General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCriminals will still be able to get assault rifles.
I am so tired of hearing that one, over and over. None of the recent mass shooters that I can recall...from Va.Tech, the Aurora, CO shooter, the mall shooter from last week...and now Adam Lanza had prior criminal records that I can tell. They were all from fairly middle class families... and they all seemed unlikely to know how to buy assault rifles off the black market.
Yes, I am sure SOME criminals will still be able to obtain assault rifles...that's what criminals do...but, can't we at least make an effort to keep the damned things away from non-criminals who snap for whatever reason?
This country has gone nuts.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And can be discerned by the amount of melanin in the epidermis.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...will forever escape you.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Because I know you'll never ruin the surprise by explaining it to my slower-than-average self.
Oh well.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,188 posts)Everyone is a potential "criminal."
You, me, anyone can potentially snap.
There's nothing that stops supposedly "responsible" gun owners from becoming criminals.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Posted: 12/12/2012 11:20 am EST | Updated: 12/12/2012 11:20 am EST
A jilted ex-boyfriend pumped a dozen bullets into the body of a museum curator last year. The shooter got a life sentence. The seller who illegally dealt him a .40-caliber handgun was sentenced to one year.
But that's not enough, said the family of the murdered woman and gun control advocates. They want to punish Armslist.com, a sort of Craigslist marketplace of firearm classified ads, claiming it enabled the seller and buyer to conduct the fated deal.
Ex-boyfriend Dmitry Smirnov killed Jitka Vesel in a Chicago suburb on April 13, 2011, after traveling to Washington state to buy a gun from Benedict Ladera, whom he'd found via Armslist.com. The deal was illegal because Washington outlaws gun sales to out-of-state residents. Smirnov, a 20-year-old Russian immigrant living in Canada, paid $200 extra so Ladera would look the other way.
"Armslist breached [its] duty by designing its website to encourage its users to circumvent existing gun laws," said the wrongful death lawsuit Vesel's brother Alex Vesely and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence planned to file Wednesday in Chicago. "Users of Armslist.com could easily evade gun laws with a simple 'click of the mouse.' Armslist ... like Smirnov and the gun seller, must now be held accountable."
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/12/brady-campaign-armslist-gun-purchase_n_2279465.html
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The site provides all the steps to legally transfer that gun out of state, from the seller in WA, to a FFL in the buyer's state to do the transfer. So they skipped that, closed the listing on Gunbroker, and did the deal directly, knowingly illegally. That's on the seller, who should have gotten a longer sentence for it.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Internet usage is at an all-time high. People pay to publish an advertisement, as far as I know there is no cost to post on armslist. I wish the NYTimes wouldn't run ads for guns too, so not really sure what you're getting at here.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Why is it a problem now?
I do appreciate that you are being consistent at least, in disliking either medium.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Those guns were not obtained by the shooter in this manner.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Seriously.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Shit, at least when you do it online for Gunbroker, the BATFE can get a warrant and track IP's.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Guns aren't any more difficult to transport or hide.
Hell, my roommate will sometimes get pot off of Craigslist.
But drugs don't murder people and guns aren't addictive.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And how deadly something is has zero bearing on my argument.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)If pot, for example, actually killed people in large numbers, in particular people who did not choose to use pot but instead had pot used on them without their permission, I would be all for continued and even stricter pot prohibition.
Just so we are clear here:
If guns, for example, actually killed people in large numbers, in particular people who did not choose to use guns but instead had guns used on them without their permission, I would be all for some obvious and sensible prohibitions on guns.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's about what is and isn't possible to practically prohibit.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)What factors make guns easier to practically prohibit than pot has proven to be?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)guns will be available, the legal ones will be far less capable of mass slaughter. The existence of a legal market for guns combined with draconian penalties for the sale and possession of illegal weapons will make a black market not very likely. 99.9% of gun owners will settle for smaller magazines rather than risk a long prison term.
If pot were available legally, but only in small quantities and at controlled strengths, there would be no black market for pot.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)cigarettes have nothing to do with it.
the pot discussion seems to have worn itself out, thank god.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)We've done a lot to make smoking illegal in public spaces. As the primary victims of smoking, ignoring the second hand smoke problem, are the people doing the smoking, I am against prohibition. The second hand smoke problem is troubling. I don't have an answer. An argument might be plausibly made that the harm here is great enough to justify stronger regulation.
I certainly think that we could regulate product placement in entertainment much more than we are currently doing. Everyone on TV seems to be smoking again - how the heck did that happen?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)In other words, besides passing legislation we need to find a way to change our collective mindset.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)sometimes that war gets real and very bloody.
ComplimentarySwine
(515 posts)guns can be a lot of fun, which some may argue makes them rather addictive. Once you buy one, there so often seems to be a second, or third, or fourth, etc.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Going to be hard to fix!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)ass. But I've heard of drug smugglers doing so.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And something like 90% of firearms deaths are from pistols. Even among mass shooters a majority of them seem to choose pistols (easier to conceal, after all). And you just need a coat or sweatshirt with a large-ish pocket to hide one.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)haven't. They've used those damned AR-15's or whatever those things are. Bushmasters.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The deadliest was VA Tech, and he used only handguns.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)the last FEW have.
As far as Cho was concerned...he didn't get his guns illegally either, IIRC. Perhaps stricter legislation with huge penalties on the sellers would have slowed him down considerably too.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)1. limit legal magazines to 5 shots max.
2. require strict licensing of all handguns, with very restricted carry permits, and downright draconian storage and safety requirements.
I'll settle for (1), but the Canadian model on (2) is fine with me too.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)If you can, go into adult movies, you could make a bundle. If not, your analogy isn't working.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)or planning into what he did; he certainly didn't order the guns himself. The guy in Aurora DID put thought into it, and ordered one of those Bushmasters....legally.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)at that school, he would surely not have chosen that theater to play out his psychosis. Nor would the Principal or teachers have been obligated to be firearms specialists.
Tax and regulate and monitor all guns...make it expensive...pay for the administrative bureaucratic cost and for security for public places. Those who want to play games or get skilled in shooting at targets at a shooting range...fine. But just like a golf course, the upkeep and insurance is damned expensive and you have to pay to play.
The hell with the sensitive and psychological paranoia and infantile fears of a certain group. We have layers of law enforcement that are not perfect, but pretty much 1st World capable. We did that with TSA for the safety of travelers in and out of our country...we can do that for our kids.
Idiots choosing a mall or other large public places, that's tougher. But, like an airline terminal, a roomful of 6-year-olds only occurs at certain places.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)Every single one of them, including the old .22 Marlin your Dad gave you in 1963.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)"in their right minds." I know zero about psychology...but, it seems to me that if you are so worked up that you can start with your Mom, and then move on to those sweet little children...an armed guard might just be a "bump in the road."
I don't know that for sure...but, I don't think anyone does at this point.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)that go bump in the night, but confronting and/or murdering a male authority...not being sexist here because it can go both ways...is not nearly as likely. I still have a feeling that she may have been killed ostensibly to get the key or access to the guns....he had serious power issues, in any case.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)I wondered if she was on the way to the range (didn't work, stay at home) and opened the gun cabinet, and that's when he got them.
I don't know if he would have shot a man or not...hard to say. We'll never know. I just know that I wouldn't trust just a guard...I want to see strict legislation on who can even have these things. If I had what I wanted, he would have had to go to the range with his mom where she would be issued the gun she wanted to shoot...because it would have been in safe storage.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)to ban the whole lot of them. But understanding that there are people with many different circumstances and opinions, this does give us place, albeit a sad time, to start the hard work.
I mentioned on another post, how the Polly Klaas kidnapping was a powerful turning point for abducted children and especially the locals. Her Dad built a powerful network directly out of his grief. We never heard much about the Mom.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)better that than discomfort the precious gunners.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)all have trained security officers with weapons now and we don't think of them as military control zones. Just protection of the public in a gun-crazed society. Surely we can do the same for our kids.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)and I know exactly what you are referring to. Thanks for your input; I like your ideas.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)during the Polly Klaas case, our white, middle-class, formerly safe, suburban community ... as a whole ... kept their kids inside, no street soccer games, after school baseball games ended, the TV and video games inside became the "safe places" to play. Her body was ultimately found in a ditch within a couple of miles from our neighborhood.
The neighborhood never did get back to those "safer" days. Yes, we felt better every time we saw a police car go by whereas before, one hardly noticed. And even though it did not directly affect the schools as she was kidnapped from her home and murdered later, they sponsored parent meetings, experts talking to us, tips on how to keep kids safer, etc.
Mark Klaas, her dad, and the non-profit he formed out of his grief, set the stage for networks on child abduction and safety.
Now retail malls have "security" and I don't stay away afraid I'm in a Nazi Germany. Go snark to the folks in Connecticut. They have 26 times the reason ... as do schools, kids and teachers everywhere ... to welcome a bit of "security" other than the tasking the Principal and the teachers to start packing heat.
spanone
(135,855 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)We made drunk driving illegal and actually enforced the law.
Get ATF off its ass and sting private sellers.
spanone
(135,855 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)AWBs are dumb laws. They're a way to convince people who are ignorant of guns that you're doing something without actually doing anything. (eg, the bushmaster isn't an assault weapon.)
Don't take us down that rabbit hole again; if we're going to commit political suicide again I'd rather do it by banning handguns.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)This is going to be a pretty deep rabbit hole; you might want to have a piece of this cake.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)the attorney fees were 400 bucks. I do not know what a DUI costs. In NC, when you are caught with drugs in a car, the car is confiscated and sold at auction.
People take that pretty seriously.
Not sure what "logic" the poster you were responding to what missing.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Criminals don't seem to be as deadly as middle class people gone wrong. At least they don't do this kind of thing.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Rampage killer bunch their victims together and get headlines. Criminals are one or two, here and there and there and there, etc. The total for criminals is in the thousands annually.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And they may not be trying to kill.
The Ted Bundys fall more into the same category as Adam Lanza. And he did not have a criminal record for a long time before he was first caught.
Ordinary criminals are easier to catch - they have a record early on. Many of them don't kill, either.
ElbarDee
(61 posts)The shootings in Conn. are just the tip of the deadly american gun culture.
Chicago's weekend violence, which included a police shooting and a mob scene, left two dead and 16 more injured.
Shortly before noon on Saturday morning, a policeman shot a man near Ashland and Garfield following a high-speed car chase and physical struggle, according to DNAinfo Chicago.
Jamaal Moore, 23, was among five suspects that attempted to flee the wrecked SUV and got into a struggle with an officer, who alerted his colleague that he thought Moore might be armed. Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said the second officer fired, striking Moore who was holding a flashlight and not a gun. Moore died shortly after.
A crowd formed shortly after the incident, according to the Sun-Times, hurling bottles and bricks at the officers. At least five men between the ages of 19 and 31 were charged with mob action following the scene.
The second death of the weekend came Sunday in the city's Tri-Taylor neighborhood around 2:45 a.m. The Tribune says Gavin Williams, 28, of Zion, was fatally shot in the chest while he stood on the front porch of a home near Western and Flournoy.
Other shooting-related injuries from the weekend came between Friday night and Sunday morning, according to the Sun-Times and included two boys, 14 and 16, in the South Shore neighborhood. No arrests have been made for any of the shootings, though police are investigating the incident involving Moore.
Despite the violent weekend, CBS Chicago reports McCarthy claimed Monday that crime overall is down more than 8 percent from last year, with reductions in burglary, vehicle theft and sexual assaults. The numbers mark the biggest reduction in overall crime in the city in two decades, Chicago's top cop told the station.
Published: Oct. 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM
CHICAGO, Oct. 30 (UPI) -- Chicago recorded 438 homicides so far this year, three more than in all of 2011, making it one of the most violent cities in the United States, officials say.
Why isn't the wholesale slaughter of people by guns in the US not on the front page of every web-site/newspaper/magazine across the country?
Because the RW gun nut crowd suppresses the truth.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)50% drop in 20 years is astounding. It almost never gets mentioned.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)It gets mentioned all the times when some yahoo in gungeon tries to credit it to gun culture arming up . . . . . . while totally ignoring that in past couple of decades we have tougher sentences for violent criminals, better surveillance, aging population, etc.
FSogol
(45,504 posts)Criminals use cheap, easy-to-conceal, and easy-to-discard handguns. They don't use assault rifles. No one robs the local liquor store with an assault rifle.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Apparently they are being used to kill people in mass shootings instead.
The common thread between the two is that all to often, they are far too easy to obtain.
Go figure?
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)for the damned things; you could stop by Dick's Sporting goods and pick up some new socks, yoga pants for your wife, and a really cool semi-automatic weapon based upon a fully automatic military gun. I have no idea how much they cost, but looking at the redneck photos that have been posted, I am assuming they weren't that expensive.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)One of the RW arguments is that a ban on semi-automatics won't keep them out of the hands of criminals. ? So, how have I been watching too many Bruce Willis movies?
FSogol
(45,504 posts)assault rifles...that's what criminals do"?
Criminals don't use or buy assault rifles, nutters buy them.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)I am pretty sure SOME criminals will use them for bank robberies, perhaps? Not your average liquor store knockover, no.
Thanks for the laugh though: "nutters buy them."
I agree
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)about what won't work. They offer no solutions of their own - just obstruction.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)if I didn't have an "emotional" connection to the damned .22 rifles in the house (grandfather's...), I would turn them in. It's not like they don't just sit in a trunk, unused. We haven't had a bullet in the house since...1995? Or something. Someone would have to drop them on their toe to get hurt.
rock
(13,218 posts)They're made to keep the law-abiders in line. Duh.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)and once something is illegal, there is an automatic social stigma that goes with it.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)In some rare cases, they do. But the number of deaths from fully-automatic weapons is practically nil.
So gun control laws work.
Logical
(22,457 posts)semi-auto guns and large clips it is still going to be hard to 100% stop mass shootings.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)The DoD can contract with select manufacturers for their weaponry, under strict controls. Make it illegal for anyone else to make such weaponry. Make it illegal to sell such weapons to civilians, whether in private or through gun dealers. No exceptions.
It will take awhile for the black market pipeline for the weapons already in private civilian hands to dry up - but as these now illegal weapons get siezed by authorities on sight, the inventory will gradually diminish.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The military does not use "assault weapons".
The military uses assault rifles, which are classified as machine guns for civilian ownership. They are heavily restricted at the federal level, illegal in many states, and hellishly expensive due to the fixed number available for ownership.
Assault rifles and "assault weapons" are two different things. The term "assault weapon" was purposely chosen to confuse you, and it seems to have worked.
ComplimentarySwine
(515 posts)I imagine that most of them could figure out how to buy a gun off of the "black market", ie., off of the internet.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)Through robbery. They steal them from businesses and private owners who legally own the weapons.
Criminals will find ways but keeping them out of the public will actually decrease the supply for the criminals. It's circular.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)is significant. Not to mention the long term benefits of restricting production of the damn things.