Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:47 PM Dec 2012

Bipartisanship should not be defined as BOTH parties running over America's most vulnerable.

Leave social programs out of this, Mr. President.

p.s. We know what you really mean when you say "strengthen".

Sincerely,

Poll_Blind

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bipartisanship should not be defined as BOTH parties running over America's most vulnerable. (Original Post) Poll_Blind Dec 2012 OP
Aaaaand chained CPI is a tax increase on the poor through middle class... Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #1
kr. cuts to other social programs, not just SS -- and tax hikes on everyone, but proportionally HiPointDem Dec 2012 #2

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
1. Aaaaand chained CPI is a tax increase on the poor through middle class...
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:12 PM
Dec 2012

It's fucking bullshit and I am so angry, I could spit nails.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
2. kr. cuts to other social programs, not just SS -- and tax hikes on everyone, but proportionally
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:17 PM
Dec 2012

more on the lower & middle classes.

Excellent, mr president!!! yes we can die!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bipartisanship should not...