Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts) Tue Dec 18, 2012, 05:56 PM Dec 2012

Bloomberg can limit drinks to 16 ounces, but we can't limit bullets in a magazine?

Anyone care to make a graphic for that?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bloomberg can limit drinks to 16 ounces, but we can't limit bullets in a magazine? (Original Post) thesquanderer Dec 2012 OP

Bloomberg and his repuke 1%er activities should not be encouraged for any reason, regardless of the ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #1

The headline is neither for nor against Bloomberg thesquanderer Dec 2012 #2

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)

1. Bloomberg and his repuke 1%er activities should not be encouraged for any reason, regardless of the

Reply to thesquanderer (Original post)

Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:43 PM

Dec 2012

benefits of the cause.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)

2. The headline is neither for nor against Bloomberg

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:20 AM

Dec 2012

The point is, he passed legislation limiting soft drinks to 16 ounces, for public health reasons.

Yet, the government can't seem to put any limit on how many bullets can be pre-loaded into a gun.

Priorities seem a little backwards, no?

Reply to this discussion