Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Courts keep ruling... thank you Senator Shcumer for preventing the government shutdown (Original Post) question everything Mar 2025 OP
Meh, the performative anger at Schumer seems to be mostly done, he's back to doing actual work. tritsofme Mar 2025 #1
All of those cases would almost certainly still have been issued. Ms. Toad Mar 2025 #2
And after the "2-3 weeks?" They were going to keep the government shutdown for as long as they wanted question everything Mar 2025 #3
Umm Hmm. Ms. Toad Mar 2025 #9
Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #19
I believe the anti deficiency act would have allowed the courts to continue to operate after the 2-3 week period. Scrivener7 Mar 2025 #4
Doesn't the Antideficiency Act exist to prohibit the spending of funds outside of what was appropriated by Congress? tritsofme Mar 2025 #5
It provides for the continuation of the court's essential work related to the safety of Scrivener7 Mar 2025 #6
That doesn't necessarily mean the courts would have been able to hear challenges to Trump's actions tritsofme Mar 2025 #8
If the government is shut down, what makes you think... yowzayowzayowza Mar 2025 #12
I'm not sure how that makes sense in this context. tritsofme Mar 2025 #15
Dismantle the courts too based on whatever... yowzayowzayowza Mar 2025 #17
You are probably correct - Ms. Toad Mar 2025 #11
Yes. Though I'm thinking it's not worth the effort to try to convince some here of that. Scrivener7 Mar 2025 #13
Yup. Ms. Toad Mar 2025 #14
Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #7
Indeed. Histrionics is not an effective governing philosophy. n/t yowzayowzayowza Mar 2025 #10
That's the way I see it, too... Mahalo! Cha Mar 2025 #16
It was a lose/lose scenario for the Dems drmeow Mar 2025 #18
If the Federal Government was shutdown, musk/trump would have been free to shut down everything LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #20

Ms. Toad

(38,523 posts)
2. All of those cases would almost certainly still have been issued.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:51 PM
Mar 2025

Federal courts have an operating reserve, so they can continue to operate for 2-3 weeks after a government shut-down. In other words, even if the government had shut down on the 14th, the courts would just now be nearing the point at which they had to shut down.

So no thanks to Schumer for giving in without a responsible deal in exchange - especially for failing to get the provisions removed which forfeited legislative power to the executive branch.

question everything

(52,032 posts)
3. And after the "2-3 weeks?" They were going to keep the government shutdown for as long as they wanted
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:54 PM
Mar 2025

Ms. Toad

(38,523 posts)
9. Umm Hmm.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:14 PM
Mar 2025

A shut down would impact Red areas just as much as blue areas. It would not have lasted much longer than that.

And my point is that you are thanking Schumer for something that would have happened even if the government shut down. It is factually incorrect that the decisions would not have issued had the government shut down.

Schumer should not have agreed to the continuing resolution without getting something return.

Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #9)

Scrivener7

(59,332 posts)
4. I believe the anti deficiency act would have allowed the courts to continue to operate after the 2-3 week period.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 05:57 PM
Mar 2025

tritsofme

(19,872 posts)
5. Doesn't the Antideficiency Act exist to prohibit the spending of funds outside of what was appropriated by Congress?
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:02 PM
Mar 2025

Scrivener7

(59,332 posts)
6. It provides for the continuation of the court's essential work related to the safety of
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:06 PM
Mar 2025

human life and protection of property.

tritsofme

(19,872 posts)
8. That doesn't necessarily mean the courts would have been able to hear challenges to Trump's actions
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:14 PM
Mar 2025

And still, no one would be paid.

The functioning of the courts would become severely impaired during a long term government shutdown, which is what we would have been facing down.

yowzayowzayowza

(7,081 posts)
12. If the government is shut down, what makes you think...
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:17 PM
Mar 2025

Comrade Bonespurs is going to respect the Antideficiency Act?

tritsofme

(19,872 posts)
15. I'm not sure how that makes sense in this context.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:23 PM
Mar 2025

It is the Antideficiency Act that causes the government to shutdown when funding lapses.

Trump/Musk would have loved to have the government shutdown so they could further dismantle it.

Ms. Toad

(38,523 posts)
11. You are probably correct -
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:16 PM
Mar 2025

that after the reserve runs out, Article III courts would continue to operate as mission critical.

Scrivener7

(59,332 posts)
13. Yes. Though I'm thinking it's not worth the effort to try to convince some here of that.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:19 PM
Mar 2025

Ms. Toad

(38,523 posts)
14. Yup.
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 06:23 PM
Mar 2025

Not to mention that shutdowns don't typically last for longer than the operating reserve federal courts have. One under Clinton was 21 days, and the last one under Trump was 35 days. People are already angry enough (including Republican congress critters - a few of whom are waking up) that I don't think this one would have lasted very long.

Response to question everything (Original post)

drmeow

(5,986 posts)
18. It was a lose/lose scenario for the Dems
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 07:06 PM
Mar 2025

Keep the government open and make Trump happy/Shut down the government and make Musk happy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Courts keep rulin...