Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyn borkins

(1,372 posts)
Sat Apr 5, 2025, 10:00 PM Apr 2025

If Violence Portends: Beware the Ides of 'Martial Law'

Last edited Sat Apr 5, 2025, 11:01 PM - Edit history (1)

Corrected to replace my poorly-referenced discussion of Martial Law with text by onenote.

"The Supreme Court long ago explained what martial law is and the limits of its implementation under the Constitution:

Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866)

"If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power. Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war."


Absolutely Worth Noting (Right-The-Hell Now)

"Nothing good ever comes of violence"

(Martin Luther, 1483-1546)

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Violence Portends: Beware the Ides of 'Martial Law' (Original Post) wyn borkins Apr 2025 OP
all the violent J6 thugs were pardoned Skittles Apr 2025 #1
I'm not sure what the source of your quote is, but it is not what martial law is under US law onenote Apr 2025 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author wyn borkins Apr 2025 #3

onenote

(46,054 posts)
2. I'm not sure what the source of your quote is, but it is not what martial law is under US law
Sat Apr 5, 2025, 10:15 PM
Apr 2025

The Supreme Court long ago explained what martial law is and the limits of its implementation under the Constitution:

Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866)

"If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power. Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war."

Response to onenote (Reply #2)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Violence Portends: Bew...