Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy don't we go back to the original intent of the 2nd amendment?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_ConstitutionAs passed by the Congress:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.[8]
What I propose:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, every citizen who chooses to bear firearms should enlist in the modern day version of the militia -- a state guard, the national guard, or the coast guard -- and participate in monthly training sessions.
http://washingtonguard.org/wsg/
The Washington State Guard (WSG) is an all-volunteer unit organized under the Military Department of the State of Washington. Its members come from all walks of life. They normally serve without remuneration and meet monthly, or more often as needed, within organized units stationed at strategic locations throughout the State.
National Guard:
http://www.nationalguard.mil/
Coast Guard:
http://www.uscg.mil/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1138 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why don't we go back to the original intent of the 2nd amendment? (Original Post)
pnwmom
Dec 2012
OP
msongs
(67,430 posts)1. original intent is flintlock rifles/pistols nt
Loudly
(2,436 posts)2. When the goofs show up here to insist that you use a quill pen
explain the difference to them.
LeftInTX
(25,462 posts)3. I wonder if we could get rid of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
And go back the the Gun Control Act of 1968
1986 is when the Right to Carry Laws kept popping up in various states.
Right to Carry Laws 1986-2011
Red: Prohibited to carry a gun
Blue and Green: Are the most permissive.
ComplimentarySwine
(515 posts)4. I support getting rid of FOPA '86
That was the law where they snuck in the machine gun ban at the last minuite. Without that, I might finally be able to get that Glock 18 I've been wanting so long. And a real M4A1. And...