Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cheezoholic

(3,719 posts)
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:18 PM Mar 2025

So Schumer tried to explain it again tonight on Hayes. He is not good at communicating on a a laymen's level

If someone on this board can say I'm wrong in my interpretation here please do, but as of yet, in many of my replies on this nobody has.
Please, I welcome it. I'm no Schumer fan, never have been. But as much as my pea brain understands this he made the right decision because we're drowning and we only have a twig to hold onto.

The repukes were hoping the Dems would shut the government down. Proof was they had the Alien Enemies Act cued up that night. They were ready to declare a national emergency. They were/are ready to shut the courts down. People need to understand that out of the shit choices we had the shutdown removed the guardrail of the courts. These fuckers are itching, drooling for any damn reason they can to declare a national emergency nationwide due to the disfunction of congress or whatever reason they can get away with. If that happens the Executive takes control until congress can agree. THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN IF WE SHUT DOWN! A shutdown could very well have put the courts on the sidelines. That single thing was the deciding factor.

I have looked and looked and as far as I can find Schumer is absolutely correct on that. The shutdown could go on for at least 6 months if not longer. During that time the courts would be virtually knee capped, null.

Schumer's problem is he is short, condescending and a poor communicator. As much as he grates on my nerves (so much I've damn near been banned for attacking him before) he made the ONLY decision that keeps our head above water... for now.

I agree with calls for Schumer to step down as leader. I have been calling for the younger upcoming progressives to be allowed to step up. There is too much and too many corporate swinging Democrats running the show in the Senate for too long. Its time to shake and consolidate damn it!

Like I said if my reasoning here is wrong please explain why. Not gonna hurt my feelings and if I'm wrong I'm wrong.

Peace and Carrots

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So Schumer tried to explain it again tonight on Hayes. He is not good at communicating on a a laymen's level (Original Post) Cheezoholic Mar 2025 OP
I agree with you about Schumer's communication problem Raven123 Mar 2025 #1
Its not a strategy its the law. And yes, the courts have stepped in and yes, they may be taking their time but they are Cheezoholic Mar 2025 #4
How do you know choie Mar 2025 #12
Sure about that? Raven123 Mar 2025 #18
Schumer rso Mar 2025 #2
I disagree with pretty much gab13by13 Mar 2025 #3
So you are saying the courts are null and void as we speak? n/t Cheezoholic Mar 2025 #6
I'm saying we are in the midst of a constitutional crisis right now. gab13by13 Mar 2025 #14
Yes I'm tired of the "constitutional crisis" being looked at as some future event. BannonsLiver Mar 2025 #17
I was yelling at the tv. yellow dahlia Mar 2025 #5
Well stated keepthemhonestO Mar 2025 #7
If our strategy is to do what Schumer is doing and move to the right like Newsom, Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2025 #8
We have to do whatever we can to get to the midterms alive. There was no strategy here only 2 choices Cheezoholic Mar 2025 #9
Don't know if Schumer's vote was right or wrong. I did read today that telemedicine will continue because of CR. Silent Type Mar 2025 #10
It's interesting to me that often leaders in the House and Senate aren't better communicators EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #11
All those people also all have one thing in common newdeal2 Mar 2025 #16
I agree that's what the thing at rhe DOJ was obamanut2012 Mar 2025 #13
Schumer was/is going on a book tour at this time in our history?? Trust_Reality Mar 2025 #15
Not a penny until he's out of leadership. Why won't he face voters? 617Blue Mar 2025 #19
I'm sure glad he stopped Trump by giving the centrists cover. Emile Mar 2025 #20

Raven123

(7,797 posts)
1. I agree with you about Schumer's communication problem
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:26 PM
Mar 2025

I have written a letter to every Democratic Senator expressing my concern about the lack of a clear message and effective communicators.

I don’t share your view about the reason for his vote. Trump has ignored the courts. Not sure the strategy is working.

Cheezoholic

(3,719 posts)
4. Its not a strategy its the law. And yes, the courts have stepped in and yes, they may be taking their time but they are
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:35 PM
Mar 2025

following court orders. They've lost 90% of the decisions so far (and they are appealing them all of course) and are following those orders. Dragging their feet? Yes. But they are following the courts orders... so far.

rso

(2,673 posts)
2. Schumer
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:26 PM
Mar 2025

He does not think that we’re in a Constitutional crisis yet, but will be there if and when Trump ignores SCOTUS rulings against him. That outlook and perspective on his part explains why we’re not there yet.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
3. I disagree with pretty much
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:34 PM
Mar 2025

Everything you posted, Chuck doesn’t believe we are in constitutional crisis yet. His plan is to get Trump’s poll numbers down.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
14. I'm saying we are in the midst of a constitutional crisis right now.
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 11:01 PM
Mar 2025

It is great that courts, judges are ruling against President Musk, but he is ignoring the judges orders.

I am saying that the entire setting up a fake DOGE department is illegal and unconstitutional. Now DOGE has more power and has Federal Marshalls, the FBI, and the DC police enabling Musk'd cyber punks to break into both government and non-government buildings.

I am saying that Chuck's main problem is a huge one, he doesn't believe we are in a constitutional crisis. A case can be made that the CR is unconstitutional, transferring Congressional power to a made up department.

Chuck Schumer's plan is to get Trump's polling numbers down and then Democrats can win future elections.

When one DOGE employee is arrested, when One DOGE lawyer is sanctioned, then I will say that the courts are starting to work.

BannonsLiver

(20,595 posts)
17. Yes I'm tired of the "constitutional crisis" being looked at as some future event.
Wed Mar 19, 2025, 12:15 AM
Mar 2025

We’re there. It’s happening.

yellow dahlia

(5,877 posts)
5. I was yelling at the tv.
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 09:37 PM
Mar 2025

He is a bad communicator.

He also communicated badly around the recent events regarding the CR.

He has been completely lacking in strategy.

And yes, he is condescending.

He is the wrong leader for the moment.

keepthemhonestO

(628 posts)
7. Well stated
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:02 PM
Mar 2025

I completely agree, I wish I could have so eloquently put into words.

I never understood
what the allure was with Schumer and how he kept getting voted in. I used to live in NY too but I never understood him and never will.

I do see why he did what he did.

Definitely a messaging problem in the party and a backbone problem.



Cuthbert Allgood

(5,339 posts)
8. If our strategy is to do what Schumer is doing and move to the right like Newsom,
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:07 PM
Mar 2025

then J.D. Vance will be the next President because it's a losing strategy.

Cheezoholic

(3,719 posts)
9. We have to do whatever we can to get to the midterms alive. There was no strategy here only 2 choices
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:20 PM
Mar 2025

And very very bad ones. Trust me, if the government were shutdown we would not have one right this minute. At least we have some semblance of a defense with the courts. They have yet to completely disregard court orders. They are pushing the courts to the very limits but they have folded (and appealed) on almost all of them. The crisis will happen when one of these cases gets to SCOTUS and they refuse an order from SCOTUS. THAT is a true Constitutional Crisis.

Once again, if the government shuts down there is the very real possibility that a National Emergency gets declared and the Executive takes over and can put the courts in "limbo" until the emergency is over, usually as declared by Congress which this Congress never would. We'd be finished then.

 

Silent Type

(12,412 posts)
10. Don't know if Schumer's vote was right or wrong. I did read today that telemedicine will continue because of CR.
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:32 PM
Mar 2025

So, at least in that one respect, maybe avoiding shutdown was good. Medicare coverage was supposed to end March 31.

I suspect there are some other reasons to at least accept CR, and move on. Extension will end just as primaries are heating up.

Otherwise, I’m tired of seeing Schumer read meaningless statements in an empty Senate chamber. Probably time for a change anyway.

EdmondDantes_

(1,797 posts)
11. It's interesting to me that often leaders in the House and Senate aren't better communicators
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:36 PM
Mar 2025

Schumer, McConnell, Harry Reid, any of the various Republican speakers. I can't recall hearing John Thune as a public speaker. Oddly John Boehner when he was resigning as House Speaker seemed better, but probably that was the first time he got to cut loose. Pelosi was good at it until the last few years when her speech got a little worse.

I get that their primary job is around rallying their caucus, but I would think it would translate better to public speaking than it does.

newdeal2

(5,414 posts)
16. All those people also all have one thing in common
Wed Mar 19, 2025, 12:02 AM
Mar 2025

Time for newer leaders who can fight and know how to use modern media.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
13. I agree that's what the thing at rhe DOJ was
Tue Mar 18, 2025, 10:40 PM
Mar 2025

They were declaring a national emergency, naybe martial law. They weren't able to do it.

617Blue

(2,472 posts)
19. Not a penny until he's out of leadership. Why won't he face voters?
Wed Mar 19, 2025, 06:27 AM
Mar 2025

The Times, the View, Hayes...Chuck lives in a bubble

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Schumer tried to expla...