General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSissy SpaceX
A little blue bird told me that the muskrat hates this nickname fiercely. I will take his hurt feelings into account every time I use it in polite company.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)EYESORE 9001
(29,743 posts)was that his phallic symbol has venereal warts.
JoseBalow
(9,516 posts)usonian
(25,441 posts)
rubbersole
(11,226 posts)usonian
(25,441 posts)It's not easy being a fake graphic artist. (take that any ambiguous way you want)
Alcohol helps. I found some Sierra Nevada Pale Ale in the pantry today, and I even found my missing best pair of reading glasses.
A banner day.
rubbersole
(11,226 posts)..which came first, the glasses or the beer?
TommyT139
(2,360 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,609 posts)TommyT139
(2,360 posts)It wouldn't be applied if the word "sissy" didn't have meaning beyond being a [nick] name.
BannonsLiver
(20,609 posts)And companies, which is what the joke is directed at, don't have genders.
You didn't understand the wordplay. You assumed it was a gender-based insult and now you're digging in, which is certainly your right to do.
TommyT139
(2,360 posts)And it's clearly about Musk.
But whatever - no ally cookies this time around. Try again tomorrow!
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)I agree that if they were applied to Democrats and others who advocate for and legislate for gender rights and care, then that would be completely inappropriate.
But Muck has completely and totally rejected his trans offspring.
Muck is cutting government agencies because they do not primarily serve white men.
Muck is part of and supporting a regime that is trying to eliminate women and many minorities from history, from web sites, from language, from government services.
Muck is an appropriate target with memes that attack his gender policies by dead-naming Muck, by mis-gendering Muck, by satirizing his sexuality and names.
TommyT139
(2,360 posts)For a lot of trans folks, this tactic used by non trans people gives the impression that a speaker is untrustworthy.
Not saying you are -- just providing info.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,609 posts)Solid word play!
TommyT139
(2,360 posts)Response to EYESORE 9001 (Original post)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.