Ethics Committee, and Menendez refused comment as he was under federal indictment and in his first corruption trial. He lost the second trial and now is going to prision for 11 years.
4 of the 5 would have very likely called for Franken to resign if they could have or if they (Menendez) were not in a federal corruption trial.
Polybius
(21,901 posts)Sorry, I misread.
Celerity
(54,409 posts)DiamondShark
(1,167 posts)Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)who all did the same thing on the same day including Sanders, Warren, Booker and Harris (who was the first to go on national tv calling for Franken to resign).
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)Elizabeth and Bernie
And as huge fans of those two, i was deeply disappointed ( pissed off) at their lack of backbone
LoisB
(13,028 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Seems unfair.
LoisB
(13,028 posts)DiamondShark
(1,167 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)But it really depends on why they jumped off the bridge. If a boat was sinking and they jumped to save people from drowning, Id say yes.
Nanuke
(925 posts)Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Many of us have a LONG memory...
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)There are no facts to back that up. Even according to Frankens own account of events it was Schumer who pushed him to resign.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)fuels the misogyny that surrounds the entire narrative of those events.
That is not to say I agree with her on this vote. I absolutely do not.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)Elected officials should be held accountable for their votes and actions. But I dont like unfair demonize of someone based on fiction.
I'm not comfortable how this thread became a discussion about former Senator Franken. My intent was to express my disappoint in today's vote.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)The Franken bots come out of the woodwork. Its been over 7 years now, they really need to let it go.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)"After Gillibrand became the first senator to publicly call for Franken to step down, setting off a wave of over two dozen other Democratic senators to also call for his resignation, many elite donors who had once supported her hesitated. Some said they viewed Gillibrands actions as opportunistic and self-serving, especially as the presidential election neared."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/ghost-al-franken-mystery-gillibrand-campaign-s-failure-launch-n1023366
"WASHINGTON (AP) Kirsten Gillibrand was the first Democratic senator to call for her colleague Al Frankens resignation in 2017 as he faced allegations of sexual misconduct, building a profile as a leading advocate for women that became the centerpiece of her 2020 presidential bid.
But the New York senator is taking a different approach when it comes to sexual harassment allegations hitting closer to home, those against her states Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo."
https://apnews.com/article/kirsten-gillibrand-andrew-cuomo-al-franken-resignation-a3735f0f78ed6a8949b34cbc82239023
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gillibrand-says-she-continues-to-have-no-regrets-about-leading-the-call-for-frankens-resignation/2019/07/23/2625385e-ad3f-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)She made a Facebook post which was followed minutes later by posts by other Senators. Thats a coordinated effort. Harris was still the first to appear on national television to call for Franken to resign. Harris also got Frankens seat on the Judiciary committee.
And people do have their own views, but it doesnt make it fact.
Quiet Em
(2,937 posts)I had to look it up because it's been awhile. But I remember reading this statement at the time.
https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/schumer-statement-calling-on-sen-franken-to-resign
Duncanpup
(15,651 posts)Here in Pennsylvania we have Mcormick and Fettermanchin.
Trueblue1968
(19,251 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)A rolling disappointment.
DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)primary her.
rubbersole
(11,223 posts)c-rational
(3,203 posts)kansasobama
(1,750 posts)Outside of Fetterman. She is chair of DSCC. We will get request for funding from her.
Good luck.
PatrickforB
(15,426 posts)ButchMcMuffin
(81 posts)"Have you gained weight?"